Adaption of Maximal Glycolysis Rate after Resistance Exercise with Different Volume Load.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2020-04-23 eCollection Date: 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1146-4236
Nico Nitzsche, Julian Christian Lenz, Pjotr Voronoi, Henry Schulz
{"title":"Adaption of Maximal Glycolysis Rate after Resistance Exercise with Different Volume Load.","authors":"Nico Nitzsche,&nbsp;Julian Christian Lenz,&nbsp;Pjotr Voronoi,&nbsp;Henry Schulz","doi":"10.1055/a-1146-4236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of six-weeks of resistance training with different volume load on the maximum glycolysis rate. 24 male strength-trained volunteers were assigned in a high volume low load (50% of their 1RM with 5 sets and reps up to muscle failure) and a low volume high load (70% of their 1RM with 5 sets of ten reps) resistance exercise group. The resistance training performed 3 days per week over 6 weeks. The maximum glycolysis rate was determined using isokinetic force testing before and after the intervention. There was a significant increase in glycolysis rate over the training period across all subjects (p=0.032). High volume low load exercise increased significantly from 0.271±0.067 mmol·l <sup>-1</sup> ·s <sup>-1</sup> to 0.298±0.067 mmol·l <sup>-1</sup> ·s <sup>-1</sup> (p=0.022) and low volume high load exercise showed no significant changes from 0.249±0.122 mmol·l <sup>-1</sup> ·s <sup>-1</sup> to 0.291±0.089 mmol·l <sup>-1</sup> ·s <sup>-1</sup> (p=0.233). No significant effect on glycolysis rate was observed between the training groups (p=0.650). Resistance training increases glycolysis rate regardless of volume load.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"4 2","pages":"E39-E44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-1146-4236","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1146-4236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of six-weeks of resistance training with different volume load on the maximum glycolysis rate. 24 male strength-trained volunteers were assigned in a high volume low load (50% of their 1RM with 5 sets and reps up to muscle failure) and a low volume high load (70% of their 1RM with 5 sets of ten reps) resistance exercise group. The resistance training performed 3 days per week over 6 weeks. The maximum glycolysis rate was determined using isokinetic force testing before and after the intervention. There was a significant increase in glycolysis rate over the training period across all subjects (p=0.032). High volume low load exercise increased significantly from 0.271±0.067 mmol·l -1 ·s -1 to 0.298±0.067 mmol·l -1 ·s -1 (p=0.022) and low volume high load exercise showed no significant changes from 0.249±0.122 mmol·l -1 ·s -1 to 0.291±0.089 mmol·l -1 ·s -1 (p=0.233). No significant effect on glycolysis rate was observed between the training groups (p=0.650). Resistance training increases glycolysis rate regardless of volume load.

Abstract Image

不同容量负荷阻力运动后最大糖酵解速率的适应。
本研究的目的是探讨6周不同容量负荷的阻力训练对最大糖酵解速率的影响。24名接受力量训练的男性志愿者被分配到大容量低负荷组(50%的1RM, 5组,每组10次,直到肌肉衰竭)和小容量高负荷组(70%的1RM, 5组,每组10次)。阻力训练每周3天,持续6周。干预前后用等速力测试测定最大糖酵解速率。在训练期间,所有受试者的糖酵解率均显著增加(p=0.032)。高容量低负荷运动量从0.271±0.067 mmol·l -1·s -1增加到0.298±0.067 mmol·l -1·s -1 (p=0.022),低容量高负荷运动量从0.249±0.122 mmol·l -1·s -1增加到0.291±0.089 mmol·l -1·s -1无显著变化(p=0.233)。各组间糖酵解率无显著差异(p=0.650)。无论容量负荷如何,阻力训练都能提高糖酵解率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信