Waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio and overweight cut-off points: a cross-sectional study with elderly people in seven Brazilian cities, 2008-2009.

Daniela de Assumpção, Rosemeire de Olanda Ferraz, Flávia Silva Arbex Borim, Anita Liberalesso Neri, Priscila Maria Stolses Bergamo Francisco
{"title":"Waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio and overweight cut-off points: a cross-sectional study with elderly people in seven Brazilian cities, 2008-2009.","authors":"Daniela de Assumpção,&nbsp;Rosemeire de Olanda Ferraz,&nbsp;Flávia Silva Arbex Borim,&nbsp;Anita Liberalesso Neri,&nbsp;Priscila Maria Stolses Bergamo Francisco","doi":"10.5123/s1679-49742020000300003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective to identify cut-off points for waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with better sensitivity, specificity and accuracy to distinguish overweight elderly people by sex, using three body mass index criteria as anthropometric references. Methods this was a cross-sectional study that analyzed weight, height and WC measurements of 3,477 elderly people (2008-2009); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define the cut-off points. Results WC cut-off points were 86.5cm, 88.7cm and 91.5cm in women, and 93.0cm, 96.0cm and 97.5cm in men, according to World Health Organization/WHO, Nutrition Screening Initiative/NSI and Pan American Health Organization/PAHO criteria, respectively; WHtR cut-off points corresponded to 0.57, 0.58, 0.59 in the female sex, and 0.56, 0.58 and 0.59 in the male sex; highest absolute overall accuracy values: PAHO (men) and WHO (women). Conclusion WC and WHtR cut-off points were similar, regardless of the BMI criterion adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":520611,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","volume":" ","pages":"e2019502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742020000300003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective to identify cut-off points for waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with better sensitivity, specificity and accuracy to distinguish overweight elderly people by sex, using three body mass index criteria as anthropometric references. Methods this was a cross-sectional study that analyzed weight, height and WC measurements of 3,477 elderly people (2008-2009); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define the cut-off points. Results WC cut-off points were 86.5cm, 88.7cm and 91.5cm in women, and 93.0cm, 96.0cm and 97.5cm in men, according to World Health Organization/WHO, Nutrition Screening Initiative/NSI and Pan American Health Organization/PAHO criteria, respectively; WHtR cut-off points corresponded to 0.57, 0.58, 0.59 in the female sex, and 0.56, 0.58 and 0.59 in the male sex; highest absolute overall accuracy values: PAHO (men) and WHO (women). Conclusion WC and WHtR cut-off points were similar, regardless of the BMI criterion adopted.

腰围、腰高比和超重分界点:2008-2009年巴西七个城市老年人的横断面研究。
目的以3种体重指数标准作为人体测量参考,寻找灵敏度、特异性和准确性较好的腰围(WC)和腰高比(WHtR)分界点,用于区分性别超重老年人。方法采用横断面研究方法,对2008-2009年3477名老年人的体重、身高和腰围进行分析;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定分界点。结果根据世界卫生组织/WHO、营养筛查倡议/NSI和泛美卫生组织/PAHO标准,女性WC分界点分别为86.5cm、88.7cm和91.5cm,男性WC分界点分别为93.0cm、96.0cm和97.5cm;女性的WHtR截断点分别为0.57、0.58、0.59,男性为0.56、0.58、0.59;最高绝对总体准确度值:泛美卫生组织(男性)和世卫组织(女性)。结论无论采用何种BMI标准,WC和WHtR分界点相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信