Enhancing the quality of supervision: description and initial outcomes of a blended-learning approach to RANZCP supervisor accreditation.

Stephen Parker, Nicola Warren, Sarah Hamilton, Sidney Cabral, Jimsie Cutbush
{"title":"Enhancing the quality of supervision: description and initial outcomes of a blended-learning approach to RANZCP supervisor accreditation.","authors":"Stephen Parker,&nbsp;Nicola Warren,&nbsp;Sarah Hamilton,&nbsp;Sidney Cabral,&nbsp;Jimsie Cutbush","doi":"10.1177/1039856220928875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation of a blended learning adaptation of the accreditation process for supervisors in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' (RANZCP) Competency-Based Fellowship Program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The adaption of the accreditation process is described, and a mixed-methods approach was taken in its evaluation. Descriptive statistics are presented for participant responses to and engagement with interactive workshop elements. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied to examine the change in participants' confidence in their understanding of the expectations of a supervisor at the commencement and conclusion of the workshop. Free text evaluative responses were subject to qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants expressed a preference for the blended learning workshop format and indicated that live polling improved the learning experience. Additionally, participants expressed greater confidence in their understanding of the expectations of the supervisor role following workshop completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The blended learning approach to supervisor training was preferred by participants and may provide a model to be adopted by other training committees and institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":347122,"journal":{"name":"Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists","volume":" ","pages":"398-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1039856220928875","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856220928875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of a blended learning adaptation of the accreditation process for supervisors in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' (RANZCP) Competency-Based Fellowship Program.

Method: The adaption of the accreditation process is described, and a mixed-methods approach was taken in its evaluation. Descriptive statistics are presented for participant responses to and engagement with interactive workshop elements. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied to examine the change in participants' confidence in their understanding of the expectations of a supervisor at the commencement and conclusion of the workshop. Free text evaluative responses were subject to qualitative content analysis.

Results: Most participants expressed a preference for the blended learning workshop format and indicated that live polling improved the learning experience. Additionally, participants expressed greater confidence in their understanding of the expectations of the supervisor role following workshop completion.

Conclusions: The blended learning approach to supervisor training was preferred by participants and may provide a model to be adopted by other training committees and institutions.

提高监督质量:RANZCP监督员认证的混合学习方法的描述和初步结果。
目的:评估澳大利亚和新西兰皇家精神科医学院(RANZCP)基于能力的奖学金项目中主管资格认证过程的混合学习适应。方法:对认证过程的适应进行了描述,并在其评估中采用了混合方法。描述的统计数据提供了参与者的反应和参与互动讲习班的元素。采用Wilcoxon签名等级检验来检验参与者在讲习班开始和结束时对主管期望的理解信心的变化。对自由文本的评价性反应进行定性内容分析。结果:大多数参与者表达了对混合学习研讨会形式的偏好,并表明现场投票改善了学习体验。此外,参与者对研讨班结束后对主管角色的期望表达了更大的信心。结论:学员倾向于采用混合式学习方法进行督导培训,并可为其他培训委员会和机构提供借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信