Survival Benefits of N-Acetylcysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: Retrospective Evidence from an Indian Tertiary Care Setting.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Karen Mark, Shabnam Hyder, Muhammed Rashid, Viji P Chandran, Shubha Seshadri, Sneha Seshadri, Sreedharan Nair, Girish Thunga
{"title":"Survival Benefits of N-Acetylcysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: Retrospective Evidence from an Indian Tertiary Care Setting.","authors":"Karen Mark,&nbsp;Shabnam Hyder,&nbsp;Muhammed Rashid,&nbsp;Viji P Chandran,&nbsp;Shubha Seshadri,&nbsp;Sneha Seshadri,&nbsp;Sreedharan Nair,&nbsp;Girish Thunga","doi":"10.2174/1574884715666200513090634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Rodenticide poisoning, either accidental or intentional, is very common in rural India. The absence of a definite antidote made it a major concern with a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in rodenticide poisoning as there are recent positive shreds of evidence on it.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on patients admitted with rodenticide poisoning during a period of 2012-2017. The Fischer's exact test and relative risk were measured to analyze the outcome of treatment and risk factors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 30.04 ± 15.67 years. The suicidal attack was the major (86.0%) reason for poison consumption. The survival rate was significantly (p ≤ 0.03) higher in the NAC treatment group compared to the non-NAC group. Moreover, the majority (93.4%) of participants did not experience any adverse effects. The mean oral loading dose and maintenance dose was 7580.95 ± 2204.29 mg and 3694.53 ± 2322.58 mg, respectively. Yellow Phosphorus poisoning (Relative Risk [RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079); p=0.020) and Time lag of ≥ 24 hours (RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645); p=0.029) were the significant risk factors for mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAC is shown to have a significant survival benefit with a good safety profile among rodenticide poisoners. Further adequately powered prospective researches with more emphasis on dosing parameters are warranted for better quantification in different settings and for clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"16 2","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666200513090634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Rodenticide poisoning, either accidental or intentional, is very common in rural India. The absence of a definite antidote made it a major concern with a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in rodenticide poisoning as there are recent positive shreds of evidence on it.

Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on patients admitted with rodenticide poisoning during a period of 2012-2017. The Fischer's exact test and relative risk were measured to analyze the outcome of treatment and risk factors, respectively.

Results: A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 30.04 ± 15.67 years. The suicidal attack was the major (86.0%) reason for poison consumption. The survival rate was significantly (p ≤ 0.03) higher in the NAC treatment group compared to the non-NAC group. Moreover, the majority (93.4%) of participants did not experience any adverse effects. The mean oral loading dose and maintenance dose was 7580.95 ± 2204.29 mg and 3694.53 ± 2322.58 mg, respectively. Yellow Phosphorus poisoning (Relative Risk [RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079); p=0.020) and Time lag of ≥ 24 hours (RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645); p=0.029) were the significant risk factors for mortality.

Conclusion: NAC is shown to have a significant survival benefit with a good safety profile among rodenticide poisoners. Further adequately powered prospective researches with more emphasis on dosing parameters are warranted for better quantification in different settings and for clinical implementation.

n -乙酰半胱氨酸对杀鼠剂中毒患者的生存益处:来自印度三级医疗机构的回顾性证据。
理由与目的:灭鼠剂中毒,无论是意外的还是故意的,在印度农村是非常普遍的。由于缺乏明确的解毒剂,使其成为造成高死亡率的一个主要问题。因此,鉴于近年来有关n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)在杀鼠剂中毒中的阳性证据,本研究旨在评估NAC在杀鼠剂中毒中的有效性。方法:对某三级教学医院2012-2017年因杀鼠剂中毒入院的患者进行回顾性研究。分别测量fisher精确检验和相对危险度,分析治疗结果和危险因素。结果:229例患者入组,平均年龄30.04±15.67岁。自杀攻击是服毒的主要原因(86.0%)。NAC治疗组生存率显著高于非NAC组(p≤0.03)。此外,大多数(93.4%)的参与者没有出现任何不良反应。平均口服负荷剂量为7580.95±2204.29 mg,维持剂量为3694.53±2322.58 mg。黄磷中毒(相对危险度[RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079);p=0.020),时差≥24小时(RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645);P =0.029)是死亡率的显著危险因素。结论:NAC具有显著的生存效益和良好的安全性。为了在不同的环境和临床实施中更好地量化,有必要进一步充分支持前瞻性研究,更强调剂量参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信