E-health. Patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians. Part 2: Health apps and smart devices

IF 5 Q3 Medicine
C. Jacomet , R. Ologeanu-Taddei , J. Prouteau , C. Lambert , F. Linard , P. Bastiani , P. Dellamonica
{"title":"E-health. Patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians. Part 2: Health apps and smart devices","authors":"C. Jacomet ,&nbsp;R. Ologeanu-Taddei ,&nbsp;J. Prouteau ,&nbsp;C. Lambert ,&nbsp;F. Linard ,&nbsp;P. Bastiani ,&nbsp;P. Dellamonica","doi":"10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers to health/wellness applications (apps) and smart devices among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Online multicenter observational survey (October 15–19, 2018).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. Overall, 83/288 (29%) PLHIV had already downloaded at least one app: these ‘downloaders’ were younger (OR<!--> <!-->0.96<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.01, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004), educated to at least university entry level (OR<!--> <!-->2.27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.86, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03), and more frequently used geolocation-based dating websites (OR<!--> <!-->3.00<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.09, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002). However, 227/314 (72%) PLHIV claimed they were ready to use an app recommended by a physician. For the 60/83 PLHIV who answered, the ideal app would be a vaccination tracker (76%) to better communicate with their physician (68%). However, 96/277 (42%) physicians were unable to answer this question and for 94/227 (41%) of them, the ideal patient app would be for schedule management. Although PLHIV used smart devices, 231/306 (75%) would want to report the data to their physicians and 137/225 (61%) of physicians would welcome this exchange. The main physician-side barrier to this exchange was concerns over data security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>mHealth apps and smart devices have failed to garner adoption by PLHIV. There is a case for good-quality health data sharing and exchange if PLHIV are provided with appropriately secure tools and physicians are backed up by adapted legislation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18464,"journal":{"name":"Medecine et maladies infectieuses","volume":"50 7","pages":"Pages 582-589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.005","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine et maladies infectieuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399077X20300913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers to health/wellness applications (apps) and smart devices among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their physicians.

Methods

Online multicenter observational survey (October 15–19, 2018).

Results

Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. Overall, 83/288 (29%) PLHIV had already downloaded at least one app: these ‘downloaders’ were younger (OR 0.96 ± 0.01, P = 0.004), educated to at least university entry level (OR 2.27 ± 0.86, P = 0.03), and more frequently used geolocation-based dating websites (OR 3.00 ± 1.09, P = 0.002). However, 227/314 (72%) PLHIV claimed they were ready to use an app recommended by a physician. For the 60/83 PLHIV who answered, the ideal app would be a vaccination tracker (76%) to better communicate with their physician (68%). However, 96/277 (42%) physicians were unable to answer this question and for 94/227 (41%) of them, the ideal patient app would be for schedule management. Although PLHIV used smart devices, 231/306 (75%) would want to report the data to their physicians and 137/225 (61%) of physicians would welcome this exchange. The main physician-side barrier to this exchange was concerns over data security.

Conclusion

mHealth apps and smart devices have failed to garner adoption by PLHIV. There is a case for good-quality health data sharing and exchange if PLHIV are provided with appropriately secure tools and physicians are backed up by adapted legislation.

E-health。艾滋病毒感染者及其医生的使用模式和感知的益处和障碍。第二部分:健康应用和智能设备
目的评估艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)及其医生对健康/保健应用程序和智能设备的使用模式、感知益处和障碍。方法在线多中心观察调查(2018年10月15-19日)。结果有229名医生接受了研究,46个中心的838/1377名PLHIV患者接受了随访,其中325名(39%)在线回复。总体而言,83/288(29%)艾滋病毒感染者已经下载了至少一个应用程序:这些“下载者”更年轻(OR 0.96±0.01,P = 0.004),受教育程度至少为大学入学水平(OR 2.27±0.86,P = 0.03),更频繁使用基于地理位置的约会网站(OR 3.00±1.09,P = 0.002)。然而,227/314(72%)的艾滋病毒感染者声称他们准备使用医生推荐的应用程序。对于回答的60/83名PLHIV患者来说,理想的应用程序是疫苗接种追踪器(76%),以便更好地与医生沟通(68%)。然而,96/277(42%)的医生无法回答这个问题,94/227(41%)的医生认为理想的患者应用程序是用于日程管理。尽管PLHIV使用了智能设备,但231/306(75%)的人希望向医生报告数据,137/225(61%)的医生欢迎这种交流。医生方面的主要障碍是对数据安全的担忧。结论健康应用程序和智能设备未能获得艾滋病毒感染者的采用。如果向艾滋病毒感染者提供适当安全的工具,并且医生得到适当立法的支持,那么就有理由进行高质量的卫生数据共享和交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medecine et maladies infectieuses
Medecine et maladies infectieuses 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10.7 weeks
期刊介绍: L''organe d''expression de la Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF). Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses is the official publication of the Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF). Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses is indexed in the major databases: Medline, Web of Science/Clarivate and Scopus. The journal publishes scientific /research articles, general reviews, short communications and letters, in both English and French. The journal welcomes submissions on the various aspects of infectious pathologies and pathogenic agents. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses focuses on clinical therapeutics, nosocomial infections, biology, prevention, as well as epidemiology and therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信