Sex differences in associations of socioemotional dispositions measured in childhood and adolescence with brain white matter microstructure 12 years later.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2020-05-13 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2020.3
Benjamin B Lahey, Kendra E Hinton, Francisco Calvache Meyer, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Carol A Van Hulle, Brooks Applegate, Xiaochan Yang, David H Zald
{"title":"Sex differences in associations of socioemotional dispositions measured in childhood and adolescence with brain white matter microstructure 12 years later.","authors":"Benjamin B Lahey, Kendra E Hinton, Francisco Calvache Meyer, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Carol A Van Hulle, Brooks Applegate, Xiaochan Yang, David H Zald","doi":"10.1017/pen.2020.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictive associations were estimated between socioemotional dispositions measured at 10-17 years using the Child and Adolescent Dispositions Scale (CADS) and future individual differences in white matter microstructure measured at 22-31 years of age. Participants were 410 twins (48.3% monozygotic) selected for later neuroimaging by oversampling on risk for psychopathology from a representative sample of child and adolescent twins. Controlling for demographic covariates and total intracranial volume (TICV), each CADS disposition (negative emotionality, prosociality, and daring) rated by one of the informants (parent or youth) significantly predicted global fractional anisotropy (FA) averaged across the major white matter tracts in brain in adulthood, but did so through significant interactions with sex after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. In females, each 1 SD difference in greater parent-rated prosociality was associated with 0.43 SD greater FA (<i>p</i> < 0.0008). In males, each 1 SD difference in greater parent-rated daring was associated with 0.24 SD lower FA (<i>p</i> < 0.0008), and each 1 SD difference in greater youth-rated negative emotionality was associated with 0.18 SD greater average FA (<i>p</i> < 0.0040). These findings suggest that CADS dispositions are associated with FA, but associations differ by sex. Exploratory analyses suggest that FA may mediate the associations between dispositions and psychopathology in some cases. These associations over 12 years could reflect enduring brain-behavior associations in spite of transactions with the environment, but could equally reflect processes in which dispositional differences in behavior influence the development of white matter. Future longitudinal studies are needed to resolve the causal nature of these sex-moderated associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2020.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive associations were estimated between socioemotional dispositions measured at 10-17 years using the Child and Adolescent Dispositions Scale (CADS) and future individual differences in white matter microstructure measured at 22-31 years of age. Participants were 410 twins (48.3% monozygotic) selected for later neuroimaging by oversampling on risk for psychopathology from a representative sample of child and adolescent twins. Controlling for demographic covariates and total intracranial volume (TICV), each CADS disposition (negative emotionality, prosociality, and daring) rated by one of the informants (parent or youth) significantly predicted global fractional anisotropy (FA) averaged across the major white matter tracts in brain in adulthood, but did so through significant interactions with sex after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. In females, each 1 SD difference in greater parent-rated prosociality was associated with 0.43 SD greater FA (p < 0.0008). In males, each 1 SD difference in greater parent-rated daring was associated with 0.24 SD lower FA (p < 0.0008), and each 1 SD difference in greater youth-rated negative emotionality was associated with 0.18 SD greater average FA (p < 0.0040). These findings suggest that CADS dispositions are associated with FA, but associations differ by sex. Exploratory analyses suggest that FA may mediate the associations between dispositions and psychopathology in some cases. These associations over 12 years could reflect enduring brain-behavior associations in spite of transactions with the environment, but could equally reflect processes in which dispositional differences in behavior influence the development of white matter. Future longitudinal studies are needed to resolve the causal nature of these sex-moderated associations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

童年和青少年时期测量的社会情感倾向与 12 年后大脑白质微结构之间的性别差异。
通过使用儿童和青少年倾向量表(CADS)对 10-17 岁时的社会情感倾向进行测量,并对 22-31 岁时白质微结构的未来个体差异进行了预测。研究人员从一个具有代表性的儿童和青少年双胞胎样本中,通过对精神病理学风险进行超量抽样,挑选了410对双胞胎(48.3%为单卵双生)进行后期神经成像研究。在控制人口统计学协变量和颅内总容积(TICV)的情况下,由其中一位信息提供者(父母或青少年)评定的每种CADS倾向(消极情绪、亲社会性和大胆)都能显著预测成年后大脑主要白质束平均的全局分数各向异性(FA),但在经过错误发现率(FDR)校正后,这种预测是通过与性别的显著交互作用实现的。在女性中,父母评价的亲社会性每增加 1 SD,FA 就增加 0.43 SD(p < 0.0008)。在男性中,父母评价的大胆程度每增加 1 个标准差,FA 值就降低 0.24 个标准差(p < 0.0008);青少年评价的消极情绪程度每增加 1 个标准差,平均 FA 值就增加 0.18 个标准差(p < 0.0040)。这些研究结果表明,CADS处置与FA相关,但不同性别的相关性不同。探索性分析表明,在某些情况下,FA 可能会介导倾向与精神病理学之间的关联。这些历时 12 年的关联可能反映了大脑与行为之间的持久关联,尽管这种关联是与环境相关的,但也可能同样反映了行为的倾向性差异影响白质发育的过程。今后还需要进行纵向研究,以确定这些性别调节关联的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信