Logistic Regression Model in a Machine Learning Application to Predict Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients with Worse Renal Function One Year after Kidney Transplant: Elderly KTbot.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2020-08-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7413616
Ubiracé Fernando Elihimas Júnior, Jamila Pinho Couto, Wallace Pereira, Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá, Eduardo Eriko Tenório de França, Filipe Carrilho Aguiar, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro Cabral, Saulo Barbosa Vasconcelos Alencar, Saulo José da Costa Feitosa, Thais Oliveira Claizoni Dos Santos, Helen Conceição Dos Santos Elihimas, Emilly Pereira Alves, Marcio José de Carvalho Lima, Frederico Castelo Branco Cavalcanti, Paulo Adriano Schwingel
{"title":"Logistic Regression Model in a Machine Learning Application to Predict Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients with Worse Renal Function One Year after Kidney Transplant: Elderly KTbot.","authors":"Ubiracé Fernando Elihimas Júnior,&nbsp;Jamila Pinho Couto,&nbsp;Wallace Pereira,&nbsp;Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá,&nbsp;Eduardo Eriko Tenório de França,&nbsp;Filipe Carrilho Aguiar,&nbsp;Diogo Buarque Cordeiro Cabral,&nbsp;Saulo Barbosa Vasconcelos Alencar,&nbsp;Saulo José da Costa Feitosa,&nbsp;Thais Oliveira Claizoni Dos Santos,&nbsp;Helen Conceição Dos Santos Elihimas,&nbsp;Emilly Pereira Alves,&nbsp;Marcio José de Carvalho Lima,&nbsp;Frederico Castelo Branco Cavalcanti,&nbsp;Paulo Adriano Schwingel","doi":"10.1155/2020/7413616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a public health problem worldwide. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for elderly patients' longevity and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary endpoint was to compare elderly versus younger KT recipients by analyzing the risk covariables involved in worsening renal function, proteinuria, graft loss, and death one year after KT. The secondary endpoint was to create a robot based on logistic regression capable of predicting the likelihood that elderly recipients will develop worse renal function one year after KT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Unicentric retrospective analysis of a cohort was performed with individuals aged ≥60 and <60 years old. We analysed medical records of KT recipients from January to December 2017, with a follow-up time of one year after KT. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for elderly vs younger recipients, controlled for demographic, clinical, laboratory, data pre- and post-KT, and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 elderly and 100 younger KT recipients were included. Pretransplant immune variables were similar between two groups. No significant differences (<i>P</i> > 0.05) between groups were observed after KT on laboratory data means and for the prevalences of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, polyomavirus, and urinary infections. One year after KT, the creatinine clearance was higher (<i>P</i> = 0.006) in youngers (70.9 ± 25.2 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) versus elderlies (53.3 ± 21.1 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). There was no difference in death outcome comparison. Multivariable analysis among covariables predisposing chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> presented a statistical significance for age ≥60 years (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and reduction in serum haemoglobin (<i>P</i> = 0.03). The model presented goodness-fit in the evaluation of artificial intelligence metrics (precision: 90%; sensitivity: 71%; and <i>F</i> <sub>1</sub> score: 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Renal function in elderly KT recipients was lower than in younger KT recipients. However, patients aged ≥60 years maintained enough renal function to remain off dialysis. Moreover, a learning machine application built a robot (Elderly KTbot) to predict in the elderly populations the likelihood of worse renal function one year after KT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7413616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/7413616","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7413616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a public health problem worldwide. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for elderly patients' longevity and quality of life.

Objectives: The primary endpoint was to compare elderly versus younger KT recipients by analyzing the risk covariables involved in worsening renal function, proteinuria, graft loss, and death one year after KT. The secondary endpoint was to create a robot based on logistic regression capable of predicting the likelihood that elderly recipients will develop worse renal function one year after KT.

Method: Unicentric retrospective analysis of a cohort was performed with individuals aged ≥60 and <60 years old. We analysed medical records of KT recipients from January to December 2017, with a follow-up time of one year after KT. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for elderly vs younger recipients, controlled for demographic, clinical, laboratory, data pre- and post-KT, and death.

Results: 18 elderly and 100 younger KT recipients were included. Pretransplant immune variables were similar between two groups. No significant differences (P > 0.05) between groups were observed after KT on laboratory data means and for the prevalences of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, polyomavirus, and urinary infections. One year after KT, the creatinine clearance was higher (P = 0.006) in youngers (70.9 ± 25.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) versus elderlies (53.3 ± 21.1 mL/min/1.73 m2). There was no difference in death outcome comparison. Multivariable analysis among covariables predisposing chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 presented a statistical significance for age ≥60 years (P = 0.01) and reduction in serum haemoglobin (P = 0.03). The model presented goodness-fit in the evaluation of artificial intelligence metrics (precision: 90%; sensitivity: 71%; and F 1 score: 0.79).

Conclusion: Renal function in elderly KT recipients was lower than in younger KT recipients. However, patients aged ≥60 years maintained enough renal function to remain off dialysis. Moreover, a learning machine application built a robot (Elderly KTbot) to predict in the elderly populations the likelihood of worse renal function one year after KT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

逻辑回归模型在机器学习应用中预测肾移植后一年内肾功能恶化的老年肾移植受者:老年KTbot。
背景:肾脏替代疗法(RRT)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。肾移植是提高老年患者寿命和生活质量的最佳治疗方法。目的:主要终点是通过分析KT术后一年内肾功能恶化、蛋白尿、移植物丢失和死亡的风险协变量,比较老年和年轻的KT受者。次要终点是创造一个基于逻辑回归的机器人,能够预测老年受者在KT后一年内肾功能恶化的可能性。方法:对年龄≥60岁的个体进行单中心回顾性分析,结果:包括18名老年人和100名年轻的KT接受者。两组移植前免疫指标相似。术后两组间糖尿病、高血压、急性排斥反应、巨细胞病毒、多瘤病毒、泌尿系统感染的发生率均无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。KT后1年,年轻人的肌酐清除率(70.9±25.2 mL/min/1.73 m2)高于老年人(53.3±21.1 mL/min/1.73 m2) (P = 0.006)。两组死亡结局比较无差异。慢性肾脏疾病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程2的多变量分析显示,年龄≥60岁(P = 0.01)和血清血红蛋白降低(P = 0.03)具有统计学意义。该模型在人工智能指标评估中表现出良好的拟合性(精度:90%;灵敏度:71%;f1得分:0.79)。结论:老年KT受者肾功能低于年轻KT受者。然而,≥60岁的患者维持了足够的肾功能,无需透析。此外,一个学习机应用程序建立了一个机器人(老年KTbot)来预测老年人在KT后一年内肾功能恶化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信