{"title":"Strabismus Surgery for Esotropia, Down Syndrome and Developmental Delay; Is an Altered Surgical Dose Required? A Literature Review.","authors":"Alia Harrison, Louise Allen, Anna O'Connor","doi":"10.22599/bioj.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There is a high rate of strabismus, in particular esotropia, in children with Down syndrome or developmental delay, which frequently requires surgical correction. A paper in 1994 advocated that the surgical dose be adjusted due to an altered response in these children. The aim of this literature review is to evaluate the available evidence to establish whether an altered surgical approach is required in either population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Knowledge. Only English language papers were eligible for inclusion. The papers were collated in chronological order for analysis, and their references searched for further relevant papers. Forward citation searches were also undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 2 × 2 comparison is made between publications on Down syndrome (in isolation) and developmental delay populations (including Down syndrome) with adjusted versus non-adjusted surgery. Published surgical success rates on esotropia from unaltered surgical doses range from 62.0%-85.7% (four papers) in the Down syndrome cohort, with none of the adjusted surgeries having a successful outcome. Surgical success rates from adjusted surgical doses in developmental delay cohort range from 37.5%-86.0% (seven papers), with one unadjusted surgical success rate of 76.0%. The results across the studies are summarised in a table and discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An exaggerated surgical effect in individuals with developmental delay has been reported, and this population may benefit from a reduced surgical dose. Published research does not support giving a reduced surgical dose in individuals with Down syndrome, but more research needs to be done to make a definitive conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510400/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background and purpose: There is a high rate of strabismus, in particular esotropia, in children with Down syndrome or developmental delay, which frequently requires surgical correction. A paper in 1994 advocated that the surgical dose be adjusted due to an altered response in these children. The aim of this literature review is to evaluate the available evidence to establish whether an altered surgical approach is required in either population.
Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Knowledge. Only English language papers were eligible for inclusion. The papers were collated in chronological order for analysis, and their references searched for further relevant papers. Forward citation searches were also undertaken.
Results: A 2 × 2 comparison is made between publications on Down syndrome (in isolation) and developmental delay populations (including Down syndrome) with adjusted versus non-adjusted surgery. Published surgical success rates on esotropia from unaltered surgical doses range from 62.0%-85.7% (four papers) in the Down syndrome cohort, with none of the adjusted surgeries having a successful outcome. Surgical success rates from adjusted surgical doses in developmental delay cohort range from 37.5%-86.0% (seven papers), with one unadjusted surgical success rate of 76.0%. The results across the studies are summarised in a table and discussed.
Conclusions: An exaggerated surgical effect in individuals with developmental delay has been reported, and this population may benefit from a reduced surgical dose. Published research does not support giving a reduced surgical dose in individuals with Down syndrome, but more research needs to be done to make a definitive conclusion.
背景与目的:唐氏综合症或发育迟缓儿童的斜视,尤其是内斜视发生率高,经常需要手术矫正。1994年的一篇论文主张,由于这些儿童的反应发生了变化,应调整手术剂量。本文献综述的目的是评估现有证据,以确定是否需要改变手术入路。方法:利用PubMed和Web of Knowledge进行文献综述。只有英文论文才有资格纳入。论文按时间顺序进行整理以供分析,并检索其参考文献以进一步查找相关论文。还进行了引文转发检索。结果:对唐氏综合征(孤立)和发育迟缓人群(包括唐氏综合征)进行调整手术和非调整手术的出版物进行了2 × 2比较。在唐氏综合征队列中,未改变手术剂量的内斜视手术成功率为62.0%-85.7%(四篇论文),调整后的手术没有成功的结果。发育迟缓队列调整手术剂量的手术成功率为37.5%-86.0%(7篇论文),未调整的手术成功率为76.0%。所有研究的结果总结在一个表格中并进行讨论。结论:据报道,在发育迟缓的个体中,手术效果被夸大了,这类人群可能从减少手术剂量中受益。已发表的研究并不支持减少唐氏综合症患者的手术剂量,但需要做更多的研究才能得出明确的结论。