Identifying Effortful Individuals With Mixture Modeling Response Accuracy and Response Time Simultaneously to Improve Item Parameter Estimation.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Educational and Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-01-06 DOI:10.1177/0013164419895068
Yue Liu, Ying Cheng, Hongyun Liu
{"title":"Identifying Effortful Individuals With Mixture Modeling Response Accuracy and Response Time Simultaneously to Improve Item Parameter Estimation.","authors":"Yue Liu,&nbsp;Ying Cheng,&nbsp;Hongyun Liu","doi":"10.1177/0013164419895068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The responses of non-effortful test-takers may have serious consequences as non-effortful responses can impair model calibration and latent trait inferences. This article introduces a mixture model, using both response accuracy and response time information, to help differentiating non-effortful and effortful individuals, and to improve item parameter estimation based on the effortful group. Two mixture approaches are compared with the traditional response time mixture model (TMM) method and the normative threshold 10 (NT10) method with response behavior effort criteria in four simulation scenarios with regard to item parameter recovery and classification accuracy. The results demonstrate that the mixture methods and the TMM method can reduce the bias of item parameter estimates caused by non-effortful individuals, with the mixture methods showing more advantages when the non-effort severity is high or the response times are not lognormally distributed. An illustrative example is also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"80 4","pages":"775-807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0013164419895068","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419895068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The responses of non-effortful test-takers may have serious consequences as non-effortful responses can impair model calibration and latent trait inferences. This article introduces a mixture model, using both response accuracy and response time information, to help differentiating non-effortful and effortful individuals, and to improve item parameter estimation based on the effortful group. Two mixture approaches are compared with the traditional response time mixture model (TMM) method and the normative threshold 10 (NT10) method with response behavior effort criteria in four simulation scenarios with regard to item parameter recovery and classification accuracy. The results demonstrate that the mixture methods and the TMM method can reduce the bias of item parameter estimates caused by non-effortful individuals, with the mixture methods showing more advantages when the non-effort severity is high or the response times are not lognormally distributed. An illustrative example is also provided.

用混合模型同时识别努力个体的反应精度和反应时间,以改进项目参数估计。
不费力的应试者的反应可能会产生严重的后果,因为不费力的反应会损害模型的校准和潜在的特质推断。本文引入了一个混合模型,利用反应准确性和反应时间信息来帮助区分不努力和努力的个体,并改进了基于努力群体的项目参数估计。将两种混合方法与传统的响应时间混合模型(TMM)方法和具有响应行为努力标准的规范阈值10 (NT10)方法在四种模拟场景下的项目参数恢复和分类准确率进行了比较。结果表明,混合方法和TMM方法均能降低不费力个体对项目参数估计的偏差,且在不费力程度较高或反应时间非对数正态分布时,混合方法更具优势。还提供了一个说明性示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信