Clinical Prediction Score for Early Neuroimaging in Acquired Isolated Oculomotor Nerve Palsy.

IF 3.1 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye and Brain Pub Date : 2020-07-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/EB.S253305
Juthamat Witthayaweerasak, Natchada Tansuebchueasai, Nipat Aui-Aree
{"title":"Clinical Prediction Score for Early Neuroimaging in Acquired Isolated Oculomotor Nerve Palsy.","authors":"Juthamat Witthayaweerasak,&nbsp;Natchada Tansuebchueasai,&nbsp;Nipat Aui-Aree","doi":"10.2147/EB.S253305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An immediate neuroimaging investigation in patients with isolated oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) remains controversial. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction score to determine whether or not acquired isolated ONP patients require prompt imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed. Demographic data and clinical presentations were collected to determine predictive factors favored for early brain imaging using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven eyes of 96 patients diagnosed with isolated ONP were included. Forty-one eyes (42.3%) were caused by ischemia, while the other 56 eyes (57.7%) were caused by non-ischemic etiologies, namely aneurysm (n = 22), trauma (n = 18), inflammation (n = 5), tumor (n = 4), and others (n = 7). Eighty-two eyes (84.5%) had undergone neuroimaging study due to initially suspected non-ischemic causes. Only 36 (43.9%) revealed concordant diagnosis. The potential clinical predictors favored for neuroimaging using multivariate logistic regression analysis were age 10‒50 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.01, 95% CI: 1.25‒64.8), age 51‒70 years (aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 0.46‒6.35), history of head trauma (aOR 7.14, 95% CI: 1.19‒42.9), absence of vascular risk factors (aOR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.23‒12.1), and poor pupillary response (aOR 6.96, 95% CI: 1.99‒24.3). The predictor scores with an area under the ROC curve of 0.852 were 4, 1, 4, 3, and 4, respectively. The optimum cut-point was 3 for a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 44%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with acquired isolated ONP should be considered early neuroimaging studies when they are younger than 50 years old, have a history of head trauma, have no history of vascular risk factors, or have poor pupillary reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51844,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Brain","volume":"12 ","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/EB.S253305","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S253305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: An immediate neuroimaging investigation in patients with isolated oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) remains controversial. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction score to determine whether or not acquired isolated ONP patients require prompt imaging.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Demographic data and clinical presentations were collected to determine predictive factors favored for early brain imaging using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Ninety-seven eyes of 96 patients diagnosed with isolated ONP were included. Forty-one eyes (42.3%) were caused by ischemia, while the other 56 eyes (57.7%) were caused by non-ischemic etiologies, namely aneurysm (n = 22), trauma (n = 18), inflammation (n = 5), tumor (n = 4), and others (n = 7). Eighty-two eyes (84.5%) had undergone neuroimaging study due to initially suspected non-ischemic causes. Only 36 (43.9%) revealed concordant diagnosis. The potential clinical predictors favored for neuroimaging using multivariate logistic regression analysis were age 10‒50 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.01, 95% CI: 1.25‒64.8), age 51‒70 years (aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 0.46‒6.35), history of head trauma (aOR 7.14, 95% CI: 1.19‒42.9), absence of vascular risk factors (aOR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.23‒12.1), and poor pupillary response (aOR 6.96, 95% CI: 1.99‒24.3). The predictor scores with an area under the ROC curve of 0.852 were 4, 1, 4, 3, and 4, respectively. The optimum cut-point was 3 for a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 44%.

Conclusion: Patients with acquired isolated ONP should be considered early neuroimaging studies when they are younger than 50 years old, have a history of head trauma, have no history of vascular risk factors, or have poor pupillary reaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

获得性孤立性动眼神经麻痹早期神经影像学预测评分。
目的:孤立性动眼神经麻痹(ONP)患者的即时神经影像学调查仍然存在争议。我们的目的是建立一个临床预测评分,以确定获得性孤立性ONP患者是否需要及时影像学检查。方法:回顾性研究。收集人口统计数据和临床表现,利用多变量logistic回归分析确定有利于早期脑成像的预测因素。结果:96例确诊为孤立性ONP的患者中97只眼入选。41只眼(42.3%)为缺血所致,56只眼(57.7%)为非缺血性病因所致,分别为动脉瘤(22只)、外伤(18只)、炎症(5只)、肿瘤(4只)及其他(7只)。82只眼(84.5%)因初步怀疑非缺血性病因而行神经影像学检查。只有36例(43.9%)诊断一致。多因素logistic回归分析支持神经影像学的潜在临床预测因子为10-50岁(调整比值比[aOR] 9.01, 95% CI: 1.25-64.8)、51-70岁(aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 0.46-6.35)、头部外伤史(aOR 7.14, 95% CI: 1.19-42.9)、无血管危险因素(aOR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.23-12.1)和瞳孔反应差(aOR 6.96, 95% CI: 1.99-24.3)。ROC曲线下面积为0.852的预测因子得分分别为4、1、4、3、4。最佳切割点为3,灵敏度为96%,特异性为44%。结论:获得性孤立性ONP患者年龄小于50岁、有头部外伤史、无血管危险因素史或瞳孔反应差者应考虑早期神经影像学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eye and Brain
Eye and Brain OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Brain is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on basic research, clinical findings, and expert reviews in the field of visual science and neuro-ophthalmology. The journal’s unique focus is the link between two well-known visual centres, the eye and the brain, with an emphasis on the importance of such connections. All aspects of clinical and especially basic research on the visual system are addressed within the journal as well as significant future directions in vision research and therapeutic measures. This unique journal focuses on neurological aspects of vision – both physiological and pathological. The scope of the journal spans from the cornea to the associational visual cortex and all the visual centers in between. Topics range from basic biological mechanisms to therapeutic treatment, from simple organisms to humans, and utilizing techniques from molecular biology to behavior. The journal especially welcomes primary research articles or review papers that make the connection between the eye and the brain. Specific areas covered in the journal include: Physiology and pathophysiology of visual centers, Eye movement disorders and strabismus, Cellular, biochemical, and molecular features of the visual system, Structural and functional organization of the eye and of the visual cortex, Metabolic demands of the visual system, Diseases and disorders with neuro-ophthalmic manifestations, Clinical and experimental neuro-ophthalmology and visual system pathologies, Epidemiological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信