Soon-Seek Yoon, Jae-Won Byun, Young-Il Park, Min-Jeong Kim, You-Chan Bae, Jae-Young Song
{"title":"Comparison of the diagnostic methods on the canine adenovirus type 2 infection","authors":"Soon-Seek Yoon, Jae-Won Byun, Young-Il Park, Min-Jeong Kim, You-Chan Bae, Jae-Young Song","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-9294.2010.01073.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Background and aims:</b> Canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) infection is typically diagnosed histopathologically since intranuclear inclusion bodies (IN/IBs) are demonstrable in the infected lung. However, it is sometimes difficult to identify IN/IBs, particularly in autolyzed tissues or samples from both early and late stages of infection, and other methods were presently developed. <b>Methods:</b> Stray dog samples were evaluated by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to investigate the status of the CAV-2 infection on the stray dogs in Korea. Histologic tests were performed, and dogs with pneumonic lungs were further evaluated by IHC and PCR. <b>Results:</b> Pathognomonic IN/IBs were identified in 3 of 213 lungs; CAV-2 PCR was positive for 27 of 213 pneumonic lungs. A total of 7 of 27 CAV-2 PCR-positive lungs were IHC-positive. No PCR-negative lung was IHC-positive. Positive results were primarily detected in the IN/IBs of the bronchial epithelial cells, macrophages, and very rarely in the cytoplasm of bronchial epithelial cells. <b>Conclusions:</b> IHC was a more reliable diagnostic method than conventional pathologic methods in the present study, and suggests that IHC should be routinely used in the diagnosis of CAV-2 infection. Further, PCR alone may not be adequate for CAV-2 diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":92990,"journal":{"name":"Basic and applied pathology","volume":"3 2","pages":"52-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1755-9294.2010.01073.x","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and applied pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1755-9294.2010.01073.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Background and aims: Canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) infection is typically diagnosed histopathologically since intranuclear inclusion bodies (IN/IBs) are demonstrable in the infected lung. However, it is sometimes difficult to identify IN/IBs, particularly in autolyzed tissues or samples from both early and late stages of infection, and other methods were presently developed. Methods: Stray dog samples were evaluated by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to investigate the status of the CAV-2 infection on the stray dogs in Korea. Histologic tests were performed, and dogs with pneumonic lungs were further evaluated by IHC and PCR. Results: Pathognomonic IN/IBs were identified in 3 of 213 lungs; CAV-2 PCR was positive for 27 of 213 pneumonic lungs. A total of 7 of 27 CAV-2 PCR-positive lungs were IHC-positive. No PCR-negative lung was IHC-positive. Positive results were primarily detected in the IN/IBs of the bronchial epithelial cells, macrophages, and very rarely in the cytoplasm of bronchial epithelial cells. Conclusions: IHC was a more reliable diagnostic method than conventional pathologic methods in the present study, and suggests that IHC should be routinely used in the diagnosis of CAV-2 infection. Further, PCR alone may not be adequate for CAV-2 diagnosis.