Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization.

Tuomas E Tahko
{"title":"Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization.","authors":"Tuomas E Tahko","doi":"10.1093/bjps/axy044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biochemical kinds such as proteins pose interesting problems for philosophers of science, as they can be studied from the points of view of both biology and chemistry. The relationship between the biological functions of biochemical kinds and the microstructures that they are related to is the key question. This leads us to a more general discussion about ontological reductionism, microstructuralism, and multiple realization at the biology-chemistry interface. On the face of it, biochemical kinds seem to pose a challenge for ontological reductionism and hence motivate a dual theory of chemical and biological kinds, a type of pluralism about natural kinds. But it will be argued that the challenge, which is based on multiple realization, can be addressed. The upshot is that there are reasonable prospects for ontological reductionism about biochemical kinds, which corroborates natural kind monism. 1Introduction2Functions: Aetiological or Goal-Directed?3Moonlighting and Multiple Determinations4The Powers-Based Subset Strategy5The Case of Haemoglobin6Haemoglobin and the Problem of Lower-Level Vengeance7Multiple Realization and (Higher-Order) Interest Relativeness8The Prospects for Ontological Reductionism.</p>","PeriodicalId":509962,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"71 3","pages":"799-825"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/bjps/axy044","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Biochemical kinds such as proteins pose interesting problems for philosophers of science, as they can be studied from the points of view of both biology and chemistry. The relationship between the biological functions of biochemical kinds and the microstructures that they are related to is the key question. This leads us to a more general discussion about ontological reductionism, microstructuralism, and multiple realization at the biology-chemistry interface. On the face of it, biochemical kinds seem to pose a challenge for ontological reductionism and hence motivate a dual theory of chemical and biological kinds, a type of pluralism about natural kinds. But it will be argued that the challenge, which is based on multiple realization, can be addressed. The upshot is that there are reasonable prospects for ontological reductionism about biochemical kinds, which corroborates natural kind monism. 1Introduction2Functions: Aetiological or Goal-Directed?3Moonlighting and Multiple Determinations4The Powers-Based Subset Strategy5The Case of Haemoglobin6Haemoglobin and the Problem of Lower-Level Vengeance7Multiple Realization and (Higher-Order) Interest Relativeness8The Prospects for Ontological Reductionism.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

你从哪里获得蛋白质?或者:生化实现。
生物化学的种类,如蛋白质,对科学哲学家提出了有趣的问题,因为它们可以从生物学和化学的角度来研究。生物化学种类的生物学功能与其相关的微观结构之间的关系是关键问题。这使我们对本体论还原论、微观结构论和生物化学界面的多重实现进行了更广泛的讨论。从表面上看,生物化学种类似乎对本体论还原论提出了挑战,因此激发了化学和生物种类的二元理论,这是一种关于自然种类的多元主义。但我们认为,基于多重实现的挑战是可以解决的。其结果是生物化学种类的本体论还原论有合理的前景,这证实了自然种类一元论。功能:原因还是目标导向?4基于权力的子集策略;5血红蛋白的案例;6血红蛋白与低级报复问题;7多重实现与(高阶)利益相关性;8本体论还原论的展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信