Dietary patterns according to vitamin supplement use. A cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Pollyanna Patriota, Idris Guessous, Pedro Marques-Vidal
{"title":"Dietary patterns according to vitamin supplement use. A cross-sectional study in Switzerland.","authors":"Pollyanna Patriota,&nbsp;Idris Guessous,&nbsp;Pedro Marques-Vidal","doi":"10.1024/0300-9831/a000679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: consumers of dietary supplements (DS) or vitamin-mineral supplements (VMS) have a better health profile than nonconsumers; whether this also applies to healthier dietary patterns has seldom been assessed. We aimed to assess the dietary intake of subjects according to their consumption of DS or VMS. <i>Methods</i>: Cross-sectional, population-based studies conducted in 2009-2012 (3773 participants, 52.4% women, 57.0 ± 10.0 years) and 2014-2017 (2536 participants, 52.4% women, 60.0 ± 10 years) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Dietary intake was assessed via a 97-item food frequency questionnaire. Nutrients, consumption of specific food groups, dietary scores, and compliance with the Swiss nutritional guidelines were compared between VMS/DS consumers and nonconsumers. <i>Results</i>: In 2009-2012, after multivariable adjustment for gender, age, body mass index, education, smoking, country of birth, sedentariness, diet and total energy intake, VMS/DS consumers had a higher score for the \"Fruits & vegetables\"(-0.09 ± 0.02 vs. 0.15 ± 0.05) dietary pattern and a lower score for the \"Fatty & sugary\" dietary pattern (0.02 ± 0.02 vs. -0.14 ± 0.04) and had a lower likelihood to comply with the guideline on total fat [odds ratio and 95 %CI: 0.72 (0.57-0.89)] than nonconsumers. In 2014-2017, after multivariable adjustment, no differences (at p < 0.005) were found between VMS/DS consumers and nonconsumers. <i>Conclusion</i>: VMS/DS consumers tend to have healthier dietary choices than nonconsumers. The beneficial effect of VMS and/or DS consumption is decreased, as it does not target subjects who really need them.</p>","PeriodicalId":13884,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","volume":"92 5-6","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: consumers of dietary supplements (DS) or vitamin-mineral supplements (VMS) have a better health profile than nonconsumers; whether this also applies to healthier dietary patterns has seldom been assessed. We aimed to assess the dietary intake of subjects according to their consumption of DS or VMS. Methods: Cross-sectional, population-based studies conducted in 2009-2012 (3773 participants, 52.4% women, 57.0 ± 10.0 years) and 2014-2017 (2536 participants, 52.4% women, 60.0 ± 10 years) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Dietary intake was assessed via a 97-item food frequency questionnaire. Nutrients, consumption of specific food groups, dietary scores, and compliance with the Swiss nutritional guidelines were compared between VMS/DS consumers and nonconsumers. Results: In 2009-2012, after multivariable adjustment for gender, age, body mass index, education, smoking, country of birth, sedentariness, diet and total energy intake, VMS/DS consumers had a higher score for the "Fruits & vegetables"(-0.09 ± 0.02 vs. 0.15 ± 0.05) dietary pattern and a lower score for the "Fatty & sugary" dietary pattern (0.02 ± 0.02 vs. -0.14 ± 0.04) and had a lower likelihood to comply with the guideline on total fat [odds ratio and 95 %CI: 0.72 (0.57-0.89)] than nonconsumers. In 2014-2017, after multivariable adjustment, no differences (at p < 0.005) were found between VMS/DS consumers and nonconsumers. Conclusion: VMS/DS consumers tend to have healthier dietary choices than nonconsumers. The beneficial effect of VMS and/or DS consumption is decreased, as it does not target subjects who really need them.

根据维生素补充剂使用的饮食模式。瑞士的一项横断面研究。
背景:膳食补充剂(DS)或维生素矿物质补充剂(VMS)的消费者比非消费者有更好的健康状况;这是否也适用于更健康的饮食模式很少被评估。我们的目的是评估受试者的膳食摄入量根据他们的消费DS或VMS。方法:2009-2012年在瑞士洛桑进行的横断面、基于人群的研究(3773名参与者,52.4%女性,57.0±10.0岁)和2014-2017年(2536名参与者,52.4%女性,60.0±10岁)。通过一份包含97个项目的食物频率问卷来评估饮食摄入量。在VMS/DS消费者和非消费者之间比较了营养素、特定食物组的消费、饮食评分和对瑞士营养指南的遵守情况。结果:在2009 - 2012年,在多变量调整性别、年龄、体重指数、教育、吸烟、出生地、久坐,饮食和总能量的摄入,vm / DS消费者有更高的分数“水果和蔬菜”(-0.09±0.02和0.15±0.05)饮食模式和一个较低的分数“脂肪和含糖饮食模式(0.02±0.02和-0.14±0.04),降低脂肪总量可能遵守指导方针(优势比,95%置信区间CI:0.72(0.57-0.89)]。2014-2017年,经多变量调整,无差异(p)。结论:VMS/DS消费者比非消费者有更健康的饮食选择。VMS和/或DS消耗的有益效果下降,因为它不是针对真正需要它们的受试者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1930 this journal has provided an important international forum for scientific advances in the study of nutrition and vitamins. Widely read by academicians as well as scientists working in major governmental and corporate laboratories throughout the world, this publication presents work dealing with basic as well as applied topics in the field of micronutrients, macronutrients, and non-nutrients such as secondary plant compounds. The editorial and advisory boards include many of the leading persons currently working in this area. The journal is of particular interest to: - Nutritionists - Vitaminologists - Biochemists - Physicians - Engineers of human and animal nutrition - Food scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信