Evaluation of the Bethesda System and the ACR TIRADS in an Endemic Goiter Region.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Endocrine Research Pub Date : 2020-11-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-30 DOI:10.1080/07435800.2020.1799226
Mustafa Karaagac, Talha Sarigoz, Tamer Ertan, Omer Topuz
{"title":"Evaluation of the Bethesda System and the ACR TIRADS in an Endemic Goiter Region.","authors":"Mustafa Karaagac,&nbsp;Talha Sarigoz,&nbsp;Tamer Ertan,&nbsp;Omer Topuz","doi":"10.1080/07435800.2020.1799226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various factors can affect incidence of thyroid disorders and disease profiles may show abrupt changes in endemic goitrous areas. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) in terms of risk of malignancy and general recommendations in an endemic goiter region (EGR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 500 patients who had thyroidectomy following thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy were enrolled. For the assessment of thyroid cytology, BSRTC was used and for the evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules, ACR TIRADS lexicon was adopted. For the assessment of thyroid cytology, Bethesda classification was used and for the evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules, ACR TIRADS lexicon was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the EGR setting, benign category of BSRTC had a cancer risk of 6.2% which was two times more than the 2017 BSRTC revision reported. Nodules 10-14.9 mm in diameter had nearly 4 times higher malignancy risk than nodules >15 mm. In this group of patients, the risk of malignancy for TIRADS level 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 was 1.16%, 2.94%, 7%, 45.64% and 94.44%, respectively. The malignancy rates for Bethesda system category I, II, III, IV, V and VI were as follows: 14.43%, 6.2%, 19.05%, 36.73%, 75.68% and 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are slight differences between the common set of standards and this study results regarding risk of malignancy. This brings up the question whether there is need for revision for the use of categories and the appropriate management in endemic goiter regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11601,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07435800.2020.1799226","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07435800.2020.1799226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Various factors can affect incidence of thyroid disorders and disease profiles may show abrupt changes in endemic goitrous areas. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) in terms of risk of malignancy and general recommendations in an endemic goiter region (EGR).

Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 500 patients who had thyroidectomy following thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy were enrolled. For the assessment of thyroid cytology, BSRTC was used and for the evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules, ACR TIRADS lexicon was adopted. For the assessment of thyroid cytology, Bethesda classification was used and for the evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules, ACR TIRADS lexicon was adopted.

Results: In the EGR setting, benign category of BSRTC had a cancer risk of 6.2% which was two times more than the 2017 BSRTC revision reported. Nodules 10-14.9 mm in diameter had nearly 4 times higher malignancy risk than nodules >15 mm. In this group of patients, the risk of malignancy for TIRADS level 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 was 1.16%, 2.94%, 7%, 45.64% and 94.44%, respectively. The malignancy rates for Bethesda system category I, II, III, IV, V and VI were as follows: 14.43%, 6.2%, 19.05%, 36.73%, 75.68% and 100%.

Conclusions: There are slight differences between the common set of standards and this study results regarding risk of malignancy. This brings up the question whether there is need for revision for the use of categories and the appropriate management in endemic goiter regions.

某地方性甲状腺肿区Bethesda系统与ACR TIRADS的评价。
背景:多种因素可影响甲状腺疾病的发病率,疾病概况可能在地方性甲状腺肿区表现出突变。本研究旨在分析美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)和Bethesda甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(BSRTC)在恶性肿瘤风险方面的差异,以及在特性性甲状腺肿区(EGR)的一般建议。方法:本回顾性研究纳入500例甲状腺细针穿刺活检后行甲状腺切除术的患者。甲状腺细胞学评价采用BSRTC,甲状腺结节超声特征评价采用ACR TIRADS词典。甲状腺细胞学评价采用Bethesda分类,甲状腺结节超声特征评价采用ACR TIRADS词典。结果:在EGR环境下,BSRTC良性分类的癌症风险为6.2%,是2017年BSRTC修订报告的两倍。直径10 ~ 14.9 mm的结节与>15 mm的结节相比,其恶性风险高出近4倍。在本组患者中,TIRADS 1、2、3、4、5级患者发生恶性肿瘤的风险分别为1.16%、2.94%、7%、45.64%和94.44%。Bethesda系统I、II、III、IV、V、VI类肿瘤恶性率分别为14.43%、6.2%、19.05%、36.73%、75.68%、100%。结论:在恶性肿瘤风险方面,通用标准与本研究结果之间存在细微差异。这就提出了一个问题,即是否需要修订分类的使用和在地方性甲状腺肿地区的适当管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Research
Endocrine Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles relating to endocrinology in the broadest context. Subjects of interest include: receptors and mechanism of action of hormones, methodological advances in the detection and measurement of hormones; structure and chemical properties of hormones. Invitations to submit Brief Reviews are issued to specific authors by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信