Ejaculatory abstinence in semen analysis: does it make any sense?

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2020-06-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2633494120906882
Shah Dupesh, Natarajan Pandiyan, Radha Pandiyan, Jeeva Kartheeswaran, Bhaskar Prakash
{"title":"Ejaculatory abstinence in semen analysis: does it make any sense?","authors":"Shah Dupesh, Natarajan Pandiyan, Radha Pandiyan, Jeeva Kartheeswaran, Bhaskar Prakash","doi":"10.1177/2633494120906882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precise effect of ejaculatory abstinence on semen parameters is highly debatable, especially among subfertile men. Previous studies on effect of abstinence time on different semen parameters have reported controversial results. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the variance of semen parameters with different periods of ejaculatory abstinence among both a population of normozoospermic (<i>n</i> = 1621) and oligozoospermic (<i>n</i> = 416) Tamil men, presenting to a fertility clinic for an infertility evaluation (<i>N</i> = 2037).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 2037 semen analysis reports involved grouping patients based on their ejaculatory abstinence, that is, <24 h, 1 to 2 days, 3 to 7 days, 8 to 15 days, 16 to 30 days, and >30 days. All semen parameters were assessed as per the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010) recommended guidelines. The unpaired two-tailed <i>t</i>-test and Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with Games-Howell post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. A <i>p</i> value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data (<i>N</i> = 2037) identified no statistically significant differences in semen parameters of sperm concentration, percentage of progressively motile sperm, and normal sperm morphology in both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic individuals across different groups of abstinence. Semen volume was the only parameter that showed a statistically significant difference in both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). In both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men, the group with <24 h abstinence had the highest mean percentage of progressively motile sperm and normal sperm morphology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that ejaculatory abstinence may be highly arbitrary, and the recommendation of a strict 2- to 7-day abstinence per the WHO may be liberalized. In both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men, semen parameters associated with an abstinence of <24 h were found to be noninferior as compared to longer ejaculatory abstinence intervals. These findings support in eliminating conservative recommendations as far as abstinence is concerned and suggest that patients may be asked to collect a semen sample on the day they present for an infertility evaluation, regardless of abstinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/e8/10.1177_2633494120906882.PMC7297125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120906882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The precise effect of ejaculatory abstinence on semen parameters is highly debatable, especially among subfertile men. Previous studies on effect of abstinence time on different semen parameters have reported controversial results. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the variance of semen parameters with different periods of ejaculatory abstinence among both a population of normozoospermic (n = 1621) and oligozoospermic (n = 416) Tamil men, presenting to a fertility clinic for an infertility evaluation (N = 2037).

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 2037 semen analysis reports involved grouping patients based on their ejaculatory abstinence, that is, <24 h, 1 to 2 days, 3 to 7 days, 8 to 15 days, 16 to 30 days, and >30 days. All semen parameters were assessed as per the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010) recommended guidelines. The unpaired two-tailed t-test and Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with Games-Howell post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Result: A retrospective analysis of data (N = 2037) identified no statistically significant differences in semen parameters of sperm concentration, percentage of progressively motile sperm, and normal sperm morphology in both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic individuals across different groups of abstinence. Semen volume was the only parameter that showed a statistically significant difference in both groups (p < 0.0001). In both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men, the group with <24 h abstinence had the highest mean percentage of progressively motile sperm and normal sperm morphology.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that ejaculatory abstinence may be highly arbitrary, and the recommendation of a strict 2- to 7-day abstinence per the WHO may be liberalized. In both normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men, semen parameters associated with an abstinence of <24 h were found to be noninferior as compared to longer ejaculatory abstinence intervals. These findings support in eliminating conservative recommendations as far as abstinence is concerned and suggest that patients may be asked to collect a semen sample on the day they present for an infertility evaluation, regardless of abstinence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

精液分析中的禁欲:有意义吗?
背景:禁欲对精液参数的确切影响还存在很大争议,尤其是在未育男性中。以往关于禁欲时间对不同精液参数影响的研究报告结果存在争议。本研究的目的是回顾性评估不同禁欲期精液参数的差异,研究对象包括正常无精症(n = 1621)和少精症(n = 416)的泰米尔男性,他们都曾到不孕不育诊所接受不孕不育评估(N = 2037):对 2037 份精液分析报告进行回顾性分析,根据患者的禁欲时间(即 30 天)进行分组。所有精液参数均按照世界卫生组织(WHO,2010 年)推荐的指南进行评估。统计分析采用非配对双尾 t 检验和韦尔奇方差分析 (ANOVA) 结合 Games-Howell 事后检验。p 值 结果:对数据(N = 2037)进行回顾性分析后发现,在不同禁欲组别中,正常精子症和少精子症患者的精液参数(精子浓度、活动精子百分比和正常精子形态)在统计学上没有显著差异。精液量是唯一一个在两组中均显示出显著统计学差异的参数(P 结论:精液量是影响精子质量的一个重要因素:本研究的结果表明,射精禁欲可能具有很大的随意性,世卫组织提出的严格禁欲 2 至 7 天的建议可以放宽。在正常无精症和少精症男性中,精液参数与禁欲时间为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信