Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-14 DOI:10.1177/0146621619843829
Wenchao Ma
{"title":"Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.","authors":"Wenchao Ma","doi":"10.1177/0146621619843829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited-information fit measures appear to be promising in assessing the goodness-of-fit of dichotomous response cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), but their performance has not been examined for polytomous response CDMs. This study investigates the performance of the <i>M</i> <sub>ord</sub> statistic and standardized root mean square residual (SRMSR) for an ordinal response CDM-the sequential generalized deterministic inputs, noisy \"and\" gate model. Simulation studies showed that the <i>M</i> <sub>ord</sub> statistic had well-calibrated Type I error rates, but the correct detection rates were influenced by various factors such as item quality, sample size, and the number of response categories. In addition, the SRMSR was also influenced by many factors and the common practice of comparing the SRMSR against a prespecified cut-off (e.g., .05) may not be appropriate. A set of real data was analyzed as well to illustrate the use of <i>M</i> <sub>ord</sub> statistic and SRMSR in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"44 3","pages":"167-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146621619843829","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621619843829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Limited-information fit measures appear to be promising in assessing the goodness-of-fit of dichotomous response cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), but their performance has not been examined for polytomous response CDMs. This study investigates the performance of the M ord statistic and standardized root mean square residual (SRMSR) for an ordinal response CDM-the sequential generalized deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate model. Simulation studies showed that the M ord statistic had well-calibrated Type I error rates, but the correct detection rates were influenced by various factors such as item quality, sample size, and the number of response categories. In addition, the SRMSR was also influenced by many factors and the common practice of comparing the SRMSR against a prespecified cut-off (e.g., .05) may not be appropriate. A set of real data was analyzed as well to illustrate the use of M ord statistic and SRMSR in practice.

用有限信息测度评价序列G-DINA模型的拟合。
有限信息拟合测量在评估二分类反应认知诊断模型(CDMs)的拟合优度方面似乎很有前景,但其在多分类反应CDMs中的表现尚未得到检验。本文研究了有序响应cdm(序列广义确定性输入、噪声和门模型)的M统计量和标准化均方根残差(SRMSR)的性能。模拟研究表明,M - ord统计具有良好校准的I型错误率,但正确的检测率受到各种因素的影响,如项目质量、样本量和响应类别的数量。此外,SRMSR还受到许多因素的影响,通常将SRMSR与预先指定的截止值(例如,0.05)进行比较的做法可能不合适。并对一组实际数据进行了分析,以说明mord统计和SRMSR在实际中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信