Effects of the Intervention "Reflective STRENGTH-Giving Dialogues" for Older Adults Living with Long-Term Pain: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.1 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2020-09-01 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7597524
Lena Hedén, Mia Berglund, Catharina Gillsjö
{"title":"Effects of the Intervention \"Reflective STRENGTH-Giving Dialogues\" for Older Adults Living with Long-Term Pain: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Lena Hedén, Mia Berglund, Catharina Gillsjö","doi":"10.1155/2020/7597524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term musculoskeletal pain is a major, often undertreated, disabling health problem among an increasing number of older adults. Reflective STRENGTH-giving dialogues (STRENGTH) may be a tool to support older adults living with long-term pain. The main aim of this pilot study was to investigate the immediate and longitudinal effect of the intervention STRENGTH on levels of pain, wellbeing, occurrence of depression symptoms, and sense of coherence (SOC) among community-dwelling older adults suffering from musculoskeletal pain compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was semiexperimental with an intervention group and a control group. The effect of a single STRENGTH intervention was reported on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) regarding pain and wellbeing. To evaluate the longitudinal effect of STRENGTH, using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), the Geriatric Depression Scale-20 (GDS-20), SOC-13 at baseline (T1), and six months after the intervention/no intervention (T2), a total of 30 older adults, aged 72 to 97 years (Mdn 86 years), were included consecutively and fulfilled the intervention series (<i>n</i> = 18) or untreated controls (<i>n</i> = 12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention with STRENGTH decreases pain (NRS 6 Mdn versus NRS 4 Mdn, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and increases wellbeing (NRS 7 Mdn versus NRS 8 Mdn, <i>p</i> < 0.001). After a six-month study period with STRENGTH, no longitudinal effect difference was found compared to baseline. Compared to the control group, there was an increasing trend between decreased pain level and increased SOC level for STRENGTH intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study supports STRENGTH's effect as a pain-alleviating model that provides a decrease in pain levels and an increase of wellbeing in older adults with long-term pain. STRENGTH dialogues could be a useful intervention to provide individually holistic care in older adults living with long-term pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7597524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/7597524","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7597524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Long-term musculoskeletal pain is a major, often undertreated, disabling health problem among an increasing number of older adults. Reflective STRENGTH-giving dialogues (STRENGTH) may be a tool to support older adults living with long-term pain. The main aim of this pilot study was to investigate the immediate and longitudinal effect of the intervention STRENGTH on levels of pain, wellbeing, occurrence of depression symptoms, and sense of coherence (SOC) among community-dwelling older adults suffering from musculoskeletal pain compared to a control group.

Methods: The study was semiexperimental with an intervention group and a control group. The effect of a single STRENGTH intervention was reported on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) regarding pain and wellbeing. To evaluate the longitudinal effect of STRENGTH, using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), the Geriatric Depression Scale-20 (GDS-20), SOC-13 at baseline (T1), and six months after the intervention/no intervention (T2), a total of 30 older adults, aged 72 to 97 years (Mdn 86 years), were included consecutively and fulfilled the intervention series (n = 18) or untreated controls (n = 12).

Results: The intervention with STRENGTH decreases pain (NRS 6 Mdn versus NRS 4 Mdn, p < 0.001) and increases wellbeing (NRS 7 Mdn versus NRS 8 Mdn, p < 0.001). After a six-month study period with STRENGTH, no longitudinal effect difference was found compared to baseline. Compared to the control group, there was an increasing trend between decreased pain level and increased SOC level for STRENGTH intervention.

Conclusions: This pilot study supports STRENGTH's effect as a pain-alleviating model that provides a decrease in pain levels and an increase of wellbeing in older adults with long-term pain. STRENGTH dialogues could be a useful intervention to provide individually holistic care in older adults living with long-term pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干预“反思力量给予对话”对老年人长期疼痛的影响:一项试点研究。
背景:在越来越多的老年人中,长期肌肉骨骼疼痛是一种主要的、经常治疗不足的致残性健康问题。反思给予力量对话(STRENGTH)可能是一种支持长期疼痛的老年人的工具。本初步研究的主要目的是研究与对照组相比,干预强度对社区居住的患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年人的疼痛水平、幸福感、抑郁症状的发生和连贯感(SOC)的直接和纵向影响。方法:采用半实验方法,分为干预组和对照组。在数字评定量表(NRS)上报告了单一强度干预对疼痛和健康的影响。为了评估STRENGTH的纵向效果,在基线(T1)和干预/不干预(T2) 6个月后,使用简短疼痛量表-短表(BPI-SF)、老年抑郁量表-20 (GDS-20)、SOC-13 (T1),连续纳入30名年龄在72至97岁(Mdn 86岁)的老年人,完成干预系列(n = 18)或未经治疗的对照组(n = 12)。结果:STRENGTH干预减轻疼痛(NRS 6 Mdn vs NRS 4 Mdn, p < 0.001)并增加幸福感(NRS 7 Mdn vs NRS 8 Mdn, p < 0.001)。经过六个月的STRENGTH研究期后,与基线相比,没有发现纵向影响差异。与对照组相比,STRENGTH干预组疼痛水平的降低和SOC水平的升高有上升趋势。结论:本初步研究支持STRENGTH作为一种疼痛缓解模型的效果,该模型可以减少老年人的疼痛水平,增加长期疼痛的幸福感。力量对话可能是一种有用的干预措施,为患有长期疼痛的老年人提供个人整体护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信