Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Puncture in Cardiac Lead Implantation: Time to Move to a New Standard Access?

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ana Paula Tagliari, Adriano Nunes Kochi, Bernardo Mastella, Rodrigo Petersen Saadi, Andres di Leoni Ferrari, Luiz Henrique Dussin, Leandro de Moura, Márcio Rodrigo Martins, Eduardo Keller Saadi, Carisi Anne Polanczyk
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Puncture in Cardiac Lead Implantation: Time to Move to a New Standard Access?","authors":"Ana Paula Tagliari,&nbsp;Adriano Nunes Kochi,&nbsp;Bernardo Mastella,&nbsp;Rodrigo Petersen Saadi,&nbsp;Andres di Leoni Ferrari,&nbsp;Luiz Henrique Dussin,&nbsp;Leandro de Moura,&nbsp;Márcio Rodrigo Martins,&nbsp;Eduardo Keller Saadi,&nbsp;Carisi Anne Polanczyk","doi":"10.15420/aer.2020.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac stimulation therapy has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. Currently, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are the mainstream therapy for many potentially lethal heart conditions, such as advanced atrioventricular block or sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Despite sometimes being lifesaving, the implant is surgical and therefore carries all the inevitable intrinsic risks. In the process of technology evolution, one of the most important factors is to make it safer for the patient. In the context of CIED implants, complications include accidental puncture of intrathoracic structures. Alternative strategies to intrathoracic subclavian vein puncture include cephalic vein dissection or axillary vein puncture, which can be guided by fluoroscopy, venography or, more recently, ultrasound. In this article, the authors analyse the state of the art of ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture using evidence from landmark studies in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"9 2","pages":"78-82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/0a/aer-09-78.PMC7491067.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2020.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Cardiac stimulation therapy has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. Currently, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are the mainstream therapy for many potentially lethal heart conditions, such as advanced atrioventricular block or sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Despite sometimes being lifesaving, the implant is surgical and therefore carries all the inevitable intrinsic risks. In the process of technology evolution, one of the most important factors is to make it safer for the patient. In the context of CIED implants, complications include accidental puncture of intrathoracic structures. Alternative strategies to intrathoracic subclavian vein puncture include cephalic vein dissection or axillary vein puncture, which can be guided by fluoroscopy, venography or, more recently, ultrasound. In this article, the authors analyse the state of the art of ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture using evidence from landmark studies in this field.

超声引导下腋静脉穿刺心脏导联植入:是时候采用新的标准途径了?
心脏刺激疗法在过去的30年里有了显著的发展。目前,心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)是许多潜在致命性心脏病的主流治疗方法,如晚期房室传导阻滞或持续性室性心动过速或纤颤。尽管有时可以挽救生命,但植入物是外科手术,因此具有所有不可避免的内在风险。在技术发展的过程中,最重要的因素之一是使其对患者更安全。在CIED植入物的情况下,并发症包括意外穿刺胸内结构。胸内锁骨下静脉穿刺的替代策略包括头静脉夹层或腋窝静脉穿刺,可在透视、静脉造影或最近的超声指导下进行。在这篇文章中,作者分析了超声引导下腋窝静脉穿刺技术的现状,并使用了该领域具有里程碑意义的研究证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信