Chondrogenic Predifferentiation Inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Angiogenic Effect in Pericranium-Derived Spheroids.

Tissue Engineering Part A Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-05 DOI:10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0117
Serban San-Marina, Christopher M Prummer, Stephen G Voss, Danielle E Hunter, Benjamin J Madden, Mary Cristine Charlesworth, Dale C Ekbom, Jeffrey R Janus
{"title":"Chondrogenic Predifferentiation Inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Angiogenic Effect in Pericranium-Derived Spheroids.","authors":"Serban San-Marina,&nbsp;Christopher M Prummer,&nbsp;Stephen G Voss,&nbsp;Danielle E Hunter,&nbsp;Benjamin J Madden,&nbsp;Mary Cristine Charlesworth,&nbsp;Dale C Ekbom,&nbsp;Jeffrey R Janus","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Craniofacial reconstruction of critical bone defects typically requires a bone graft. As graft availability may be restricted by disease or comorbidities, tissue engineering approaches are actively sought. The pericranium could provide new bone graft material. During development and repair, bone transitions through a chondrogenic phase. However, with tissue engineering, pluripotent cells can differentiate directly into bone cells. Does ability to recapitulate bone formation <i>in vitro</i> affect osteogenesis and vascularization of pericranium grafts? To answer this, we obtained tissue from nine patients with preplanned craniotomy surgery and studied three-dimensional osteogenesis and angiogenesis of pericranium-derived spheroids. First, we established growth and differentiation conditions on Matrigel. For each spheroid sample, we investigated (i) continuous osteogenic differentiation (COD) and (ii) osteogenic differentiation preceded by chondrogenesis (CD → OD). The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was compared to VEGF supplemented with fibroblast growth factor, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, platelet-derived growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor-α, a growth factor mix (GFM) with possible synergistic effects. In this limited sample, we observed no age- or sex-related differences in cell expansion. Similarly, no statistically significant differences in osteogenic or angiogenic scores between COD or CD → OD spheroids were noted with regular media. In COD, however, VEGF statistically significantly increased angiogenesis compared to control media (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Also, in COD, both VEGF and VEGF + GFM increased osteogenesis (<i>p</i> = 0.047 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). By contrast, in CD → OD, neither VEGF nor VEGF + GFM yielded statistically significant angiogenesis or osteogenesis scores compared to control media. To understand these results, we characterized spheroid protein expression by nanoliquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Nine angiogenic proteins were either uniquely expressed or upregulated in COD compared to CD → OD: (i) endothelial markers JUP, PTGIS, PTGS2, and TYMP, (ii) tissue remodeling factors CHI3L1 and MMP14, and (iii) metabolic pathways modulators ANGPTL4, ITGA5, and WNT5A. ANGPTL4, ITGA5, PTGIS, PTGS2, and WNT5A define a conserved angiogenic network and were >2-fold increased in VEGF compared to VEGF + GFM. Finally, we examined bone formation on printable poly-(propylene-fumarate) (PPF) scaffolds for individualized grafting. Under COD + VEGF conditions, PPF scaffolds loaded with pericranium-derived cells displayed hallmarks of spongiform-like bone formation. Thus, the human pericranium may be a potential repository for bone-generating cells with applications in craniofacial bone repair using tissue printing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23133,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering Part A","volume":" ","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0117","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering Part A","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Craniofacial reconstruction of critical bone defects typically requires a bone graft. As graft availability may be restricted by disease or comorbidities, tissue engineering approaches are actively sought. The pericranium could provide new bone graft material. During development and repair, bone transitions through a chondrogenic phase. However, with tissue engineering, pluripotent cells can differentiate directly into bone cells. Does ability to recapitulate bone formation in vitro affect osteogenesis and vascularization of pericranium grafts? To answer this, we obtained tissue from nine patients with preplanned craniotomy surgery and studied three-dimensional osteogenesis and angiogenesis of pericranium-derived spheroids. First, we established growth and differentiation conditions on Matrigel. For each spheroid sample, we investigated (i) continuous osteogenic differentiation (COD) and (ii) osteogenic differentiation preceded by chondrogenesis (CD → OD). The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was compared to VEGF supplemented with fibroblast growth factor, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, platelet-derived growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor-α, a growth factor mix (GFM) with possible synergistic effects. In this limited sample, we observed no age- or sex-related differences in cell expansion. Similarly, no statistically significant differences in osteogenic or angiogenic scores between COD or CD → OD spheroids were noted with regular media. In COD, however, VEGF statistically significantly increased angiogenesis compared to control media (p = 0.007). Also, in COD, both VEGF and VEGF + GFM increased osteogenesis (p = 0.047 and p = 0.038, respectively). By contrast, in CD → OD, neither VEGF nor VEGF + GFM yielded statistically significant angiogenesis or osteogenesis scores compared to control media. To understand these results, we characterized spheroid protein expression by nanoliquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Nine angiogenic proteins were either uniquely expressed or upregulated in COD compared to CD → OD: (i) endothelial markers JUP, PTGIS, PTGS2, and TYMP, (ii) tissue remodeling factors CHI3L1 and MMP14, and (iii) metabolic pathways modulators ANGPTL4, ITGA5, and WNT5A. ANGPTL4, ITGA5, PTGIS, PTGS2, and WNT5A define a conserved angiogenic network and were >2-fold increased in VEGF compared to VEGF + GFM. Finally, we examined bone formation on printable poly-(propylene-fumarate) (PPF) scaffolds for individualized grafting. Under COD + VEGF conditions, PPF scaffolds loaded with pericranium-derived cells displayed hallmarks of spongiform-like bone formation. Thus, the human pericranium may be a potential repository for bone-generating cells with applications in craniofacial bone repair using tissue printing.

软骨预分化抑制血管内皮生长因子在包皮衍生球体中的血管生成作用。
严重骨缺损的颅面重建通常需要骨移植。由于移植物的可用性可能受到疾病或合并症的限制,组织工程方法正在积极寻求。颅周可提供新的骨移植材料。在发育和修复过程中,骨会经历成软骨期。然而,通过组织工程,多能细胞可以直接分化为骨细胞。体外再现骨形成的能力是否影响骨周移植物的成骨和血管化?为了回答这个问题,我们从9例预先计划开颅手术的患者身上获得了组织,并研究了包皮衍生球体的三维成骨和血管生成。首先,我们在Matrigel上建立了生长和分化条件。对于每个球体样本,我们研究了(i)连续成骨分化(COD)和(ii)成骨分化之前的软骨形成(CD→OD)。将血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的作用与VEGF与成纤维细胞生长因子、白细胞介素(IL)-1、IL-6、血小板源性生长因子和肿瘤坏死因子-α(一种可能具有协同作用的生长因子混合物)的作用进行比较。在这个有限的样本中,我们观察到细胞扩增没有年龄或性别相关的差异。同样,COD和CD→OD球体在成骨和血管生成评分上没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,在COD中,与对照组相比,VEGF显著增加了血管生成(p = 0.007)。在COD中,VEGF和VEGF + GFM均能促进成骨(p = 0.047和p = 0.038)。相比之下,在CD→OD组中,VEGF和VEGF + GFM均未产生统计学意义上的血管生成或成骨评分。为了理解这些结果,我们利用纳米液相色谱-串联质谱技术对球状蛋白的表达进行了表征。与CD→OD相比,9种血管生成蛋白在COD中表达或上调:(i)内皮标志物JUP、PTGIS、PTGS2和TYMP, (ii)组织重塑因子CHI3L1和MMP14,以及(iii)代谢途径调节剂ANGPTL4、ITGA5和WNT5A。ANGPTL4、ITGA5、PTGIS、PTGS2和WNT5A定义了一个保守的血管生成网络,与VEGF + GFM相比,VEGF增加了2倍以上。最后,我们研究了在可打印的聚富马酸丙酯(PPF)支架上进行个体化移植的骨形成。在COD + VEGF条件下,载有包皮来源细胞的PPF支架表现出海绵状骨形成的特征。因此,利用组织打印技术在颅面骨修复中,人的头盖骨可能是一个潜在的骨生成细胞储存库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering Part A
Tissue Engineering Part A CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信