Born this way? A review of neurobiological and environmental evidence for the etiology of psychopathy.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-10-23 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.7
Annabelle Frazier, Patricia A Ferreira, Joseph E Gonzales
{"title":"Born this way? A review of neurobiological and environmental evidence for the etiology of psychopathy.","authors":"Annabelle Frazier,&nbsp;Patricia A Ferreira,&nbsp;Joseph E Gonzales","doi":"10.1017/pen.2019.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across a significant body of research, psychopathy has often been conceptualized as a biologically based malady. In this research, genetic and neurobiological differences have been conceptualized to underlie psychopathy, while affected individuals' life experiences only influence expressed psychopathic features and their severity. Psychopathy research has largely ignored developmental evidence demonstrating significant influences of environment on both biological and behavioral processes, resulting in several prominent criticisms (Edens & Vincent, 2008; Loeber, Byrd, & Farrington, 2015). The current review was conducted with two main aims: (a) to collect and consider etiological evidence from the extant body of research on genetic and neurobiological factors in psychopathy; and (b) to evaluate findings from genetic, neurotransmitter, brain structure, and brain function studies in the context of relevant evidence from developmental research. Examples from research on adversity and traumatic stress, a common correlate of psychopathy, were used to highlight current research gaps and future directions to aid in the integration of developmental and neurobiological research agendas. While some promising evidence exists regarding possible underlying neurobiological processes of psychopathic traits, this evidence is insufficient to suggest a largely biological etiology for the disorder. Further, information from developmental and epigenetic research may suggest complex, multidimensional trajectories for individuals experiencing psychopathy. Based on these observations, the authors make several recommendations for future research, as well as for current clinical application and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.7","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Across a significant body of research, psychopathy has often been conceptualized as a biologically based malady. In this research, genetic and neurobiological differences have been conceptualized to underlie psychopathy, while affected individuals' life experiences only influence expressed psychopathic features and their severity. Psychopathy research has largely ignored developmental evidence demonstrating significant influences of environment on both biological and behavioral processes, resulting in several prominent criticisms (Edens & Vincent, 2008; Loeber, Byrd, & Farrington, 2015). The current review was conducted with two main aims: (a) to collect and consider etiological evidence from the extant body of research on genetic and neurobiological factors in psychopathy; and (b) to evaluate findings from genetic, neurotransmitter, brain structure, and brain function studies in the context of relevant evidence from developmental research. Examples from research on adversity and traumatic stress, a common correlate of psychopathy, were used to highlight current research gaps and future directions to aid in the integration of developmental and neurobiological research agendas. While some promising evidence exists regarding possible underlying neurobiological processes of psychopathic traits, this evidence is insufficient to suggest a largely biological etiology for the disorder. Further, information from developmental and epigenetic research may suggest complex, multidimensional trajectories for individuals experiencing psychopathy. Based on these observations, the authors make several recommendations for future research, as well as for current clinical application and practice.

Abstract Image

天生如此?精神病病因的神经生物学和环境证据综述。
在大量的研究中,精神病通常被定义为一种基于生物学的疾病。在这项研究中,遗传和神经生物学的差异被概念化为精神病的基础,而受影响个体的生活经历只影响表达的精神病特征及其严重程度。精神病研究在很大程度上忽视了证明环境对生物和行为过程有重大影响的发展证据,导致了一些突出的批评(Edens & Vincent, 2008;Loeber, Byrd, & Farrington, 2015)。目前的审查有两个主要目的:(a)从现有的关于精神病遗传和神经生物学因素的研究中收集和考虑病因学证据;(b)在发育研究相关证据的背景下,评估遗传、神经递质、脑结构和脑功能研究的发现。从逆境和创伤压力研究的例子,一个常见的精神病相关,被用来强调当前的研究差距和未来的方向,以帮助发展和神经生物学研究议程的整合。虽然存在一些有希望的证据表明可能存在潜在的精神病态特征的神经生物学过程,但这些证据不足以表明该疾病的主要生物学病因。此外,来自发育和表观遗传学研究的信息可能表明,患有精神病的个体有复杂的、多维的轨迹。基于这些观察结果,作者对未来的研究以及当前的临床应用和实践提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信