Hepatitis B birth vaccination, cohort study, Tunisia 2000-2017.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wafa Dhouib, Meriem Kacem, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Manel Ben Fredj, Hela Abroug, Imen Zemni, Souhir Chelly, Issam Maalel, Grira Said Samia, Asma Belguith Sriha
{"title":"Hepatitis B birth vaccination, cohort study, Tunisia 2000-2017.","authors":"Wafa Dhouib, Meriem Kacem, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Manel Ben Fredj, Hela Abroug, Imen Zemni, Souhir Chelly, Issam Maalel, Grira Said Samia, Asma Belguith Sriha","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2020.1809223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to compare the efficiency of the first dose of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine: at Birth versus at 3 months and to evaluate the efficacy of HB vaccine. We conducted a cohort study in the governorate of Monastir. Vaccinated Cohort (VC) included populations receiving the first dose at 3 months (Protocol 1), and at birth (HepB-BD) (Protocol 2). First dose was followed by at least two doses. We collected, from January 2000 to December 2017, cases diagnosed by serological markers (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBc). We calculated Absolute Risk (AR) per 100,000 PY and the Relative risk reduction (RRR). Twenty-five cases were notified among VC and 1501 cases among not vaccinated cohort (NVC). Twenty-three cases were notified among the cohort receiving the first dose at 3 months and two cases in Protocol 2. The AR per 100,000 PY was 5.67 (CI95%: 3.36-7.99) in Protocol 1 and 0.11 (CI95%: 0.001-0.26) in Protocol 2. The RRR was 77% (95% CI: 66; 85) in Protocol 1 and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9) in Protocol 2. We identified 4 HB cases for children aged between 5 and 11 who benefited from protocol 1 (born between 2000 and 2006) and zero cases for children of the same age group benefiting from protocol 2 (born between 2011 and 2017). The annual number of HB has decreased from 112 in 2000 to 48 in 2017. We predicted 40 new cases of HB in 2030. HepB-BD was 99.4% effective at preventing HB. The continuity of HepB-BD worldwide would achieve WHO's goal of eliminating HB as a threat to health by 2050.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AR: Absolute Risk; ARR: Absolute Risk Reduction; G1: Group1; G2: Group2; HB: Hepatitis B; HepB-BD: Hepatitis B Birth Dose; MENA: Middle East and North Africa; NNV: Number Needed to Vaccine; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; NVC: Not Vaccinated Cohort; PY: Person Year; RRR: Relative Risk Reduction; RR: Relative Risk; VC: Vaccinated Cohort; WHO: World Health Organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49910,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"1809223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/fd/ZLJM_15_1809223.PMC7482885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2020.1809223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to compare the efficiency of the first dose of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine: at Birth versus at 3 months and to evaluate the efficacy of HB vaccine. We conducted a cohort study in the governorate of Monastir. Vaccinated Cohort (VC) included populations receiving the first dose at 3 months (Protocol 1), and at birth (HepB-BD) (Protocol 2). First dose was followed by at least two doses. We collected, from January 2000 to December 2017, cases diagnosed by serological markers (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBc). We calculated Absolute Risk (AR) per 100,000 PY and the Relative risk reduction (RRR). Twenty-five cases were notified among VC and 1501 cases among not vaccinated cohort (NVC). Twenty-three cases were notified among the cohort receiving the first dose at 3 months and two cases in Protocol 2. The AR per 100,000 PY was 5.67 (CI95%: 3.36-7.99) in Protocol 1 and 0.11 (CI95%: 0.001-0.26) in Protocol 2. The RRR was 77% (95% CI: 66; 85) in Protocol 1 and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9) in Protocol 2. We identified 4 HB cases for children aged between 5 and 11 who benefited from protocol 1 (born between 2000 and 2006) and zero cases for children of the same age group benefiting from protocol 2 (born between 2011 and 2017). The annual number of HB has decreased from 112 in 2000 to 48 in 2017. We predicted 40 new cases of HB in 2030. HepB-BD was 99.4% effective at preventing HB. The continuity of HepB-BD worldwide would achieve WHO's goal of eliminating HB as a threat to health by 2050.

Abbreviations: AR: Absolute Risk; ARR: Absolute Risk Reduction; G1: Group1; G2: Group2; HB: Hepatitis B; HepB-BD: Hepatitis B Birth Dose; MENA: Middle East and North Africa; NNV: Number Needed to Vaccine; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; NVC: Not Vaccinated Cohort; PY: Person Year; RRR: Relative Risk Reduction; RR: Relative Risk; VC: Vaccinated Cohort; WHO: World Health Organization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

出生时接种乙型肝炎疫苗,队列研究,突尼斯,2000-2017 年。
我们的目的是比较出生时接种第一剂乙型肝炎 (HB) 疫苗和 3 个月时接种第一剂乙型肝炎 (HB) 疫苗的效率,并评估 HB 疫苗的功效。我们在莫纳斯提尔省开展了一项队列研究。接种队列(VC)包括在 3 个月时接种第一剂疫苗(方案 1)和在出生时接种第一剂疫苗(HepB-BD)(方案 2)的人群。第一剂后至少接种两剂。我们收集了 2000 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间通过血清学标志物(乙型肝炎表面抗原 (HBsAg) 和抗-HBc)确诊的病例。我们计算了每十万PY的绝对风险(AR)和相对风险降低率(RRR)。接种疫苗的人群中有 25 例,未接种疫苗的人群中有 1501 例。在 3 个月时接种第一剂的人群中有 23 例,在第二方案中有 2 例。在方案 1 中,每 100,000 PY 的 AR 为 5.67(CI95%:3.36-7.99),在方案 2 中为 0.11(CI95%:0.001-0.26)。方案 1 的 RRR 为 77% (95% CI: 66; 85),方案 2 为 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9)。我们在受益于方案 1 的 5-11 岁儿童(2000 年至 2006 年间出生)中发现了 4 例 HB 病例,而受益于方案 2 的同年龄组儿童(2011 年至 2017 年间出生)中则发现了 0 例 HB 病例。每年的 HB 例数已从 2000 年的 112 例降至 2017 年的 48 例。我们预测 2030 年将新增 40 例乙肝病例。乙肝疫苗预防乙肝的有效率为 99.4%。HepB-BD在全球范围内的持续应用将实现世卫组织到2050年消除HB对健康威胁的目标:缩写:AR:绝对风险;ARR:绝对风险降低;G1:第 1 组;G2:第 2 组;HB:肝炎:HB:乙型肝炎;HepB-BD:乙型肝炎出生剂量;MENA:中东和北非;NNV:需要接种人数;HIV:人类免疫缺陷病毒;NVC:未接种队列;PY:人年;RRR:相对风险降低率:RRR:相对风险降低率;RR:相对风险;VC:接种队列;WHO:世界卫生组织:世界卫生组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Libyan Journal of Medicine
Libyan Journal of Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Libyan Journal of Medicine (LJM) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access, international medical journal aiming to promote heath and health education by publishing high-quality medical research in the different disciplines of medicine. LJM was founded in 2006 by a group of enthusiastic Libyan medical scientists who looked at the contribution of Libyan publications to the international medical literature and saw that a publication outlet was missing. To fill this gap they launched LJM as a tool for transferring current medical knowledge to and from colleagues in developing countries, particularly African countries, as well as internationally.The journal is still led by a group of Libyan physicians inside and outside Libya, but it also enjoys support and recognition from the international medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信