Blood Pressure during Blood Collection and the Implication for Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

IF 7.3 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-02 DOI:10.1159/000506646
Niamh Chapman, Dean S Picone, Rachel E Climie, Martin G Schultz, Mark R Nelson, James E Sharman
{"title":"Blood Pressure during Blood Collection and the Implication for Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.","authors":"Niamh Chapman,&nbsp;Dean S Picone,&nbsp;Rachel E Climie,&nbsp;Martin G Schultz,&nbsp;Mark R Nelson,&nbsp;James E Sharman","doi":"10.1159/000506646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood collection and blood pressure (BP) measurements are routinely performed during the same consultation to assess absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study aimed to determine the effect of blood collection on BP and subsequent calculation of the absolute CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five participants aged 58 ± 9 years (53% male) had systolic BP (SBP) measured using clinical guideline methods (clinic SBP). Then, on a separate visit, BP was measured immediately before, during, and after blood collection. Absolute CVD risk scores were calculated (Framingham equation) using SBP from each measurement condition and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of low (<10%), moderate (10-15%), and high (≥15%) absolute CVD risks among the participants was 67%, 22%, and 11%, respectively, using clinic SBP. SBP values before and during blood collection were significantly higher compared to values after blood collection (130 ± 18 and 132 ± 19 vs. 126 ± 18 mm Hg; <i>p</i> = 0.010 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between clinic SBP (128 ± 18 mm Hg) and blood collection SBP (<i>p</i> = 0.99) or the absolute CVD risk scores (7.3 ± 6.5; 7.6 ± 5.9; 7.7 ± 6.1; and 7.1 ± 5.7%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.995 for all). The mean intraclass correlation (95% CI) indicated good agreement between absolute CVD risk scores calculated with clinic SBP and each blood collection SBP (0.86 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], 0.85 [95% CI 0.71-0.91], and 0.87 [95% CI 0.76-0.93], respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001, for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absolute CVD risk calculation is not affected by use of SBP measurements recorded at the time of blood collection. Therefore, it is acceptable to collect blood and measure BP during the same consultation for absolute CVD risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"8 1-2","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000506646","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000506646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood collection and blood pressure (BP) measurements are routinely performed during the same consultation to assess absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study aimed to determine the effect of blood collection on BP and subsequent calculation of the absolute CVD risk.

Methods: Forty-five participants aged 58 ± 9 years (53% male) had systolic BP (SBP) measured using clinical guideline methods (clinic SBP). Then, on a separate visit, BP was measured immediately before, during, and after blood collection. Absolute CVD risk scores were calculated (Framingham equation) using SBP from each measurement condition and compared.

Results: The prevalence of low (<10%), moderate (10-15%), and high (≥15%) absolute CVD risks among the participants was 67%, 22%, and 11%, respectively, using clinic SBP. SBP values before and during blood collection were significantly higher compared to values after blood collection (130 ± 18 and 132 ± 19 vs. 126 ± 18 mm Hg; p = 0.010 and p = 0.003, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between clinic SBP (128 ± 18 mm Hg) and blood collection SBP (p = 0.99) or the absolute CVD risk scores (7.3 ± 6.5; 7.6 ± 5.9; 7.7 ± 6.1; and 7.1 ± 5.7%, respectively; p = 0.995 for all). The mean intraclass correlation (95% CI) indicated good agreement between absolute CVD risk scores calculated with clinic SBP and each blood collection SBP (0.86 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], 0.85 [95% CI 0.71-0.91], and 0.87 [95% CI 0.76-0.93], respectively; p < 0.001, for all).

Conclusion: Absolute CVD risk calculation is not affected by use of SBP measurements recorded at the time of blood collection. Therefore, it is acceptable to collect blood and measure BP during the same consultation for absolute CVD risk assessment.

采血期间的血压及其对心血管绝对风险评估的意义。
背景:在同一会诊期间,常规进行采血和血压(BP)测量,以评估绝对心血管疾病(CVD)风险。本研究旨在确定采血对血压的影响以及随后对心血管疾病绝对风险的计算。方法:45例(58±9岁)参与者(53%男性)采用临床指南方法测量收缩压(SBP)。然后,在单独的访问中,在采血之前,期间和之后立即测量血压。使用每个测量条件下的收缩压计算绝对心血管疾病风险评分(Framingham方程)并进行比较。结果:患病率低(p = 0.010、p = 0.003)。然而,临床收缩压(128±18 mm Hg)与采血收缩压(p = 0.99)或CVD绝对危险评分(7.3±6.5;7.6±5.9;7.7±6.1;和7.1±5.7%;P = 0.995)。平均类内相关性(95% CI)表明,临床收缩压计算的绝对心血管疾病风险评分与每次采血收缩压之间的一致性良好(分别为0.86 [95% CI 0.74-0.92]、0.85 [95% CI 0.71-0.91]和0.87 [95% CI 0.76-0.93]);P < 0.001)。结论:使用采血时记录的收缩压测量值不影响CVD的绝对风险计算。因此,在同一会诊期间采集血液和测量血压以进行心血管疾病绝对风险评估是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信