No Genotoxicity Is Detectable for Escherichia coli Strain Nissle 1917 by Standard In Vitro and In Vivo Tests.

European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology Pub Date : 2020-03-17 eCollection Date: 2020-04-07 DOI:10.1556/1886.2019.00025
Silke Dubbert, Birgit Klinkert, Michael Schimiczek, Trudy M Wassenaar, Rudolf von Bünau
{"title":"No Genotoxicity Is Detectable for <i>Escherichia coli</i> Strain Nissle 1917 by Standard In Vitro and In Vivo Tests.","authors":"Silke Dubbert,&nbsp;Birgit Klinkert,&nbsp;Michael Schimiczek,&nbsp;Trudy M Wassenaar,&nbsp;Rudolf von Bünau","doi":"10.1556/1886.2019.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Probiotic <i>Escherichia coli</i> strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) has a long history of safe use. However, the recently discovered presence of a <i>pks</i> locus in its genome presumably producing colibactin has questioned its safety, as colibactin has been implicated in genotoxicity. Here, we assess the genotoxic potential of EcN. Metabolic products were tested in vitro by the Ames test, a mutagenicity assay developed to detect point mutation-inducing activity. Live EcN were tested by an adapted Ames test. Neither the standard nor the adapted Ames test resulted in increased numbers of revertant colonies, indicating that EcN metabolites or viable cells lacked mutagenic activity. The in vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay (the gold standard for detecting DNA-strand breaks) was used to determine potentially induced DNA-strand breaks in cells of the gastro-intestinal tract of rats orally administered with viable EcN. Bacteria were given at 10<sup>9</sup>-10<sup>11</sup> colony forming units (CFU) per animal by oral gavage on 2 consecutive days and daily for a period of 28 days to 5 rats per group. No significant differences compared to negative controls were found. These results demonstrate that EcN does not induce DNA-strand breaks and does not have any detectable genotoxic potential in the test animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"10 1","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/e6/eujmi-10-011.PMC7182118.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2019.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) has a long history of safe use. However, the recently discovered presence of a pks locus in its genome presumably producing colibactin has questioned its safety, as colibactin has been implicated in genotoxicity. Here, we assess the genotoxic potential of EcN. Metabolic products were tested in vitro by the Ames test, a mutagenicity assay developed to detect point mutation-inducing activity. Live EcN were tested by an adapted Ames test. Neither the standard nor the adapted Ames test resulted in increased numbers of revertant colonies, indicating that EcN metabolites or viable cells lacked mutagenic activity. The in vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay (the gold standard for detecting DNA-strand breaks) was used to determine potentially induced DNA-strand breaks in cells of the gastro-intestinal tract of rats orally administered with viable EcN. Bacteria were given at 109-1011 colony forming units (CFU) per animal by oral gavage on 2 consecutive days and daily for a period of 28 days to 5 rats per group. No significant differences compared to negative controls were found. These results demonstrate that EcN does not induce DNA-strand breaks and does not have any detectable genotoxic potential in the test animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过标准体外和体内试验,大肠杆菌尼索尔1917株未检测到遗传毒性。
益生菌大肠杆菌Nissle 1917 (EcN)具有悠久的安全使用历史。然而,最近在其基因组中发现了可能产生大肠杆菌蛋白的pks位点,这对其安全性提出了质疑,因为大肠杆菌蛋白与遗传毒性有关。在这里,我们评估EcN的遗传毒性潜力。代谢产物在体外通过Ames试验进行测试,这是一种用于检测点诱变诱导活性的诱变性试验。采用改良的Ames试验对活体EcN进行检测。标准试验和改良的Ames试验均未导致逆转菌落数量增加,这表明EcN代谢物或活细胞缺乏致突变活性。采用哺乳动物碱性彗星法(检测dna链断裂的金标准)测定口服活EcN的大鼠胃肠道细胞中可能诱导的dna链断裂。以每只动物109 ~ 1011菌落形成单位(CFU)的剂量连续灌胃2天,每组5只,连续28 d。与阴性对照相比,无显著差异。这些结果表明,EcN不会诱导dna链断裂,并且在试验动物中没有任何可检测到的基因毒性潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信