Pharmaceutical Quality of Selected Metronidazole and Ciprofloxacin Infusions Marketed in South Eastern Nigeria.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2020-07-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S246050
Angus Nnamdi Oli, MaryRose Ukamaka Ibeabuchi, Ifeoma Bessie Enweani, Stephen Chijioke Emencheta
{"title":"Pharmaceutical Quality of Selected Metronidazole and Ciprofloxacin Infusions Marketed in South Eastern Nigeria.","authors":"Angus Nnamdi Oli,&nbsp;MaryRose Ukamaka Ibeabuchi,&nbsp;Ifeoma Bessie Enweani,&nbsp;Stephen Chijioke Emencheta","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S246050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmaceutical products need to be of good quality and it is even more critical when it comes to life saving medicaments like infusions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research surveyed the quality fitness of some ciprofloxacin and metronidazole infusion samples marketed in South-eastern of Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Official Compendial methods, microbiological quality, active pharmaceutical ingredients quantitation, pH and particle count tests were evaluated on eighty infusion bottles (from eight pharmaceutical companies) of each of the two drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the sixteen brands tested, 2 metronidazole brands and 1 ciprofloxacin brand (representing 18.75% of the total 16 brands/makes) were contaminated while the remaining 13 brands (81.25%) were found sterile. The active pharmaceutical ingredients quantitative assay showed that all the brands of ciprofloxacin infusion were between the 95% and 105% limit of label claim while one metronidazole brand has <95-110% limit label claim. Six brands each of the two drugs evaluated fall below the acceptable pH range [ciprofloxacin (3.5-4.6) and metronidazole (4.8-5.2)], while the other two brands of both drugs passed the test. In the antibacterial study, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were susceptible to the ciprofloxacin (5 µg). However, <i>Salmonella typhi</i> recorded inhibition zone diameters within resistant and intermediate range. <i>Peptostrepococcus</i> spp was susceptible (at minimum inhibitory concentrations of 100 µg/mL) to all the brands of metronidazole, while none of the brands were effective on <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. All the brands passed the test for particulate contamination. The particles size range was <10µm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About eighty-one percent (81.25%) of the infusions have acceptable good microbiological quality. However, 18.75% that failed the tests is a concern knowing that these are lifesaving products.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S246050","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S246050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical products need to be of good quality and it is even more critical when it comes to life saving medicaments like infusions.

Objective: This research surveyed the quality fitness of some ciprofloxacin and metronidazole infusion samples marketed in South-eastern of Nigeria.

Methods: Using Official Compendial methods, microbiological quality, active pharmaceutical ingredients quantitation, pH and particle count tests were evaluated on eighty infusion bottles (from eight pharmaceutical companies) of each of the two drugs.

Results: Out of the sixteen brands tested, 2 metronidazole brands and 1 ciprofloxacin brand (representing 18.75% of the total 16 brands/makes) were contaminated while the remaining 13 brands (81.25%) were found sterile. The active pharmaceutical ingredients quantitative assay showed that all the brands of ciprofloxacin infusion were between the 95% and 105% limit of label claim while one metronidazole brand has <95-110% limit label claim. Six brands each of the two drugs evaluated fall below the acceptable pH range [ciprofloxacin (3.5-4.6) and metronidazole (4.8-5.2)], while the other two brands of both drugs passed the test. In the antibacterial study, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli were susceptible to the ciprofloxacin (5 µg). However, Salmonella typhi recorded inhibition zone diameters within resistant and intermediate range. Peptostrepococcus spp was susceptible (at minimum inhibitory concentrations of 100 µg/mL) to all the brands of metronidazole, while none of the brands were effective on Lactobacillus spp. All the brands passed the test for particulate contamination. The particles size range was <10µm.

Conclusion: About eighty-one percent (81.25%) of the infusions have acceptable good microbiological quality. However, 18.75% that failed the tests is a concern knowing that these are lifesaving products.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

尼日利亚东南部市售部分甲硝唑和环丙沙星注射液的药品质量
背景:医药产品需要有良好的质量,当涉及到像输液这样的救命药物时,这一点就更加重要了。目的:调查尼日利亚东南部市场上部分环丙沙星、甲硝唑输液样品的质量适宜性。方法:采用官方药典方法,对8家制药公司各80瓶两种药物进行微生物学质量、活性成分定量、pH和颗粒计数等试验。结果:16个检测品牌中,2个甲硝唑品牌和1个环丙沙星品牌(占16个品牌/生产厂家的18.75%)被污染,其余13个品牌(占81.25%)无菌。有效成分定量分析结果显示,各品牌环丙沙星输液均在标签规定的95% ~ 105%范围内,其中1个甲硝唑品牌含铜绿假单胞菌,大肠杆菌对环丙沙星(5µg)敏感。然而,伤寒沙门氏菌的抑制区直径在耐药和中等范围内。所有品牌的甲硝唑对Peptostrepococcus spp均敏感(最低抑制浓度为100µg/mL),而对Lactobacillus spp均无效,所有品牌均通过颗粒污染检测。结论:约81%(81.25%)的注射剂具有良好的微生物质量。然而,18.75%的测试不合格是一个问题,因为知道这些是挽救生命的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信