Technical feasibility of constant-load and high-intensity interval training for cardiopulmonary conditioning using a re-engineered dynamic leg press.

BMC biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2019-10-03 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42490-019-0025-9
Farouk Chrif, Tobias Nef, Kenneth J Hunt
{"title":"Technical feasibility of constant-load and high-intensity interval training for cardiopulmonary conditioning using a re-engineered dynamic leg press.","authors":"Farouk Chrif, Tobias Nef, Kenneth J Hunt","doi":"10.1186/s42490-019-0025-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leg-press devices are one of the most widely used training tools for musculoskeletal strengthening of the lower-limbs, and have demonstrated important cardiopulmonary benefits for healthy and patient populations. Further engineering development was done on a dynamic leg-press for work-rate estimation by integrating force and motion sensors, power calculation and a visual feedback system for volitional work-rate control. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the enhanced dynamic leg press for cardiopulmonary exercise training in constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Five healthy participants aged 31.0±3.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) performed two cardiopulmonary training sessions: constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Participants carried out the training sessions at a work rate that corresponds to their first ventilatory threshold for constant-load training, and their second ventilatory threshold for high-intensity interval training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants tolerated both training protocols, and could complete the training sessions with no complications. Substantial cardiopulmonary responses were observed. The difference between mean oxygen uptake and target oxygen uptake was 0.07±0.34 L/min (103 ±17%) during constant-load training, and 0.35±0.66 L/min (113 ±27%) during high-intensity interval training. The difference between mean heart rate and target heart rate was -7±19 bpm (94 ±15%) during constant-load training, and 4.2±16 bpm (103 ±12%) during high-intensity interval training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The enhanced dynamic leg press was found to be feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise training, and for exercise prescription for different training programmes based on the ventilatory thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":72425,"journal":{"name":"BMC biomedical engineering","volume":"1 ","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0025-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leg-press devices are one of the most widely used training tools for musculoskeletal strengthening of the lower-limbs, and have demonstrated important cardiopulmonary benefits for healthy and patient populations. Further engineering development was done on a dynamic leg-press for work-rate estimation by integrating force and motion sensors, power calculation and a visual feedback system for volitional work-rate control. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the enhanced dynamic leg press for cardiopulmonary exercise training in constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Five healthy participants aged 31.0±3.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) performed two cardiopulmonary training sessions: constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Participants carried out the training sessions at a work rate that corresponds to their first ventilatory threshold for constant-load training, and their second ventilatory threshold for high-intensity interval training.

Results: All participants tolerated both training protocols, and could complete the training sessions with no complications. Substantial cardiopulmonary responses were observed. The difference between mean oxygen uptake and target oxygen uptake was 0.07±0.34 L/min (103 ±17%) during constant-load training, and 0.35±0.66 L/min (113 ±27%) during high-intensity interval training. The difference between mean heart rate and target heart rate was -7±19 bpm (94 ±15%) during constant-load training, and 4.2±16 bpm (103 ±12%) during high-intensity interval training.

Conclusions: The enhanced dynamic leg press was found to be feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise training, and for exercise prescription for different training programmes based on the ventilatory thresholds.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用重新设计的动态压腿机进行恒定负荷和高强度间歇训练以促进心肺功能调节的技术可行性。
背景:压腿装置是最广泛使用的下肢肌肉骨骼强化训练工具之一,对健康人群和病人的心肺功能有重要益处。通过整合力和运动传感器、功率计算和视觉反馈系统,我们对动态压腿器进行了进一步的工程开发,以估算工作速率。本研究旨在评估增强型动态压腿器在恒定负荷训练和高强度间歇训练中用于心肺运动训练的可行性。五名年龄为 31.0±3.9 岁(平均值±标准差)的健康参与者进行了两次心肺训练:恒定负荷训练和高强度间歇训练。在进行恒定负荷训练时,参与者的工作速率与他们的第一通气阈值相对应;在进行高强度间歇训练时,参与者的工作速率与他们的第二通气阈值相对应:结果:所有参与者都能耐受两种训练方案,并能顺利完成训练。观察到了显著的心肺反应。在恒定负荷训练中,平均摄氧量与目标摄氧量之差为 0.07±0.34 升/分钟(103 ±17%);在高强度间歇训练中,平均摄氧量与目标摄氧量之差为 0.35±0.66 升/分钟(113 ±27%)。在恒定负荷训练中,平均心率与目标心率的差值为-7±19 bpm(94±15%);在高强度间歇训练中,平均心率与目标心率的差值为4.2±16 bpm(103±12%):结论:研究发现,增强型动态压腿对心肺运动训练和根据通气阈值为不同训练计划制定运动处方是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信