Construct validity of the Actiwatch-2 for assessing movement in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Helena J M van Alphen, Aly Waninge, Alexander E M G Minnaert, Wendy J Post, Annette A J van der Putten
{"title":"Construct validity of the Actiwatch-2 for assessing movement in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.","authors":"Helena J M van Alphen,&nbsp;Aly Waninge,&nbsp;Alexander E M G Minnaert,&nbsp;Wendy J Post,&nbsp;Annette A J van der Putten","doi":"10.1111/jar.12789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valid measures to assess either small or assisted performed movements of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) are required. We analysed the construct validity of the Actiwatch-2 to assess movement in people with PIMD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-two persons with PIMD were video recorded while wearing an Actiwatch-2. We used 15s-partial-interval recording to record upper body movement, body position and activity situation. Multilevel analyses were used to evaluate if the Actiwatch-2, based on produced counts, could detect changes in these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence versus absence of upper body movement and an activity situation in which participants were involved versus not involved resulted in significantly higher counts, with a large variety in predicted counts between participants. No relationship between body position and counts was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Actiwatch-2 seems able to assess obvious upper body movement in people with PIMD, and whether there is involvement in an activity situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"34 1","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12789","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Valid measures to assess either small or assisted performed movements of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) are required. We analysed the construct validity of the Actiwatch-2 to assess movement in people with PIMD.

Method: Twenty-two persons with PIMD were video recorded while wearing an Actiwatch-2. We used 15s-partial-interval recording to record upper body movement, body position and activity situation. Multilevel analyses were used to evaluate if the Actiwatch-2, based on produced counts, could detect changes in these factors.

Results: The presence versus absence of upper body movement and an activity situation in which participants were involved versus not involved resulted in significantly higher counts, with a large variety in predicted counts between participants. No relationship between body position and counts was found.

Conclusions: The Actiwatch-2 seems able to assess obvious upper body movement in people with PIMD, and whether there is involvement in an activity situation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Actiwatch-2用于评估重度智障及多重残障人士运动的建构效度。
背景:需要有效的措施来评估重度智力和多重残疾(PIMD)患者的小动作或辅助动作。我们分析了Actiwatch-2的结构效度来评估PIMD患者的运动。方法:对22例PIMD患者佩戴Actiwatch-2进行录像。采用15秒半间隔记录上肢运动、体位和活动情况。采用多水平分析来评估Actiwatch-2是否能够根据产生的计数检测到这些因素的变化。结果:上半身运动的存在与不存在以及参与者参与与不参与的活动情况导致计数显着增加,参与者之间的预测计数差异很大。体位与计数没有关系。结论:Actiwatch-2似乎能够评估PIMD患者明显的上半身运动,以及是否参与活动情境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信