João Matheus Bremm, Augusto César Cardoso-Dos-Santos, Vivyanne Santiago Magalhães, Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-Souza, Ronaldo Fernandes Santos Alves, Valdelaine Etelvina Miranda de Araujo, Eduardo Marques Macario, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira, Lavínia Schüler-Faccini, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França
{"title":"Congenital anomalies from the health surveillance perspective: compilation of a list based on ICD-10.","authors":"João Matheus Bremm, Augusto César Cardoso-Dos-Santos, Vivyanne Santiago Magalhães, Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-Souza, Ronaldo Fernandes Santos Alves, Valdelaine Etelvina Miranda de Araujo, Eduardo Marques Macario, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira, Lavínia Schüler-Faccini, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França","doi":"10.1590/S1679-49742020000500015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To propose a list of congenital anomalies having corresponding codes in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10thRevision (ICD-10), with the aim of applying it in health surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In December 2019, the following data sources were searched: ICD-10; ICD-11; anomalies monitored by three surveillance programs; and a database of rare diseases (Orphanet). Anomalies were retrieved from these data sources, processed to check for correspondence with ICD-10 and reviewed manually to compile the list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>898 codes were identified, of which 619 (68.9%) were contained in ICD-10 Chapter XVII. Of the 279 codes contained in other chapters, 19 were exclusive to the ICD-11 search, 72 to the surveillance programs, 79 to Orphanet and 36 to the search for terms in ICD-10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The codes contained in ICD-10 Chapter XVII do not capture the totality of congenital anomalies, indicating the need to adopt an expanded list.</p>","PeriodicalId":520611,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","volume":" ","pages":"e2020164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-49742020000500015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To propose a list of congenital anomalies having corresponding codes in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10thRevision (ICD-10), with the aim of applying it in health surveillance.
Methods: In December 2019, the following data sources were searched: ICD-10; ICD-11; anomalies monitored by three surveillance programs; and a database of rare diseases (Orphanet). Anomalies were retrieved from these data sources, processed to check for correspondence with ICD-10 and reviewed manually to compile the list.
Results: 898 codes were identified, of which 619 (68.9%) were contained in ICD-10 Chapter XVII. Of the 279 codes contained in other chapters, 19 were exclusive to the ICD-11 search, 72 to the surveillance programs, 79 to Orphanet and 36 to the search for terms in ICD-10.
Conclusion: The codes contained in ICD-10 Chapter XVII do not capture the totality of congenital anomalies, indicating the need to adopt an expanded list.