Immunologic Response of HIV-Infected Children to Different Regimens of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
AIDS Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2020-08-13 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/6415432
Teshale Ayele Mega, Firehiwot Belayneh Usamo, Getandale Zeleke Negera
{"title":"Immunologic Response of HIV-Infected Children to Different Regimens of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Teshale Ayele Mega,&nbsp;Firehiwot Belayneh Usamo,&nbsp;Getandale Zeleke Negera","doi":"10.1155/2020/6415432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both abacavir- (ABC-) based and zidovudine- (AZT-) based regimens are widely utilized for managing HIV infection in children. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data regarding their immunological response and associated risk factors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective hospital-based cohort study was conducted on HIV-infected children in Jimma Medical Center (JMC). A total of 179 records were reviewed by including data from November 2015 to April 2017. Data were collected on sociodemographic, clinical characteristics of patients and drug-related variables. Data analysis was done using STATA 13.1. Mixed-effect linear regression was performed to assess the difference in CD4+ changes between groups adjusting for baseline characteristics. The change in predicted CD4 count attributed to each regimen was also assessed by marginal analysis. <i>P</i> < 0.05 for slope of the random-effect linear regression was used as an indicator for the presence of association.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of 179 patients, 98 (54.7%) were females. The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 939.8 ± 478.3 and 984.92 ± 453.1 days for ABC and AZT groups, respectively. AZT group had a significant CD4+ count gain per visit compared with their ABC counterparts ((<i>β</i> = 20.51, 95% CI [6.37-34.65]), <i>P</i> = 0.004) over time. The regimen AZT + 3TC + LPV/r tended to have an excellent predicted CD4+ lymphocyte count change relative to all other regimens, while ABC + 3TC + LPV/r had the least immunologic recovery (margins 338.0 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> versus 249.13 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> (<i>P</i> < 0.001)). Baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count, ART group, WHO clinical stages, and viral load were independent predictors for CD4+ change overtime.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AZT-based regimens seem to have better immunological response compared to ABC-based regimens. Immunologic response was described worse in patients with a viral load of >1000copies/ml, low baseline CD4+ count, advanced WHO clinical stages, and ABC-containing regimens. Further study is needed to clarify these aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":46303,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Treatment","volume":"2020 ","pages":"6415432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6415432","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6415432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Both abacavir- (ABC-) based and zidovudine- (AZT-) based regimens are widely utilized for managing HIV infection in children. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data regarding their immunological response and associated risk factors in Ethiopia.

Methods: A retrospective hospital-based cohort study was conducted on HIV-infected children in Jimma Medical Center (JMC). A total of 179 records were reviewed by including data from November 2015 to April 2017. Data were collected on sociodemographic, clinical characteristics of patients and drug-related variables. Data analysis was done using STATA 13.1. Mixed-effect linear regression was performed to assess the difference in CD4+ changes between groups adjusting for baseline characteristics. The change in predicted CD4 count attributed to each regimen was also assessed by marginal analysis. P < 0.05 for slope of the random-effect linear regression was used as an indicator for the presence of association.

Result: Of 179 patients, 98 (54.7%) were females. The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 939.8 ± 478.3 and 984.92 ± 453.1 days for ABC and AZT groups, respectively. AZT group had a significant CD4+ count gain per visit compared with their ABC counterparts ((β = 20.51, 95% CI [6.37-34.65]), P = 0.004) over time. The regimen AZT + 3TC + LPV/r tended to have an excellent predicted CD4+ lymphocyte count change relative to all other regimens, while ABC + 3TC + LPV/r had the least immunologic recovery (margins 338.0 cells/mm3 versus 249.13 cells/mm3 (P < 0.001)). Baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count, ART group, WHO clinical stages, and viral load were independent predictors for CD4+ change overtime.

Conclusion: AZT-based regimens seem to have better immunological response compared to ABC-based regimens. Immunologic response was described worse in patients with a viral load of >1000copies/ml, low baseline CD4+ count, advanced WHO clinical stages, and ABC-containing regimens. Further study is needed to clarify these aspects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

hiv感染儿童对不同抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的免疫反应:一项回顾性观察研究
背景:以阿巴卡韦(ABC)和以齐多夫定(AZT)为基础的治疗方案被广泛用于治疗儿童HIV感染。不幸的是,埃塞俄比亚缺乏关于其免疫反应和相关危险因素的数据。方法:对吉马医疗中心(JMC) hiv感染儿童进行回顾性医院队列研究。通过纳入2015年11月至2017年4月的数据,共审查了179项记录。收集了社会人口学、患者临床特征和药物相关变量的数据。数据分析采用STATA 13.1。采用混合效应线性回归评估各组间CD4+变化的差异,调整基线特征。预测CD4计数的变化归因于每个方案也通过边际分析进行评估。随机效应线性回归斜率P < 0.05作为相关性存在的指标。结果:179例患者中,女性98例,占54.7%。ABC组和AZT组的平均随访时间(±SD)分别为939.8±478.3天和984.92±453.1天。随着时间的推移,AZT组与ABC组相比,每次就诊CD4+计数显著增加((β = 20.51, 95% CI [6.37-34.65]), P = 0.004)。相对于所有其他方案,AZT + 3TC + LPV/r方案倾向于具有良好的预测CD4+淋巴细胞计数变化,而ABC + 3TC + LPV/r方案具有最低的免疫恢复(边缘为338.0细胞/mm3比249.13细胞/mm3 (P < 0.001))。基线CD4+淋巴细胞计数、ART组、WHO临床分期和病毒载量是CD4+随时间变化的独立预测因子。结论:与以abc为基础的方案相比,以azt为基础的方案似乎具有更好的免疫应答。病毒载量>1000拷贝/ml、基线CD4+计数低、世卫组织临床分期较晚和含abc方案的患者免疫反应较差。需要进一步的研究来澄清这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS Research and Treatment
AIDS Research and Treatment INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focused on all aspects of HIV and AIDS, from the molecular basis of disease to translational and clinical research. In addition, articles relating to prevention, education, and behavior change will be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信