Examining the Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance of the Social Support for Exercise Scale among Spanish- and English- language Hispanics.
Timothy J Walker, Natalia I Heredia, Belinda M Reininger
{"title":"Examining the Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance of the Social Support for Exercise Scale among Spanish- and English- language Hispanics.","authors":"Timothy J Walker, Natalia I Heredia, Belinda M Reininger","doi":"10.1177/0739986319854144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Social Support for Exercise Subscales are commonly used among Hispanic populations. The aims of this study were to test the validity and reliability of the Spanish-language version of the Social Support for Exercise Subscales, and test the invariance of the Spanish- and English-language versions. Data were from a subsample of Hispanic adults in the Cameron County Hispanic Cohort (n=1,447). A series of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were used to assess the validity and reliability of the Spanish-language version of the subscales. A multi group CFA approach was used to test measurement invariance. Results indicated the Spanish-language versions of family and friend support subscales had good validity and reliability (RMSEA<.07, CFI>0.95, TLI>0.94, and SRMR<0.05). There was also evidence of measurement invariance between the Spanish- and English-language versions. These findings indicate the Spanish-language family and friend support subscales are valid and can be compared between Spanish- and English-language Hispanic respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":13072,"journal":{"name":"Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences","volume":"41 3","pages":"427-443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291866/pdf/nihms-1037388.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986319854144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Social Support for Exercise Subscales are commonly used among Hispanic populations. The aims of this study were to test the validity and reliability of the Spanish-language version of the Social Support for Exercise Subscales, and test the invariance of the Spanish- and English-language versions. Data were from a subsample of Hispanic adults in the Cameron County Hispanic Cohort (n=1,447). A series of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were used to assess the validity and reliability of the Spanish-language version of the subscales. A multi group CFA approach was used to test measurement invariance. Results indicated the Spanish-language versions of family and friend support subscales had good validity and reliability (RMSEA<.07, CFI>0.95, TLI>0.94, and SRMR<0.05). There was also evidence of measurement invariance between the Spanish- and English-language versions. These findings indicate the Spanish-language family and friend support subscales are valid and can be compared between Spanish- and English-language Hispanic respondents.
运动社会支持分量表常用于西班牙裔人群。本研究的目的是测试西班牙语版本的运动社会支持分量表的有效性和可靠性,并测试西班牙语和英语版本的不变性。数据来自卡梅伦县西班牙裔队列(Cameron County Hispanic Cohort)中的西班牙裔成人子样本(n=1,447)。我们使用了一系列确证因子分析(CFA)模型来评估西班牙语版本分量表的有效性和可靠性。采用多组 CFA 方法测试测量不变性。结果表明,西班牙语版本的家庭和朋友支持分量表具有良好的效度和信度(RMSEA0.95、TLI>0.94 和 SRMR
期刊介绍:
The Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences publishes empirical articles, multiple case study reports, critical reviews of literature, conceptual articles, reports of new instruments, and scholarly notes of theoretical or methodological interest to Hispanic populations. The multidisciplinary focus of the HJBS includes the fields of anthropology, economics, education, linguistics, political science, psychology, psychiatry, public health, and sociology.