Would You Prescribe Mobile Health Apps for Heart Failure Self-care? An Integrated Review of Commercially Available Mobile Technology for Heart Failure Patients.

IF 4.2 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiac Failure Review Pub Date : 2020-05-25 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01 DOI:10.15420/cfr.2019.11
Andrea Mortara, Lucia Vaira, Vittorio Palmieri, Massimo Iacoviello, Ilaria Battistoni, Attilio Iacovoni, Francesca Macera, Daniele Pasqualucci, Mario Bochicchio, Renata De Maria
{"title":"Would You Prescribe Mobile Health Apps for Heart Failure Self-care? An Integrated Review of Commercially Available Mobile Technology for Heart Failure Patients.","authors":"Andrea Mortara,&nbsp;Lucia Vaira,&nbsp;Vittorio Palmieri,&nbsp;Massimo Iacoviello,&nbsp;Ilaria Battistoni,&nbsp;Attilio Iacovoni,&nbsp;Francesca Macera,&nbsp;Daniele Pasqualucci,&nbsp;Mario Bochicchio,&nbsp;Renata De Maria","doi":"10.15420/cfr.2019.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of chronic diseases, such as heart failure, requires complex protocols based on early diagnosis; self-monitoring of symptoms, vital signs and physical activity; regular medication intake; and education of patients and caregivers about relevant aspects of the disease. Smartphones and mobile health applications could be very helpful in improving the efficacy of such protocols, but several barriers make it difficult to fully exploit their technological potential and produce clear clinical evidence of their effectiveness. App suppliers do not help users distinguish between useless/dangerous apps and valid solutions. The latter are few and often characterised by rapid obsolescence, lack of interactivity and lack of authoritative information. Systematic reviews can help physicians and researchers find and assess the 'best candidate solutions' in a repeatable manner and pave the way for well-grounded and fruitful discussion on their clinical effectiveness. To this purpose, the authors assess 10 apps for heart failure self-care using the Intercontinental Marketing Statistics score and other criteria, discuss the clinical effectiveness of existing solutions and identify barriers to their use in practice and drivers for change.</p>","PeriodicalId":33741,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Failure Review","volume":"6 ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/75/cfr-06-e13.PMC7277786.pdf","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Failure Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2019.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Treatment of chronic diseases, such as heart failure, requires complex protocols based on early diagnosis; self-monitoring of symptoms, vital signs and physical activity; regular medication intake; and education of patients and caregivers about relevant aspects of the disease. Smartphones and mobile health applications could be very helpful in improving the efficacy of such protocols, but several barriers make it difficult to fully exploit their technological potential and produce clear clinical evidence of their effectiveness. App suppliers do not help users distinguish between useless/dangerous apps and valid solutions. The latter are few and often characterised by rapid obsolescence, lack of interactivity and lack of authoritative information. Systematic reviews can help physicians and researchers find and assess the 'best candidate solutions' in a repeatable manner and pave the way for well-grounded and fruitful discussion on their clinical effectiveness. To this purpose, the authors assess 10 apps for heart failure self-care using the Intercontinental Marketing Statistics score and other criteria, discuss the clinical effectiveness of existing solutions and identify barriers to their use in practice and drivers for change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

你会为心力衰竭的自我护理开移动健康应用程序吗?对心力衰竭患者商用移动技术的综合评价。
治疗慢性疾病,如心力衰竭,需要基于早期诊断的复杂方案;自我监测症状、生命体征和身体活动;定期服药;对患者和护理人员进行疾病相关方面的教育。智能手机和移动保健应用程序可能非常有助于提高此类方案的效力,但一些障碍使其难以充分利用其技术潜力并产生其有效性的明确临床证据。应用供应商不会帮助用户区分无用/危险的应用和有效的解决方案。后者很少,而且往往以迅速过时、缺乏互动性和缺乏权威信息为特点。系统评价可以帮助医生和研究人员以可重复的方式找到和评估“最佳候选解决方案”,并为对其临床有效性进行有充分根据和富有成效的讨论铺平道路。为此,作者使用洲际市场统计评分和其他标准评估了10个心力衰竭自我护理应用程序,讨论了现有解决方案的临床有效性,并确定了在实践中使用它们的障碍和变革的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信