Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-21 DOI:10.1080/14015439.2020.1767202

Elham Moamen Hassan, Aisha Fawzy Abdel Hady, Sahar Saad Shohdi, Hossam Mohammed Eldessouky, Mohammed Hussein Badrel Din

{"title":"Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.","authors":"Elham Moamen Hassan, Aisha Fawzy Abdel Hady, Sahar Saad Shohdi, Hossam Mohammed Eldessouky, Mohammed Hussein Badrel Din","doi":"10.1080/14015439.2020.1767202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the extent to which smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) can replace or complement the conventional acoustic measures of jitter, shimmer, and harmonic-to-noise ratio in the assessment of various types of dysphonia.Methodology: A total of 60 males and 80 females were divided into two groups: dysphonic group and control group (30 males and 40 females in each group). The voice samples in the form of sustained vowel /a/ phonation and continuous speech were recorded and assessed using auditory perceptual analysis, acoustic analysis, and cepstral analysis.Results: Jitter was found to have the best predictive ability during sustained phonation, whereas CPPS was found to have the best predictive ability during continuous speech.Conclusion: Cepstral analysis is as reliable as the conventional acoustic analysis in the diagnosis of dysphonia and to detect its severity. However, CPPS cannot replace conventional acoustic measures.","PeriodicalId":49903,"journal":{"name":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","volume":"46 3","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14015439.2020.1767202","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1767202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the extent to which smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) can replace or complement the conventional acoustic measures of jitter, shimmer, and harmonic-to-noise ratio in the assessment of various types of dysphonia.

Methodology: A total of 60 males and 80 females were divided into two groups: dysphonic group and control group (30 males and 40 females in each group). The voice samples in the form of sustained vowel /a/ phonation and continuous speech were recorded and assessed using auditory perceptual analysis, acoustic analysis, and cepstral analysis.

Results: Jitter was found to have the best predictive ability during sustained phonation, whereas CPPS was found to have the best predictive ability during continuous speech.

Conclusion: Cepstral analysis is as reliable as the conventional acoustic analysis in the diagnosis of dysphonia and to detect its severity. However, CPPS cannot replace conventional acoustic measures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

语音障碍的评估:倒谱分析与常规声学分析。

目的:在本研究中，我们旨在确定平滑倒谱峰突出(CPPS)在多大程度上可以取代或补充传统的抖动、闪烁和谐波噪声比的声学测量，以评估各种类型的语音障碍。方法:将男性60例，女性80例分为发音障碍组和对照组，每组男性30例，女性40例。使用听觉感知分析、声学分析和倒谱分析对持续元音/a/发声和连续语音形式的语音样本进行记录和评估。结果:抖动对持续发声的预测能力最好，而CPPS对连续发声的预测能力最好。结论:倒谱分析与常规声学分析在诊断语音障碍及检测其严重程度方面同样可靠。然而，CPPS不能取代传统的声学测量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology is an amalgamation of the former journals Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics & Phoniatrics and VOICE. The intention is to cover topics related to speech, language and voice pathology as well as normal voice function in its different aspects. The Journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Phonation and laryngeal physiology Speech and language development Voice disorders Clinical measurements of speech, language and voice Professional voice including singing Bilingualism Cleft lip and palate Dyslexia Fluency disorders Neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics Aphasia Motor speech disorders Voice rehabilitation of laryngectomees Augmentative and alternative communication Acoustics Dysphagia Publications may have the form of original articles, i.e. theoretical or methodological studies or empirical reports, of reviews of books and dissertations, as well as of short reports, of minor or ongoing studies or short notes, commenting on earlier published material. Submitted papers will be evaluated by referees with relevant expertise.