Hand and torso pre-cooling does not enhance subsequent high-intensity cycling or cognitive performance in heat.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Tessa Maroni, Brian Dawson, Grant Landers, Louise Naylor, Karen Wallman
{"title":"Hand and torso pre-cooling does not enhance subsequent high-intensity cycling or cognitive performance in heat.","authors":"Tessa Maroni, Brian Dawson, Grant Landers, Louise Naylor, Karen Wallman","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2019.1631731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the separate and combined effects of two practical cooling methods (hand and torso) used prior to exercise on subsequent high-intensity cycling performance in heat. Ten trained male cyclists (V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak: 65.7 ± 10.7 ml.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>) performed four experimental trials (randomised within-subjects design) involving 30-min of pre-cooling (20-min seated; PRE-COOL, 10 min warm-up; PRE-COOL+WUP), while using a: (1) hand-cooling glove (CG); (2) cooling jacket (CJ); (3) both CG and CJ (CG+J); or (4) no-cooling (NC) control, followed by a cycling race simulation protocol (all performed in 35.0 ± 0.6°C and 56.6 ± 4.5% RH). During the 30-min of pre-cooling, no reductions in core (Tc) or mean skin temperature (Tsk) occurred; however, Tsk remained lower in the CJ and CG+J trials compared to NC and CG (p = 0.002-0.040, <i>d</i>= 0.55-1.01). Thermal sensation ratings also indicated that participants felt \"hotter\" during NC compared to all other trials during both PRE-COOL and PRE-COOL+WUP (p = 0.001-0.015, <i>d</i>= 1.0-2.19), plus the early stages of exercise (sets 1-2; p = 0.005-0.050, <i>d</i>= 0.56-1.22). Following cooling, no differences were found for absolute Tc and Tsk responses between trials over the entire exercise protocol (p > 0.05). Exercise and cognitive (working memory) performance also did not differ between trials (p = 0.843); however, cognitive performance improved over time in all trials (p < 0.001). In summary, pre-cooling (20-min seated and 10-min warm-up) in heat did not improve subsequent high-intensity cycling performance, cognitive responses and associated thermoregulatory strain (Tc and Tsk) compared to control.</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":" ","pages":"165-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518759/pdf/KTMP_7_1631731.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2019.1631731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the separate and combined effects of two practical cooling methods (hand and torso) used prior to exercise on subsequent high-intensity cycling performance in heat. Ten trained male cyclists (V̇O2peak: 65.7 ± 10.7 ml.kg-1.min-1) performed four experimental trials (randomised within-subjects design) involving 30-min of pre-cooling (20-min seated; PRE-COOL, 10 min warm-up; PRE-COOL+WUP), while using a: (1) hand-cooling glove (CG); (2) cooling jacket (CJ); (3) both CG and CJ (CG+J); or (4) no-cooling (NC) control, followed by a cycling race simulation protocol (all performed in 35.0 ± 0.6°C and 56.6 ± 4.5% RH). During the 30-min of pre-cooling, no reductions in core (Tc) or mean skin temperature (Tsk) occurred; however, Tsk remained lower in the CJ and CG+J trials compared to NC and CG (p = 0.002-0.040, d= 0.55-1.01). Thermal sensation ratings also indicated that participants felt "hotter" during NC compared to all other trials during both PRE-COOL and PRE-COOL+WUP (p = 0.001-0.015, d= 1.0-2.19), plus the early stages of exercise (sets 1-2; p = 0.005-0.050, d= 0.56-1.22). Following cooling, no differences were found for absolute Tc and Tsk responses between trials over the entire exercise protocol (p > 0.05). Exercise and cognitive (working memory) performance also did not differ between trials (p = 0.843); however, cognitive performance improved over time in all trials (p < 0.001). In summary, pre-cooling (20-min seated and 10-min warm-up) in heat did not improve subsequent high-intensity cycling performance, cognitive responses and associated thermoregulatory strain (Tc and Tsk) compared to control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

手部和躯干的预冷并不能提高随后的高强度骑行或在高温下的认知能力。
本研究旨在比较运动前使用两种实用冷却方法(手部和躯干)对随后高温下高强度自行车运动表现的单独和综合影响。十名训练有素的男性自行车运动员(V̇O2peak:65.7 ± 10.7 ml.kg-1.min-1)进行了四次实验(随机受试者内设计),包括 30 分钟的预冷(20 分钟坐姿;PRE-COOL,10 分钟热身;PRE-COOL+WUP),同时使用以下工具:(1) 手部冷却手套(CG);(2) 手部冷却手套(CG);(3) 手部冷却手套(CG):(1) 手部冷却手套 (CG);(2) 冷却夹克 (CJ);(3) CG 和 CJ(CG+J);或 (4) 无冷却 (NC) 对照组,然后进行自行车模拟比赛(所有比赛均在 35.0 ± 0.6°C 和 56.6 ± 4.5% 相对湿度条件下进行)。在 30 分钟的预冷过程中,核心温度(Tc)或平均皮肤温度(Tsk)没有降低;但是,与 NC 和 CG 相比,CJ 和 CG+J 试验中的 Tsk 仍然较低(p = 0.002-0.040,d= 0.55-1.01)。热感觉评级还表明,在冷却前和冷却前+WUP(p = 0.001-0.015,d= 1.0-2.19)以及运动初期(第 1-2 组;p = 0.005-0.050,d= 0.56-1.22),NC 试验中参与者的热感觉比所有其他试验都要 "热"。冷却后,在整个运动方案中,试验之间的绝对 Tc 和 Tsk 反应没有发现差异(p > 0.05)。不同试验之间的运动和认知(工作记忆)表现也没有差异(p = 0.843);但是,随着时间的推移,所有试验的认知表现都有所改善(p < 0.001)。总之,与对照组相比,在高温下进行预冷(20 分钟坐姿和 10 分钟热身)并不能提高随后的高强度自行车运动成绩、认知反应和相关体温调节应变(Tc 和 Tsk)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Temperature
Temperature Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信