{"title":"YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.","authors":"Kimberly Haslam, Heather Doucette, Shauna Hachey, Teanne MacCallum, Denise Zwicker, Martha Smith-Brilliant, Robert Gilbert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the potential value of YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrative review was performed to explore 3 questions: 1) What is the validity of health-related YouTube videos created for the public? 2) Are YouTube videos an effective tool for supporting the public in decision making regarding the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of disease? 3) How can health professionals ensure their videos will be readily accessible to those searching online for health-related information? Systematic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were conducted. The returns were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria and studies found were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight studies assessed the validity of videos on given topics and 9 studies examined the effectiveness of videos in supporting decision making. These studies demonstrated that the majority of health-related YouTube videos lack validity. However, evidence-based videos do exist and have the potential to be an effective instrument in supporting the public in making health decisions. Ten studies examined ways to increase the accessibility of such videos to the public.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Creators of evidence-based videos must take into consideration content and content-agnostic factors to improve the accessibility of their videos to searchers. Recommendations to support creators in making their evidence-based health videos readily accessible to the public are provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By exploiting appropriate content and content-agnostic factors, video creators can ensure that valid health information is readily accessible to information seekers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53470,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene","volume":"53 1","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533808/pdf/CanJDentHyg-53-1-53.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the potential value of YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public.
Methods: An integrative review was performed to explore 3 questions: 1) What is the validity of health-related YouTube videos created for the public? 2) Are YouTube videos an effective tool for supporting the public in decision making regarding the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of disease? 3) How can health professionals ensure their videos will be readily accessible to those searching online for health-related information? Systematic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were conducted. The returns were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria and studies found were critically appraised.
Results: Fifty-eight studies assessed the validity of videos on given topics and 9 studies examined the effectiveness of videos in supporting decision making. These studies demonstrated that the majority of health-related YouTube videos lack validity. However, evidence-based videos do exist and have the potential to be an effective instrument in supporting the public in making health decisions. Ten studies examined ways to increase the accessibility of such videos to the public.
Discussion: Creators of evidence-based videos must take into consideration content and content-agnostic factors to improve the accessibility of their videos to searchers. Recommendations to support creators in making their evidence-based health videos readily accessible to the public are provided.
Conclusions: By exploiting appropriate content and content-agnostic factors, video creators can ensure that valid health information is readily accessible to information seekers.
目的:确定YouTube视频作为公众健康决策辅助工具的潜在价值。方法:采用综合评价方法探讨3个问题:1)为公众创建的与健康相关的YouTube视频的有效性是什么?2) YouTube视频是支持公众对疾病的治疗、预防和诊断做出决策的有效工具吗?3)卫生专业人员如何确保在线搜索健康相关信息的人可以随时访问他们的视频?系统检索PubMed、CINAHL和Web of Science。使用纳入和排除标准对报告进行筛选,并对发现的研究进行严格评价。结果:58项研究评估了视频在给定主题上的有效性,9项研究检查了视频在支持决策方面的有效性。这些研究表明,大多数与健康相关的YouTube视频缺乏有效性。然而,以证据为基础的视频确实存在,并且有可能成为支持公众作出卫生决定的有效工具。十项研究探讨了如何增加公众对这类视频的可访问性。讨论:基于证据的视频的创作者必须考虑内容和内容不可知因素,以提高他们的视频对搜索者的可访问性。还提出了一些建议,以支持创作者将其基于证据的健康视频方便地提供给公众。结论:通过利用适当的内容和内容不可知因素,视频创作者可以确保有效的健康信息很容易被信息寻求者获取。
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene (CJDH), established in 1966, is the peer-reviewed research journal of the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. Published in February (electronic-only issue), June, and October, CJDH welcomes submissions in English and French on topics of relevance to dental hygiene practice, education, policy, and theory.