Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-07-31 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.2
Adam M Perkins, Rebecca Strawbridge, Danilo Arnone, Steven C R Williams, David Gasston, Anthony J Cleare, Owen O'Daly, Veena Kumari, Ulrich Ettinger, Philip J Corr
{"title":"Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict.","authors":"Adam M Perkins,&nbsp;Rebecca Strawbridge,&nbsp;Danilo Arnone,&nbsp;Steven C R Williams,&nbsp;David Gasston,&nbsp;Anthony J Cleare,&nbsp;Owen O'Daly,&nbsp;Veena Kumari,&nbsp;Ulrich Ettinger,&nbsp;Philip J Corr","doi":"10.1017/pen.2019.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As demonstrated by neuroimaging data, the human brain contains systems that control responses to threat. The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality predicts that individual differences in the reactivity of these brain systems produce anxiety and fear-related personality traits. Here we discuss some of the challenges in testing this theory and, as an example, present a pilot study that aimed to dissociate brain activity during pursuit by threat and goal conflict. We did this by translating the Mouse Defense Test Battery for human fMRI use. In this version, dubbed the Joystick Operated Runway Task (JORT), we repeatedly exposed 24 participants to pursuit and goal conflict, with and without threat of electric shock. The runway design of JORT allowed the effect of threat distance on brain activation to be evaluated independently of context. Goal conflict plus threat of electric shock caused deactivation in a network of brain areas that included the fusiform and middle temporal gyri, as well as the default mode network core, including medial frontal regions, precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus, and laterally the inferior parietal and angular gyri. Consistent with earlier research, we also found that imminent threat activated the midbrain and that this effect was significantly stronger during the simple pursuit condition than during goal conflict. Also consistent with earlier research, we found significantly greater hippocampal activation during goal conflict than pursuit by imminent threat. In conclusion, our results contribute knowledge to theories linking anxiety disorders to altered functioning in defensive brain systems and also highlight challenges in this research domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

As demonstrated by neuroimaging data, the human brain contains systems that control responses to threat. The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality predicts that individual differences in the reactivity of these brain systems produce anxiety and fear-related personality traits. Here we discuss some of the challenges in testing this theory and, as an example, present a pilot study that aimed to dissociate brain activity during pursuit by threat and goal conflict. We did this by translating the Mouse Defense Test Battery for human fMRI use. In this version, dubbed the Joystick Operated Runway Task (JORT), we repeatedly exposed 24 participants to pursuit and goal conflict, with and without threat of electric shock. The runway design of JORT allowed the effect of threat distance on brain activation to be evaluated independently of context. Goal conflict plus threat of electric shock caused deactivation in a network of brain areas that included the fusiform and middle temporal gyri, as well as the default mode network core, including medial frontal regions, precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus, and laterally the inferior parietal and angular gyri. Consistent with earlier research, we also found that imminent threat activated the midbrain and that this effect was significantly stronger during the simple pursuit condition than during goal conflict. Also consistent with earlier research, we found significantly greater hippocampal activation during goal conflict than pursuit by imminent threat. In conclusion, our results contribute knowledge to theories linking anxiety disorders to altered functioning in defensive brain systems and also highlight challenges in this research domain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

走向以神经科学为基础的人格理论:追求与目标冲突过程中人脑活动的主体内分离。
正如神经成像数据所显示的那样,人类大脑包含控制对威胁反应的系统。修正后的人格强化敏感性理论预测,这些大脑系统反应的个体差异会产生与焦虑和恐惧相关的人格特征。在这里,我们讨论了测试这一理论的一些挑战,并作为一个例子,提出了一项旨在分离在威胁和目标冲突中追求的大脑活动的初步研究。我们通过将小鼠防御测试电池转换为人类功能磁共振成像来做到这一点。在这个版本中,被称为操纵杆操作跑道任务(JORT),我们反复暴露24名参与者的追求和目标冲突,有和没有电击的威胁。JORT的跑道设计允许独立于情境评估威胁距离对大脑激活的影响。目标冲突加上电击的威胁导致包括梭状回和颞中回在内的大脑区域网络失活,以及默认模式网络核心,包括内侧额叶区、楔前叶和后扣带回,以及外侧的顶叶下回和角回。与之前的研究一致,我们还发现迫在眉睫的威胁激活了中脑,并且这种效应在简单的追求条件下比在目标冲突条件下明显更强。与之前的研究一致的是,我们发现,在目标冲突时,海马体的激活程度明显高于在面临迫在眉睫的威胁时的激活程度。总之,我们的研究结果为将焦虑障碍与防御脑系统功能改变联系起来的理论提供了知识,也突出了这一研究领域的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信