Hepatitis B birth vaccination, cohort study, Tunisia 2000-2017.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wafa Dhouib, Meriem Kacem, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Manel Ben Fredj, Hela Abroug, Imen Zemni, Souhir Chelly, Issam Maalel, Grira Said Samia, Asma Belguith Sriha
{"title":"Hepatitis B birth vaccination, cohort study, Tunisia 2000-2017.","authors":"Wafa Dhouib, Meriem Kacem, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Manel Ben Fredj, Hela Abroug, Imen Zemni, Souhir Chelly, Issam Maalel, Grira Said Samia, Asma Belguith Sriha","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2020.1809223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to compare the efficiency of the first dose of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine: at Birth versus at 3 months and to evaluate the efficacy of HB vaccine. We conducted a cohort study in the governorate of Monastir. Vaccinated Cohort (VC) included populations receiving the first dose at 3 months (Protocol 1), and at birth (HepB-BD) (Protocol 2). First dose was followed by at least two doses. We collected, from January 2000 to December 2017, cases diagnosed by serological markers (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBc). We calculated Absolute Risk (AR) per 100,000 PY and the Relative risk reduction (RRR). Twenty-five cases were notified among VC and 1501 cases among not vaccinated cohort (NVC). Twenty-three cases were notified among the cohort receiving the first dose at 3 months and two cases in Protocol 2. The AR per 100,000 PY was 5.67 (CI95%: 3.36-7.99) in Protocol 1 and 0.11 (CI95%: 0.001-0.26) in Protocol 2. The RRR was 77% (95% CI: 66; 85) in Protocol 1 and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9) in Protocol 2. We identified 4 HB cases for children aged between 5 and 11 who benefited from protocol 1 (born between 2000 and 2006) and zero cases for children of the same age group benefiting from protocol 2 (born between 2011 and 2017). The annual number of HB has decreased from 112 in 2000 to 48 in 2017. We predicted 40 new cases of HB in 2030. HepB-BD was 99.4% effective at preventing HB. The continuity of HepB-BD worldwide would achieve WHO's goal of eliminating HB as a threat to health by 2050.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AR: Absolute Risk; ARR: Absolute Risk Reduction; G1: Group1; G2: Group2; HB: Hepatitis B; HepB-BD: Hepatitis B Birth Dose; MENA: Middle East and North Africa; NNV: Number Needed to Vaccine; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; NVC: Not Vaccinated Cohort; PY: Person Year; RRR: Relative Risk Reduction; RR: Relative Risk; VC: Vaccinated Cohort; WHO: World Health Organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/fd/ZLJM_15_1809223.PMC7482885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2020.1809223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to compare the efficiency of the first dose of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine: at Birth versus at 3 months and to evaluate the efficacy of HB vaccine. We conducted a cohort study in the governorate of Monastir. Vaccinated Cohort (VC) included populations receiving the first dose at 3 months (Protocol 1), and at birth (HepB-BD) (Protocol 2). First dose was followed by at least two doses. We collected, from January 2000 to December 2017, cases diagnosed by serological markers (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBc). We calculated Absolute Risk (AR) per 100,000 PY and the Relative risk reduction (RRR). Twenty-five cases were notified among VC and 1501 cases among not vaccinated cohort (NVC). Twenty-three cases were notified among the cohort receiving the first dose at 3 months and two cases in Protocol 2. The AR per 100,000 PY was 5.67 (CI95%: 3.36-7.99) in Protocol 1 and 0.11 (CI95%: 0.001-0.26) in Protocol 2. The RRR was 77% (95% CI: 66; 85) in Protocol 1 and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9) in Protocol 2. We identified 4 HB cases for children aged between 5 and 11 who benefited from protocol 1 (born between 2000 and 2006) and zero cases for children of the same age group benefiting from protocol 2 (born between 2011 and 2017). The annual number of HB has decreased from 112 in 2000 to 48 in 2017. We predicted 40 new cases of HB in 2030. HepB-BD was 99.4% effective at preventing HB. The continuity of HepB-BD worldwide would achieve WHO's goal of eliminating HB as a threat to health by 2050.

Abbreviations: AR: Absolute Risk; ARR: Absolute Risk Reduction; G1: Group1; G2: Group2; HB: Hepatitis B; HepB-BD: Hepatitis B Birth Dose; MENA: Middle East and North Africa; NNV: Number Needed to Vaccine; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; NVC: Not Vaccinated Cohort; PY: Person Year; RRR: Relative Risk Reduction; RR: Relative Risk; VC: Vaccinated Cohort; WHO: World Health Organization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

出生时接种乙型肝炎疫苗,队列研究,突尼斯,2000-2017 年。
我们的目的是比较出生时接种第一剂乙型肝炎 (HB) 疫苗和 3 个月时接种第一剂乙型肝炎 (HB) 疫苗的效率,并评估 HB 疫苗的功效。我们在莫纳斯提尔省开展了一项队列研究。接种队列(VC)包括在 3 个月时接种第一剂疫苗(方案 1)和在出生时接种第一剂疫苗(HepB-BD)(方案 2)的人群。第一剂后至少接种两剂。我们收集了 2000 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间通过血清学标志物(乙型肝炎表面抗原 (HBsAg) 和抗-HBc)确诊的病例。我们计算了每十万PY的绝对风险(AR)和相对风险降低率(RRR)。接种疫苗的人群中有 25 例,未接种疫苗的人群中有 1501 例。在 3 个月时接种第一剂的人群中有 23 例,在第二方案中有 2 例。在方案 1 中,每 100,000 PY 的 AR 为 5.67(CI95%:3.36-7.99),在方案 2 中为 0.11(CI95%:0.001-0.26)。方案 1 的 RRR 为 77% (95% CI: 66; 85),方案 2 为 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8; 99.9)。我们在受益于方案 1 的 5-11 岁儿童(2000 年至 2006 年间出生)中发现了 4 例 HB 病例,而受益于方案 2 的同年龄组儿童(2011 年至 2017 年间出生)中则发现了 0 例 HB 病例。每年的 HB 例数已从 2000 年的 112 例降至 2017 年的 48 例。我们预测 2030 年将新增 40 例乙肝病例。乙肝疫苗预防乙肝的有效率为 99.4%。HepB-BD在全球范围内的持续应用将实现世卫组织到2050年消除HB对健康威胁的目标:缩写:AR:绝对风险;ARR:绝对风险降低;G1:第 1 组;G2:第 2 组;HB:肝炎:HB:乙型肝炎;HepB-BD:乙型肝炎出生剂量;MENA:中东和北非;NNV:需要接种人数;HIV:人类免疫缺陷病毒;NVC:未接种队列;PY:人年;RRR:相对风险降低率:RRR:相对风险降低率;RR:相对风险;VC:接种队列;WHO:世界卫生组织:世界卫生组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信