Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Rotational Atherectomy or Bypass Surgery in Chronic Hemodialysis and Severely Calcified Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion: A Case Report and Literature Review.

IF 2.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology Pub Date : 2020-08-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179546820951798
Kazuhiro Dan, Akira Shinoda, Hector M Garcia-Garcia
{"title":"Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Rotational Atherectomy or Bypass Surgery in Chronic Hemodialysis and Severely Calcified Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Kazuhiro Dan, Akira Shinoda, Hector M Garcia-Garcia","doi":"10.1177/1179546820951798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous observational studies and meta-analyses reported that the optimal strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] and bypass surgery) for anatomically complex coronary artery lesions in the chronic hemodialysis setting is still controversial because the long-term outcomes were superior with coronary artery bypass grafting, especially with regard to repeat revascularization; however, short-term mortality with PCI was significantly lower because it is less invasive. Moreover, no guidelines show a strategy for this setting. We report the case of a patient with chronic dialysis and calcified left main true bifurcation lesion who underwent staged PCI with rotational atherectomy and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for in-stent restenosis who died of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10419,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1179546820951798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/39/10.1177_1179546820951798.PMC7444146.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546820951798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous observational studies and meta-analyses reported that the optimal strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] and bypass surgery) for anatomically complex coronary artery lesions in the chronic hemodialysis setting is still controversial because the long-term outcomes were superior with coronary artery bypass grafting, especially with regard to repeat revascularization; however, short-term mortality with PCI was significantly lower because it is less invasive. Moreover, no guidelines show a strategy for this setting. We report the case of a patient with chronic dialysis and calcified left main true bifurcation lesion who underwent staged PCI with rotational atherectomy and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for in-stent restenosis who died of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

慢性血液透析和严重钙化左主干真分叉病变的分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旋转式粥样斑块切除术或搭桥手术:病例报告和文献综述。
以往的观察性研究和荟萃分析表明,对于慢性血液透析环境中解剖结构复杂的冠状动脉病变,冠状动脉血运重建的最佳策略(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[PCI]和搭桥手术)仍存在争议,因为冠状动脉搭桥术的长期疗效更好,尤其是在重复血运重建方面;但是,PCI 的短期死亡率明显更低,因为其创伤更小。此外,指南中也没有针对这种情况的治疗策略。我们报告了一例慢性透析和左主干真分叉病变钙化患者的病例,该患者因支架内再狭窄而接受了分期PCI、旋转式粥样斑块切除术和微创冠状动脉直接搭桥术,后因非闭塞性肠系膜缺血而死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信