The Role of the Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting High-Risk Heart Score in Patients Admitted with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 7.3 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-28 DOI:10.1159/000508592
Elshaimaa Seaoud, Ahmed Abdel Hakim Abdelaal Mohamed, Moataz A Elkot
{"title":"The Role of the Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting High-Risk Heart Score in Patients Admitted with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Elshaimaa Seaoud,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdel Hakim Abdelaal Mohamed,&nbsp;Moataz A Elkot","doi":"10.1159/000508592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For cardiologists, management of acute chest pain continues to be a challenge. Physicians struggle to avoid unnecessary admissions and at the same time not to miss high-risk patients needing urgent intervention. Therefore, diagnostic strategies focus on identifying patients in whom an acute coronary syndrome can be safely ruled out based on findings from history, physical examination, and early cardiac marker measurement. The HEART score, a clinical prediction rule, was developed to provide the clinician with a simple and reliable predictor of cardiac risk.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as independent laboratory biomarkers when associated with the HEART risk score.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 120 patients who attended the emergency department with acute chest pain. NLR and PLR were both measured. In addition, the HEART score was the valid instrument used in evaluating and risk stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a positive correlation between the HEART score and the mean PLR and NLR (<i>p</i> = 0.000*). PLR and NLR were found to be significantly higher in the high-risk HEART score group (<i>p</i> = 0.05 and 0.0001*, respectively). A PLR of 115.5 and above had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 78%, while an NLR of 3.95 and above had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 86% to detect high-risk HEART score patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PLR and NLR proved to be a useful tool to identify high-risk patients when validated against the HEART score.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"8 1-2","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000508592","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000508592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: For cardiologists, management of acute chest pain continues to be a challenge. Physicians struggle to avoid unnecessary admissions and at the same time not to miss high-risk patients needing urgent intervention. Therefore, diagnostic strategies focus on identifying patients in whom an acute coronary syndrome can be safely ruled out based on findings from history, physical examination, and early cardiac marker measurement. The HEART score, a clinical prediction rule, was developed to provide the clinician with a simple and reliable predictor of cardiac risk.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as independent laboratory biomarkers when associated with the HEART risk score.

Method: A cross-sectional study of 120 patients who attended the emergency department with acute chest pain. NLR and PLR were both measured. In addition, the HEART score was the valid instrument used in evaluating and risk stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group.

Results: There was a positive correlation between the HEART score and the mean PLR and NLR (p = 0.000*). PLR and NLR were found to be significantly higher in the high-risk HEART score group (p = 0.05 and 0.0001*, respectively). A PLR of 115.5 and above had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 78%, while an NLR of 3.95 and above had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 86% to detect high-risk HEART score patients.

Conclusion: PLR and NLR proved to be a useful tool to identify high-risk patients when validated against the HEART score.

血小板/淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在预测非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者高危心脏评分中的作用
背景:对于心脏病专家来说,急性胸痛的治疗仍然是一个挑战。医生努力避免不必要的入院,同时不错过需要紧急干预的高危患者。因此,诊断策略侧重于根据病史、体格检查和早期心脏标志物测量结果,确定可以安全地排除急性冠状动脉综合征的患者。HEART评分是一种临床预测规则,旨在为临床医生提供简单可靠的心脏风险预测指标。目的:本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞比率(PLR)作为独立的实验室生物标志物与心脏风险评分的相关性。方法:对120例急诊科急性胸痛患者进行横断面研究。测量NLR和PLR。此外,HEART评分是评估和将患者分为低、中、高风险组的有效工具。结果:HEART评分与平均PLR、NLR呈正相关(p = 0.000*)。高危HEART评分组PLR、NLR明显高于高危HEART评分组(p = 0.05、0.0001*)。PLR为115.5及以上,检测HEART评分高危患者的敏感性为73%,特异性为78%;NLR为3.95及以上,检测HEART评分高危患者的敏感性为75%,特异性为86%。结论:PLR和NLR被证明是识别高危患者的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信