Cardioprotection for Acute MI in Light of the CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI Trial: New Targets Needed.

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2020-08-25 eCollection Date: 2020-04-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2020.01
Joel P Giblett, Heerajnarain Bulluck
{"title":"Cardioprotection for Acute MI in Light of the CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI Trial: New Targets Needed.","authors":"Joel P Giblett,&nbsp;Heerajnarain Bulluck","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury after revascularisation in acute myocardial infarction remains an enigma. Many targets have been identified, but after the failure of the recent Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Clinical Outcomes in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI) trial to show translation to clinical benefit, there is still no pharmacological or mechanical strategy that has translated to clinical practice. This article addresses the results of the CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI trial in the context of previous studies of ischaemic conditioning, and then considers the prospects for other potential targets of cardioprotection. Finally, the authors examine the pitfalls and challenges in trial design for future investigation of cardioprotective strategies. In particular, this article highlights the need for careful endpoint and patient selection, as well as the need to pay attention to the biology of cardioprotection during the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"15 ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/06/icr-15-e13.PMC7479528.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury after revascularisation in acute myocardial infarction remains an enigma. Many targets have been identified, but after the failure of the recent Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Clinical Outcomes in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI) trial to show translation to clinical benefit, there is still no pharmacological or mechanical strategy that has translated to clinical practice. This article addresses the results of the CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI trial in the context of previous studies of ischaemic conditioning, and then considers the prospects for other potential targets of cardioprotection. Finally, the authors examine the pitfalls and challenges in trial design for future investigation of cardioprotective strategies. In particular, this article highlights the need for careful endpoint and patient selection, as well as the need to pay attention to the biology of cardioprotection during the study.

Abstract Image

根据CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI试验,急性心肌梗死的心脏保护:需要新的靶点。
急性心肌梗死血运重建术后对缺血再灌注损伤的保护仍然是一个谜。已经确定了许多靶点,但在最近的远程缺血调节对st段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI)试验的临床结果的影响未能显示转化为临床益处之后,仍然没有药理学或机械策略转化为临床实践。本文将在先前缺血条件研究的背景下讨论CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI试验的结果,然后考虑其他潜在的心脏保护靶点的前景。最后,作者研究了未来研究心脏保护策略的试验设计中的陷阱和挑战。特别是,本文强调需要仔细选择终点和患者,以及在研究过程中需要注意心脏保护的生物学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信