On Curiosity: A Fundamental Aspect of Personality, a Practice of Network Growth.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2018-08-10 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2018.3
Perry Zurn, Danielle S Bassett
{"title":"On Curiosity: A Fundamental Aspect of Personality, a Practice of Network Growth.","authors":"Perry Zurn,&nbsp;Danielle S Bassett","doi":"10.1017/pen.2018.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human personality is reflected in patterns-or <i>networks</i>-of behavior, either in thought or action. Curiosity is an oft-treasured component of one's personality, commonly associated with information-seeking proclivities with distinct neurophysiological correlates. The markers of curiosity can differ substantially across people, suggesting the possibility that personality also determines the architectural style of one's curiosity. Yet progress in defining those styles, and marking their neurophysiological basis, has been hampered by fairly fundamental difficulties in defining curiosity itself. Here, we offer and exercise a definition of the practice of curiosity as knowledge network building, one particular pattern of thought behavior. To unpack this definition and motivate its utility, we begin with a short primer on network science and describe how the mathematical object of a network can be used to map items and relations that are characteristic of bodies of knowledge. Next, we turn to a discussion of how networks grow, how their growth can be modeled, and how the practice of curiosity can be formalized as a process of network growth. We pay particular attention to how individuals may differ in how they build their knowledge networks, and discuss how the sort, manner, and action of building can be modulated by experience. We discuss how this definition of the practice of curiosity motivates new experiments and theory development at the interdisciplinary intersection of network science, personality neuroscience, education, and curiosity studies. We close with a note on the potential of network science to inform studies of other domains of personality, and the patterns of thought- or action-behavior characteristic thereof.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2018.3","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Human personality is reflected in patterns-or networks-of behavior, either in thought or action. Curiosity is an oft-treasured component of one's personality, commonly associated with information-seeking proclivities with distinct neurophysiological correlates. The markers of curiosity can differ substantially across people, suggesting the possibility that personality also determines the architectural style of one's curiosity. Yet progress in defining those styles, and marking their neurophysiological basis, has been hampered by fairly fundamental difficulties in defining curiosity itself. Here, we offer and exercise a definition of the practice of curiosity as knowledge network building, one particular pattern of thought behavior. To unpack this definition and motivate its utility, we begin with a short primer on network science and describe how the mathematical object of a network can be used to map items and relations that are characteristic of bodies of knowledge. Next, we turn to a discussion of how networks grow, how their growth can be modeled, and how the practice of curiosity can be formalized as a process of network growth. We pay particular attention to how individuals may differ in how they build their knowledge networks, and discuss how the sort, manner, and action of building can be modulated by experience. We discuss how this definition of the practice of curiosity motivates new experiments and theory development at the interdisciplinary intersection of network science, personality neuroscience, education, and curiosity studies. We close with a note on the potential of network science to inform studies of other domains of personality, and the patterns of thought- or action-behavior characteristic thereof.

好奇心:人格的基本方面,网络成长的实践。
人的个性反映在思想或行动的行为模式或网络中。好奇心是一个人性格中经常被珍视的组成部分,通常与具有独特神经生理学相关性的信息寻求倾向有关。好奇心的标志在人与人之间可能有很大的不同,这表明个性也可能决定一个人的好奇心的建筑风格。然而,在定义这些风格和标记它们的神经生理学基础方面的进展,一直受到定义好奇心本身的相当基本困难的阻碍。在这里,我们将好奇心的实践定义为知识网络的构建,一种特殊的思维行为模式。为了解开这个定义并激发它的效用,我们从一个简短的网络科学入门开始,描述如何使用网络的数学对象来映射作为知识体系特征的项目和关系。接下来,我们将讨论网络是如何成长的,它们的成长如何被建模,以及好奇心的实践如何被形式化为网络成长的过程。我们特别关注个人在如何构建知识网络方面的差异,并讨论如何通过经验调节构建的类型、方式和行动。我们将讨论好奇心实践的这一定义如何在网络科学、人格神经科学、教育和好奇心研究的交叉领域激发新的实验和理论发展。最后,我们对网络科学的潜力做了一个说明,它可以为其他人格领域的研究提供信息,以及它们的思维模式或行为特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信