Implementation of a protocol-driven pharmacy technician refill process at a large physician network.

IF 2.5
Elizabeth G Schlosser, Erica Neff, Suzanne M Francis, Hannah Vormohr, Ana L Hincapie
{"title":"Implementation of a protocol-driven pharmacy technician refill process at a large physician network.","authors":"Elizabeth G Schlosser,&nbsp;Erica Neff,&nbsp;Suzanne M Francis,&nbsp;Hannah Vormohr,&nbsp;Ana L Hincapie","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2020.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the implementation of a centrally located certified pharmacy technician (CPhT) team to streamline the process of approving medication refills for chronic disease state management within a multisite physician network.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary care (PC) offices within a large physician network.</p><p><strong>Practice description: </strong>Incoming medication refill requests from patients and community pharmacies were typically received at each PC office and processed by medical assistants, nurses, or providers.</p><p><strong>Practice innovations: </strong>A centralized team of CPhTs managed medication refill requests for 9 PC offices. Standardized protocols for 14 drug classes were built into the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Incoming medication refills were shifted from PC offices to the centrally located CPhT team.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>The implementation process was assessed through pharmacists' random audits and feedback from providers, office staff, and patients. Refill reports from January 2020 through March 2020 were obtained. Refill requests' characteristics were summarized and evaluated to determine the volume of refill requests, approved or denied requests, and requests requiring further PC staff analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes to the protocol process and EMR documentation included modifying or removing laboratory test value parameters, adjusting \"grace period\" refill quantity on the basis of the scheduled office visit date, and expanding the CPhT role to include communicating with patients and pharmacies regarding denied refills. Data showed that the CPhT team processed 81.7% of all refill requests. This averaged 215 requests per CPhT per day. Of the refill requests approved, 22.5% passed the protocol for the maximum quantity and refills permitted, and 17.3% were granted grace supplies until office visit protocol criteria were met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A CPhT team processed 81% of the medication refill requests for 9 PC offices with institution-approved EMR protocols and ambulatory pharmacist supervision. There were many barriers identified and addressed, but through continuous evaluation the workflow and protocol continue to improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":520694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA","volume":" ","pages":"e341-e348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.07.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the implementation of a centrally located certified pharmacy technician (CPhT) team to streamline the process of approving medication refills for chronic disease state management within a multisite physician network.

Setting: Primary care (PC) offices within a large physician network.

Practice description: Incoming medication refill requests from patients and community pharmacies were typically received at each PC office and processed by medical assistants, nurses, or providers.

Practice innovations: A centralized team of CPhTs managed medication refill requests for 9 PC offices. Standardized protocols for 14 drug classes were built into the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Incoming medication refills were shifted from PC offices to the centrally located CPhT team.

Evaluation: The implementation process was assessed through pharmacists' random audits and feedback from providers, office staff, and patients. Refill reports from January 2020 through March 2020 were obtained. Refill requests' characteristics were summarized and evaluated to determine the volume of refill requests, approved or denied requests, and requests requiring further PC staff analysis.

Results: Changes to the protocol process and EMR documentation included modifying or removing laboratory test value parameters, adjusting "grace period" refill quantity on the basis of the scheduled office visit date, and expanding the CPhT role to include communicating with patients and pharmacies regarding denied refills. Data showed that the CPhT team processed 81.7% of all refill requests. This averaged 215 requests per CPhT per day. Of the refill requests approved, 22.5% passed the protocol for the maximum quantity and refills permitted, and 17.3% were granted grace supplies until office visit protocol criteria were met.

Conclusion: A CPhT team processed 81% of the medication refill requests for 9 PC offices with institution-approved EMR protocols and ambulatory pharmacist supervision. There were many barriers identified and addressed, but through continuous evaluation the workflow and protocol continue to improve.

在大型医师网络中实现协议驱动的药房技术人员补充流程。
目的:描述一个集中定位的认证药房技术员(CPhT)团队的实施,以简化在多站点医生网络中批准慢性疾病状态管理的药物补充过程。环境:大型医师网络中的初级保健(PC)办公室。实践描述:来自患者和社区药房的药物补充请求通常由每个PC办公室接收,并由医疗助理、护士或提供者处理。实践创新:一个集中的cpht团队管理9个PC办公室的药物补充请求。电子病历(EMR)系统中建立了14种药物类别的标准化协议。药物补充从PC办公室转移到位于中心的CPhT团队。评估:通过药师的随机审计和提供者、办公室工作人员和患者的反馈来评估实施过程。获得2020年1月至2020年3月的补充报告。对重新填充请求的特征进行总结和评估,以确定重新填充请求的数量,批准或拒绝请求,以及需要PC人员进一步分析的请求。结果:方案流程和EMR文件的变化包括修改或删除实验室测试值参数,根据预定的办公室就诊日期调整“宽限期”补药数量,并扩大CPhT的作用,包括与患者和药房就拒绝补药进行沟通。数据显示,CPhT团队处理了81.7%的补充请求。平均每个CPhT每天有215个请求。在批准的补充请求中,22.5%通过了允许的最大数量和补充协议,17.3%在满足办公室访问协议标准之前获得了宽限期供应。结论:CPhT团队在机构批准的EMR协议和流动药剂师监督下处理了9个PC办公室81%的药物补充请求。已经确定并解决了许多障碍,但是通过持续的评估,工作流程和协议继续得到改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书