Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Experience in Close Relationship Scale 12 (ECR-12): an exploratory structural equation modeling study.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Agostino Brugnera, Cristina Zarbo, Benedetto Farina, Angelo Picardi, Andrea Greco, Gianluca Lo Coco, Giorgio A Tasca, Samantha Carlucci, Adalberto Auteri, Francesco Greco, Angelo Compare
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Experience in Close Relationship Scale 12 (ECR-12): an exploratory structural equation modeling study.","authors":"Agostino Brugnera,&nbsp;Cristina Zarbo,&nbsp;Benedetto Farina,&nbsp;Angelo Picardi,&nbsp;Andrea Greco,&nbsp;Gianluca Lo Coco,&nbsp;Giorgio A Tasca,&nbsp;Samantha Carlucci,&nbsp;Adalberto Auteri,&nbsp;Francesco Greco,&nbsp;Angelo Compare","doi":"10.4081/ripppo.2019.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR) is one of the most commonly used self-report instruments of adult attachment and has been widely adopted in psychotherapy research. Composed of two subscales, namely Attachment Avoidance and Anxiety, the ECR was recently shortened to a 12-items version, called the ECR-12. Given the importance of extending knowledge on its applicability in understudied populations, our aim was to validate the ECR-12 in a large sample of Italian native-speakers. A total of 1197 participants (73.2% females; mean age=28.53±11.37 years) completed the ECR-12. Each participant also completed other measures of attachment, psychopathology, interpersonal distress, coping strategies, and well-being. An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling analysis showed an excellent fit of the data, providing support for the two-dimensional orthogonal structure of the ECR-12. In addition, the measurement model was invariant across genders. Both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance subscales demonstrated good internal reliability, with McDonald's Omegas and Cronbach's Alphas above the suggested 0.8 cut-off. Finally, the Italian version of ECR-12 showed adequate convergent, concurrent, and divergent validity. Highly anxious individuals reported the highest levels of maladaptive interpersonal functioning and coping strategies, resulting in lower well-being. Interestingly, both attachment insecurity dimensions predicted higher levels of psychopathology, even after controlling for demographic variables and levels of self-reported relational difficulties. Given the good psychometric properties of the ECR-12, researchers and practitioners in Italy are encouraged to adopt the ECR-12 in their future research on adult attachment in psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44262,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","volume":"22 3","pages":"392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/ripppo.2019.392","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR) is one of the most commonly used self-report instruments of adult attachment and has been widely adopted in psychotherapy research. Composed of two subscales, namely Attachment Avoidance and Anxiety, the ECR was recently shortened to a 12-items version, called the ECR-12. Given the importance of extending knowledge on its applicability in understudied populations, our aim was to validate the ECR-12 in a large sample of Italian native-speakers. A total of 1197 participants (73.2% females; mean age=28.53±11.37 years) completed the ECR-12. Each participant also completed other measures of attachment, psychopathology, interpersonal distress, coping strategies, and well-being. An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling analysis showed an excellent fit of the data, providing support for the two-dimensional orthogonal structure of the ECR-12. In addition, the measurement model was invariant across genders. Both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance subscales demonstrated good internal reliability, with McDonald's Omegas and Cronbach's Alphas above the suggested 0.8 cut-off. Finally, the Italian version of ECR-12 showed adequate convergent, concurrent, and divergent validity. Highly anxious individuals reported the highest levels of maladaptive interpersonal functioning and coping strategies, resulting in lower well-being. Interestingly, both attachment insecurity dimensions predicted higher levels of psychopathology, even after controlling for demographic variables and levels of self-reported relational difficulties. Given the good psychometric properties of the ECR-12, researchers and practitioners in Italy are encouraged to adopt the ECR-12 in their future research on adult attachment in psychotherapy.

Abstract Image

意大利版亲密关系量表12 (ECR-12)的心理测量特性:一项探索性结构方程模型研究。
亲密关系体验量表(ECR)是最常用的成人依恋自我报告工具之一,在心理治疗研究中被广泛采用。ECR由两个子量表组成,即依恋回避和焦虑,最近被缩短为12个项目的版本,称为ECR-12。考虑到在未充分研究的人群中扩展其适用性知识的重要性,我们的目标是在大量意大利语母语人群中验证ECR-12。共1197名受试者(73.2%为女性;平均年龄=28.53±11.37岁)完成ECR-12。每位参与者还完成了依恋、精神病理学、人际困扰、应对策略和幸福感的其他测量。探索性结构方程模型分析表明,数据拟合良好,为ECR-12的二维正交结构提供了支持。此外,测量模型在不同性别之间是不变的。依恋焦虑和依恋回避两个分量表都显示出良好的内部信度,麦当劳的omega和Cronbach’s alpha都高于建议的0.8临界值。最后,意大利语版ECR-12表现出足够的收敛效度、并发效度和发散效度。高度焦虑的个体报告了最高水平的不适应人际功能和应对策略,导致较低的幸福感。有趣的是,即使在控制了人口统计变量和自我报告的关系困难水平之后,依恋不安全的两个维度都预示着更高的精神病理水平。鉴于ECR-12具有良好的心理测量特性,我们鼓励意大利的研究人员和从业人员在未来的心理治疗成人依恋研究中采用ECR-12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信