Dentin to dentin adhesion using combinations of resin cements and adhesives from different manufacturers - a novel approach.

Elke Seitz, Carl Hjortsjö, Jon E Dahl, Erik Saxegaard
{"title":"Dentin to dentin adhesion using combinations of resin cements and adhesives from different manufacturers - a novel approach.","authors":"Elke Seitz,&nbsp;Carl Hjortsjö,&nbsp;Jon E Dahl,&nbsp;Erik Saxegaard","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1793677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were to present a novel method to analyse dentin bond strength and to evaluate the bond strength of combining adhesive systems and resin cement from different manufacturers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human wisdom teeth were ground flat to the dentin on parallel surfaces and axially cut into two parts. Dentin cylinders (Ø 3 mm) were drilled from one half of each tooth. The other half from each tooth was embedded in epoxy resin with the dentin surface exposed. The specimens were ground with silicone carbide paper and the dentin cylinders were cemented onto the dentin surface of the other half of the same tooth.<b>Materials:</b> Resin cement and adhesive systems from three different manufacturers were used in various combinations (<i>n</i> = 8 per group). Cement and adhesive from the same manufacturer served as control. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured and fracture modes were registered.<b>Results and conclusions:</b> The highest median SBS value was found in a bonding combination between cement and a non-corresponding adhesive (33.1 MPa) and one of the lowest values was found in one of the controls (15.3 MPa). Cohesive fractures were most frequent. The results indicated that combining adhesive and cement from different manufacturers did not compromise the dentin bonding. The novel test method is recommended for evaluating dentin bonding.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"96-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1793677","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1793677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to present a novel method to analyse dentin bond strength and to evaluate the bond strength of combining adhesive systems and resin cement from different manufacturers.

Methods: Human wisdom teeth were ground flat to the dentin on parallel surfaces and axially cut into two parts. Dentin cylinders (Ø 3 mm) were drilled from one half of each tooth. The other half from each tooth was embedded in epoxy resin with the dentin surface exposed. The specimens were ground with silicone carbide paper and the dentin cylinders were cemented onto the dentin surface of the other half of the same tooth.Materials: Resin cement and adhesive systems from three different manufacturers were used in various combinations (n = 8 per group). Cement and adhesive from the same manufacturer served as control. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured and fracture modes were registered.Results and conclusions: The highest median SBS value was found in a bonding combination between cement and a non-corresponding adhesive (33.1 MPa) and one of the lowest values was found in one of the controls (15.3 MPa). Cohesive fractures were most frequent. The results indicated that combining adhesive and cement from different manufacturers did not compromise the dentin bonding. The novel test method is recommended for evaluating dentin bonding.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

牙本质到牙本质的粘合使用树脂水泥和粘合剂的组合从不同的制造商-一种新的方法。
目的:本研究的目的是提出一种分析牙本质结合强度的新方法,并评估不同制造商的结合粘合剂系统和树脂水泥的结合强度。方法:将智齿与牙本质平行磨平,轴向切成两部分。从每颗牙齿的一半钻出牙本质圆柱体(Ø 3mm)。每颗牙齿的另一半被埋在环氧树脂中,露出牙本质表面。用碳化硅纸研磨试样,将牙本质圆柱体粘接在同一侧牙齿的牙本质表面。材料:来自三个不同制造商的树脂水泥和粘合剂系统以不同的组合使用(每组n = 8)。来自同一厂家的水泥和胶粘剂作为对照。测量了剪切粘结强度(SBS)并记录了断裂模式。结果与结论:中位SBS值在水泥与非相应粘接剂结合时最高(33.1 MPa),而在对照组中最低(15.3 MPa)。内聚性骨折最为常见。结果表明,不同生产厂家的胶粘剂和胶粘剂的结合不会影响牙本质的结合。本文推荐了一种评价牙本质结合的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信