Acceptability and Feasibility of Perioperative Music Listening: A Rapid Qualitative Inquiry Approach.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Breanna A Polascik, Daryl Jian An Tan, Karthik Raghunathan, Hwei Min Kee, Amanda Lee, Ban Leong Sng, Charles M Belden
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of Perioperative Music Listening: A Rapid Qualitative Inquiry Approach.","authors":"Breanna A Polascik,&nbsp;Daryl Jian An Tan,&nbsp;Karthik Raghunathan,&nbsp;Hwei Min Kee,&nbsp;Amanda Lee,&nbsp;Ban Leong Sng,&nbsp;Charles M Belden","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thaa014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perioperative music decreases pain, anxiety, and analgesia requirements while increasing patient satisfaction. We investigated the acceptability of perioperative music at a women's and children's hospital in Singapore, seeking to uncover barriers and facilitators to implementation in routine practice over a 12-week period. We used an undergraduate-led Rapid Qualitative Inquiry approach that includes data collection from multiple sources, iterative analysis, and additional data collection when necessary. Participants consisted of anesthesiologists and nurses working in the preoperative area, operating room, and postoperative recovery areas. In Stage 1, nurses and anesthesiologists answered a survey assessing attitudes and knowledge about perioperative music and attended a presentation introducing the intervention. In Stage 2, the results of the Stage 1 survey were disclosed, and nurses and anesthesiologists completed a second survey (Stage 1 survey questions with an additional query about implementation). Twenty-nine nurses were interviewed with semi-structured questions on barriers and facilitators to implementation. In Stage 3, nurses retook the Stage 2 survey after one month of implementation. The implementation of perioperative music was both acceptable and feasible in Singapore. The nurses' and anesthesiologists' acceptability increased over time with mostly positive qualitative feedback. Implementation barriers, including patient interest, timing of patient turnover, and added staff workload, appeared minor and could potentially be overcome by utilizing the intervention in the preoperative instead of postoperative area, deploying music in operating rooms with slower turnover, and evenly distributing staff workload. Local implementation stakeholders may make additional recommendations for scaling-up perioperative music interventions to fit other workflows while improving the patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jmt/thaa014","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thaa014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Perioperative music decreases pain, anxiety, and analgesia requirements while increasing patient satisfaction. We investigated the acceptability of perioperative music at a women's and children's hospital in Singapore, seeking to uncover barriers and facilitators to implementation in routine practice over a 12-week period. We used an undergraduate-led Rapid Qualitative Inquiry approach that includes data collection from multiple sources, iterative analysis, and additional data collection when necessary. Participants consisted of anesthesiologists and nurses working in the preoperative area, operating room, and postoperative recovery areas. In Stage 1, nurses and anesthesiologists answered a survey assessing attitudes and knowledge about perioperative music and attended a presentation introducing the intervention. In Stage 2, the results of the Stage 1 survey were disclosed, and nurses and anesthesiologists completed a second survey (Stage 1 survey questions with an additional query about implementation). Twenty-nine nurses were interviewed with semi-structured questions on barriers and facilitators to implementation. In Stage 3, nurses retook the Stage 2 survey after one month of implementation. The implementation of perioperative music was both acceptable and feasible in Singapore. The nurses' and anesthesiologists' acceptability increased over time with mostly positive qualitative feedback. Implementation barriers, including patient interest, timing of patient turnover, and added staff workload, appeared minor and could potentially be overcome by utilizing the intervention in the preoperative instead of postoperative area, deploying music in operating rooms with slower turnover, and evenly distributing staff workload. Local implementation stakeholders may make additional recommendations for scaling-up perioperative music interventions to fit other workflows while improving the patient experience.

围手术期音乐聆听的可接受性和可行性:快速定性调查方法。
围手术期音乐可以减少疼痛、焦虑和镇痛需求,同时提高患者满意度。我们调查了新加坡一家妇女和儿童医院围手术期音乐的可接受性,试图在12周的时间内发现常规实践中实施音乐的障碍和促进因素。我们使用了一种以本科生为主导的快速定性调查方法,包括从多个来源收集数据、迭代分析和必要时的额外数据收集。参与者包括在术前区、手术室和术后恢复区工作的麻醉师和护士。在第一阶段,护士和麻醉师回答了一项评估围手术期音乐的态度和知识的调查,并参加了介绍干预的演讲。在第二阶段,披露第一阶段调查的结果,护士和麻醉师完成第二次调查(第一阶段调查问题和关于实施的额外询问)。对29名护士进行了半结构化的访谈,问题涉及实施的障碍和促进因素。在第三阶段,护士在实施一个月后重新进行第二阶段的调查。围手术期音乐的实施在新加坡是可以接受和可行的。护士和麻醉师的可接受性随着时间的推移而增加,大多数是积极的定性反馈。实施障碍,包括患者兴趣、患者转移时间和增加的工作人员工作量,似乎不大,可以通过在术前而不是术后区域进行干预,在人员转移较慢的手术室部署音乐,以及均匀分配工作人员工作量来克服。当地实施利益相关者可能会对扩大围手术期音乐干预提出额外建议,以适应其他工作流程,同时改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信