Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland.

IF 1.3 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Record Open Pub Date : 2020-06-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1136/vetreco-2019-000389
Thomas Echtermann, Cedric Müntener, Xaver Sidler, Dolf Kümmerlen
{"title":"Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland.","authors":"Thomas Echtermann, Cedric Müntener, Xaver Sidler, Dolf Kümmerlen","doi":"10.1136/vetreco-2019-000389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015, in Switzerland the Suissano Health Programme was implemented in pig production to improve transparency for antimicrobial usage (AMU) and to reduce the usage of fluoroquinolones (FQ), macrolides and cephalosporins, representing highest priority critically important antimicrobials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the presented cohort study, the impact of the Suissano programme on the AMU of 291 pig farms between 2016 and 2017 was investigated. AMU was calculated in total numbers of defined course doses (nDCDch) for all farms in the programme. For each single farm the nDCDch/animal/year was determined for four different age categories (suckling piglets, weaned piglets, fattening pigs, sows) as well as each antimicrobial substance separately. Trends between 2016 and 2017 were investigated for all farms as well as the 25 per cent with the highest usage of antimicrobials (high users) separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total AMU measured in nDCDch declined by 23 per cent between 2016 and 2017, but statistically significant differences could not be observed when comparing the data sets of the individual farms. A significantly reduced usage of FQ could be demonstrated in suckling piglets (P=0.003), weaned piglets (P=0.006) and sows (P=0.008) in 2017 compared with 2016. For high users, a significant reduction of total AMU could be shown in suckling piglets (P=0.02), weaned piglets (P=0.0004) and fattening pigs (P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the usage of FQs in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and sows as well as total AMU in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and fattening pigs on high-usage farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23565,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/73/vetreco-2019-000389.PMC7326250.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2019-000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2015, in Switzerland the Suissano Health Programme was implemented in pig production to improve transparency for antimicrobial usage (AMU) and to reduce the usage of fluoroquinolones (FQ), macrolides and cephalosporins, representing highest priority critically important antimicrobials.

Methods: In the presented cohort study, the impact of the Suissano programme on the AMU of 291 pig farms between 2016 and 2017 was investigated. AMU was calculated in total numbers of defined course doses (nDCDch) for all farms in the programme. For each single farm the nDCDch/animal/year was determined for four different age categories (suckling piglets, weaned piglets, fattening pigs, sows) as well as each antimicrobial substance separately. Trends between 2016 and 2017 were investigated for all farms as well as the 25 per cent with the highest usage of antimicrobials (high users) separately.

Results: Total AMU measured in nDCDch declined by 23 per cent between 2016 and 2017, but statistically significant differences could not be observed when comparing the data sets of the individual farms. A significantly reduced usage of FQ could be demonstrated in suckling piglets (P=0.003), weaned piglets (P=0.006) and sows (P=0.008) in 2017 compared with 2016. For high users, a significant reduction of total AMU could be shown in suckling piglets (P=0.02), weaned piglets (P=0.0004) and fattening pigs (P=0.01).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the usage of FQs in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and sows as well as total AMU in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and fattening pigs on high-usage farms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Suissano 健康计划对瑞士 291 个养猪场抗菌药使用情况的影响。
背景:2015年,瑞士在养猪生产中实施了Suissano健康计划,以提高抗菌药使用(AMU)的透明度,减少氟喹诺酮类(FQ)、大环内酯类和头孢菌素的使用,这些抗菌药代表了最优先的极其重要的抗菌药:在所提交的队列研究中,调查了 2016 年至 2017 年间 Suissano 计划对 291 个猪场 AMU 的影响。AMU 以该计划中所有猪场的规定疗程剂量总数(nDCDch)计算。对每个猪场的四个不同年龄类别(哺乳仔猪、断奶仔猪、育肥猪、母猪)以及每种抗菌物质分别确定了 nDCDch/动物/年。对所有猪场以及抗菌素使用量最高的 25%猪场(高用量猪场)2016 年至 2017 年的趋势进行了调查:2016 年至 2017 年间,nDCDch 中测得的 AMU 总量下降了 23%,但在比较各个农场的数据集时,无法观察到统计学上的显著差异。与2016年相比,2017年哺乳仔猪(P=0.003)、断奶仔猪(P=0.006)和母猪(P=0.008)的FQ使用量明显减少。对于高用量者,哺乳仔猪(P=0.02)、断奶仔猪(P=0.0004)和育肥猪(P=0.01)的总AMU显著减少:本研究表明,在高使用量猪场中,哺乳仔猪、断奶仔猪和母猪的 FQs 使用量以及哺乳仔猪、断奶仔猪和育肥猪的 AMU 总量均显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Record Open
Veterinary Record Open VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record Open is a journal dedicated to publishing specialist veterinary research across a range of topic areas including those of a more niche and specialist nature to that considered in the weekly Vet Record. Research from all disciplines of veterinary interest will be considered. It is an Open Access journal of the British Veterinary Association.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信