Testing soil nematode extraction efficiency using different variations of the Baermann-funnel method.

Soil Organisms Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-06 DOI:10.25674/so91201
Simone Cesarz, Annika Eva Schulz, Rémy Beugnon, Nico Eisenhauer
{"title":"Testing soil nematode extraction efficiency using different variations of the Baermann-funnel method.","authors":"Simone Cesarz, Annika Eva Schulz, Rémy Beugnon, Nico Eisenhauer","doi":"10.25674/so91201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nematodes are increasingly used as powerful bioindicators of soil food web composition and functioning in ecological studies. Todays' ecological research aims to investigate not only local relationships but global patterns, which requires consistent methodology across locations. Thus, a common and easy extraction protocol of soil nematodes is needed. In this study, we present a detailed protocol of the Baermann-funnel method and highlight how different soil pre-treatments and equipment (soil type, soil height, sieving, and filter type) can affect extraction efficiency and community composition by using natural nematode communities. We found that highest nematode extraction efficiency was achieved using lowest soil height as indicated by the thickness of the soil sample in the extractor (1, 2, or 4 cm soil height) in combination with soil sieving (instead of no sieving), and by using milk filters (instead of paper towels). PCA at the family level revealed that different pre-treatments significantly affected nematode community composition. Increasing the height of the soil sample by adding more soil increased the proportion of larger-sized nematodes likely because those are able to overcome long distances but selected against small nematodes. Sieving is suggested to break up soil aggregates and, therefore, facilitate moving in general. Interestingly, sieving did not negatively affect larger nematodes that are supposed to have a higher probability of getting bruised during sieving but, even if not significant, tended to yield more extracted nematodes than no sieving. We therefore recommend to use small heights of sieved soil with milk filter to extract free-living soil nematodes with the Baermann-funnel method. The present study shows that variations in the extraction protocol can alter the total density and community composition of extracted nematodes and provides recommendations for an efficient and standardized approach in future studies. Having a simple, cheap, and standardized extraction protocol can facilitate the assessment of soil biodiversity in global contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":53066,"journal":{"name":"Soil Organisms","volume":"91 2","pages":"61-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326606/pdf/EMS86615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Organisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25674/so91201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nematodes are increasingly used as powerful bioindicators of soil food web composition and functioning in ecological studies. Todays' ecological research aims to investigate not only local relationships but global patterns, which requires consistent methodology across locations. Thus, a common and easy extraction protocol of soil nematodes is needed. In this study, we present a detailed protocol of the Baermann-funnel method and highlight how different soil pre-treatments and equipment (soil type, soil height, sieving, and filter type) can affect extraction efficiency and community composition by using natural nematode communities. We found that highest nematode extraction efficiency was achieved using lowest soil height as indicated by the thickness of the soil sample in the extractor (1, 2, or 4 cm soil height) in combination with soil sieving (instead of no sieving), and by using milk filters (instead of paper towels). PCA at the family level revealed that different pre-treatments significantly affected nematode community composition. Increasing the height of the soil sample by adding more soil increased the proportion of larger-sized nematodes likely because those are able to overcome long distances but selected against small nematodes. Sieving is suggested to break up soil aggregates and, therefore, facilitate moving in general. Interestingly, sieving did not negatively affect larger nematodes that are supposed to have a higher probability of getting bruised during sieving but, even if not significant, tended to yield more extracted nematodes than no sieving. We therefore recommend to use small heights of sieved soil with milk filter to extract free-living soil nematodes with the Baermann-funnel method. The present study shows that variations in the extraction protocol can alter the total density and community composition of extracted nematodes and provides recommendations for an efficient and standardized approach in future studies. Having a simple, cheap, and standardized extraction protocol can facilitate the assessment of soil biodiversity in global contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

采用不同的baermann -漏斗法测试土壤线虫提取效率。
在生态学研究中,线虫越来越多地被用作土壤食物网组成和功能的强有力的生物指标。今天的生态研究不仅要调查当地的关系,还要调查全球的模式,这需要在不同的地点采用一致的方法。因此,需要一种通用且简便的土壤线虫提取方案。在这项研究中,我们提出了baermann -漏斗法的详细方案,并强调了不同的土壤预处理和设备(土壤类型、土壤高度、筛分和过滤器类型)如何影响天然线虫群落的提取效率和群落组成。我们发现,在土壤高度最低的情况下(土壤高度为1、2或4厘米),结合土壤筛分(而不是不筛分)和使用牛奶过滤器(而不是纸巾),可以获得最高的线虫提取效率。科水平的主成分分析显示,不同预处理对线虫群落组成有显著影响。通过添加更多的土壤来增加土壤样品的高度,增加了大型线虫的比例,可能是因为它们能够克服长距离,但选择对抗小型线虫。建议筛分,以打破土壤团聚体,因此,有利于移动一般。有趣的是,筛分并没有对较大的线虫产生负面影响,这些线虫在筛分过程中被擦伤的可能性更高,但即使不显著,也往往比不筛分产生更多的被提取的线虫。因此,我们建议采用baermann -漏斗法在小高度的土壤中筛入牛奶过滤器,以提取自由生活的土壤线虫。本研究表明,不同的提取方法可以改变提取的线虫的总密度和群落组成,并为今后的研究提供了有效和标准化的方法。拥有一个简单、廉价和标准化的提取方案可以促进全球土壤生物多样性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信