A descriptive analysis of assessment measures on the effectiveness of a comprehensive stuttering intervention approach: A single case study.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Tasneem F Karani, Anniah Mupawose
{"title":"A descriptive analysis of assessment measures on the effectiveness of a comprehensive stuttering intervention approach: A single case study.","authors":"Tasneem F Karani,&nbsp;Anniah Mupawose","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For effective client outcomes, stuttering assessment and intervention approaches need to be aligned. This encompasses using assessment and intervention approaches that address the three multidimensional constructs of stuttering, namely core behaviours, secondary behaviours and negative feelings and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to explore whether multiple assessment measures could be used to describe the effectiveness of a comprehensive stuttering intervention approach, undergirded by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-subject case design was employed with one male adult who stutters. Data was collected by administering the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition (SSI-4) and Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering-Adults (OASES-A) at three testing periods (pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention and 7 months post-intervention), and a semi-structured interview schedule immediately post-intervention. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse the SSI-4 and OASES-A, and thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the participant's interview schedule responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participant's total scores, impact scores and severity ratings of both the SSI-4 and OASES decreased across the three testing periods. The main theme of effectiveness of the comprehensive stuttering intervention to reduce aspects of disability emerged from the participant's responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation of the results from the assessment measures revealed that the comprehensive stuttering intervention approach was effective in reducing the participant's core behaviours, secondary behaviours and negative feelings and attitudes. Assessment and management of fluency disorders should promote a client-specific multidimensional approach that extends beyond the core behaviours and secondary behaviours, by addressing the underlying social and emotional facets of fluency disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"67 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.648","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: For effective client outcomes, stuttering assessment and intervention approaches need to be aligned. This encompasses using assessment and intervention approaches that address the three multidimensional constructs of stuttering, namely core behaviours, secondary behaviours and negative feelings and attitudes.

Objective: The study aimed to explore whether multiple assessment measures could be used to describe the effectiveness of a comprehensive stuttering intervention approach, undergirded by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.

Method: A single-subject case design was employed with one male adult who stutters. Data was collected by administering the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition (SSI-4) and Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering-Adults (OASES-A) at three testing periods (pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention and 7 months post-intervention), and a semi-structured interview schedule immediately post-intervention. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse the SSI-4 and OASES-A, and thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the participant's interview schedule responses.

Results: The participant's total scores, impact scores and severity ratings of both the SSI-4 and OASES decreased across the three testing periods. The main theme of effectiveness of the comprehensive stuttering intervention to reduce aspects of disability emerged from the participant's responses.

Conclusion: Evaluation of the results from the assessment measures revealed that the comprehensive stuttering intervention approach was effective in reducing the participant's core behaviours, secondary behaviours and negative feelings and attitudes. Assessment and management of fluency disorders should promote a client-specific multidimensional approach that extends beyond the core behaviours and secondary behaviours, by addressing the underlying social and emotional facets of fluency disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对综合口吃干预方法有效性评估措施的描述性分析:单一案例研究。
背景:为了获得有效的治疗结果,口吃评估和干预方法需要保持一致。这包括使用评估和干预方法,解决口吃的三个多维结构,即核心行为、次要行为和消极情绪和态度。目的:本研究旨在探讨在国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架的基础上,是否可以使用多种评估措施来描述综合口吃干预方法的有效性。方法:采用单受试者病例设计,选取1名口吃男性。采用《口吃严重程度量表-第四版》(SSI-4)和《成人口吃者说话者体验综合评估》(OASES-A)三个测试阶段(干预前、干预后立即和干预后7个月)和半结构化访谈计划收集数据。采用描述性统计方法对SSI-4和OASES-A进行分析,并采用专题分析方法对受访者的访谈时间安排进行评价。结果:在三个测试期间,参与者的si -4和OASES的总分、影响评分和严重程度评分均有所下降。综合口吃干预在减少残疾方面的有效性的主题从参与者的反应中浮现出来。结论:对测评测评结果的评价表明,综合口吃干预方法在减少被试核心行为、次要行为和消极情绪态度方面是有效的。流利性障碍的评估和管理应该通过解决流利性障碍潜在的社会和情感方面,促进针对客户的多维方法,超越核心行为和次要行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信