Cognitive emotion regulation and personality: an analysis of individual differences in the neural and behavioral correlates of successful reappraisal.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-11-07 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.11
Christoph Scheffel, Kersten Diers, Sabine Schönfeld, Burkhard Brocke, Alexander Strobel, Denise Dörfel
{"title":"Cognitive emotion regulation and personality: an analysis of individual differences in the neural and behavioral correlates of successful reappraisal.","authors":"Christoph Scheffel, Kersten Diers, Sabine Schönfeld, Burkhard Brocke, Alexander Strobel, Denise Dörfel","doi":"10.1017/pen.2019.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A common and mostly effective emotion regulation strategy is reappraisal. During reappraisal, activity in cognitive control brain regions increases and activity in brain regions associated with emotion responding (e.g., the amygdala) diminishes. Immediately after reappraisal, it has been observed that activity in the amygdala increases again, which might reflect a paradoxical aftereffect. While there is extensive empirical evidence for these neural correlates of emotion regulation, only few studies targeted the association with individual differences in personality traits. The aim of this study is to investigate these associations more thoroughly. Seventy-six healthy participants completed measures of broad personality traits (Big Five, Positive and Negative Affect) as well as of more narrow traits (habitual use of emotion regulation) and performed an experimental fMRI reappraisal task. Participants were instructed to either permit their emotions or to detach themselves from the presented negative and neutral pictures. After each picture, a relaxation period was included. Reappraisal success was determined by arousal ratings and activity in the amygdala. During reappraisal, we found activation in the prefrontal cortex and deactivation in the left amygdala. During the relaxation period, an immediate aftereffect was found in occipital regions and marginally in the amygdala. Neither personality traits nor habitual use of emotion regulation predicted reappraisal success or the magnitude of the aftereffect. We replicated typical activation and deactivation patterns during intentional emotion regulation and partially replicated the immediate aftereffect in the amygdala. However, there was no association between personality traits and emotion regulation success.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common and mostly effective emotion regulation strategy is reappraisal. During reappraisal, activity in cognitive control brain regions increases and activity in brain regions associated with emotion responding (e.g., the amygdala) diminishes. Immediately after reappraisal, it has been observed that activity in the amygdala increases again, which might reflect a paradoxical aftereffect. While there is extensive empirical evidence for these neural correlates of emotion regulation, only few studies targeted the association with individual differences in personality traits. The aim of this study is to investigate these associations more thoroughly. Seventy-six healthy participants completed measures of broad personality traits (Big Five, Positive and Negative Affect) as well as of more narrow traits (habitual use of emotion regulation) and performed an experimental fMRI reappraisal task. Participants were instructed to either permit their emotions or to detach themselves from the presented negative and neutral pictures. After each picture, a relaxation period was included. Reappraisal success was determined by arousal ratings and activity in the amygdala. During reappraisal, we found activation in the prefrontal cortex and deactivation in the left amygdala. During the relaxation period, an immediate aftereffect was found in occipital regions and marginally in the amygdala. Neither personality traits nor habitual use of emotion regulation predicted reappraisal success or the magnitude of the aftereffect. We replicated typical activation and deactivation patterns during intentional emotion regulation and partially replicated the immediate aftereffect in the amygdala. However, there was no association between personality traits and emotion regulation success.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

认知情绪调节与人格:成功再评价的神经和行为相关性个体差异分析》(Cognitive emotion regulation and personality: an analysis of individual differences in the neural and behavioral correlates of successful reappraisal)。
一种常见且大多有效的情绪调节策略是重新评价。在重新评价过程中,认知控制脑区的活动会增加,而与情绪反应相关的脑区(如杏仁核)的活动会减少。据观察,在重新评价之后,杏仁核的活动又会立即增加,这可能反映了一种矛盾的后效应。虽然这些情绪调节的神经相关性已有大量实证证据,但针对其与个性特征个体差异的关联性的研究却寥寥无几。本研究旨在更深入地探讨这些关联。76 名健康的参与者完成了广义人格特质(大五、积极和消极情绪)以及狭义人格特质(习惯性使用情绪调节)的测量,并进行了一项实验性的 fMRI 重新评估任务。参与者被要求允许自己的情绪或从呈现的负面和中性图片中抽离出来。每张图片之后都有一段放松时间。重评成功与否取决于唤醒等级和杏仁核的活动。在重评过程中,我们发现前额叶皮层激活,左侧杏仁核失活。在放松期,我们发现枕叶区和杏仁核有轻微的即时后效应。人格特质和情绪调节的习惯性使用都不能预测再评价的成功或后遗效应的大小。我们复制了有意情绪调节过程中典型的激活和失活模式,并部分复制了杏仁核中的即时后遗效应。然而,人格特质与情绪调节成功与否之间并无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信