Bone Mass Loss and Sarcopenia in Ecuadorian Patients.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2020-03-17 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1072675
M Intriago, G Maldonado, R Guerrero, O D Messina, C Rios
{"title":"Bone Mass Loss and Sarcopenia in Ecuadorian Patients.","authors":"M Intriago, G Maldonado, R Guerrero, O D Messina, C Rios","doi":"10.1155/2020/1072675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the association between osteoporosis and sarcopenia and determine the prevalence of osteosarcopenia in patients who attended a rheumatology center in Ecuador.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a population of patients who had a densitometric study. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was determined by the DXA standard gold test, screening, and conventional methods (bioimpedance, anthropometric measurements, SARC-F, muscle function, and gait test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 patients were studied. The median age was 66 ± 10, 90% females. Using the criteria of SMI, 65% had sarcopenia of which 9% had only sarcopenia and 56% had osteosarcopenia; 22% had only osteopenia/osteoporosis; and 13% none of these conditions. The prevalence of sarcopenia according to handgrip strength was 60%, gait speed 45%, and SARC-F score 40%. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia according to handgrip strength was 51%, gait speed 34%, and SARC-F score 32%. Osteoporosis was associated with a higher prevalence of sarcopenia using the criteria of SMI since 40% had sarcopenia in the normal DXA group, 64% in the osteopenia group, and 76% in the osteoporosis group (<i>p</i>=0.017). Of the women, 69% had sarcopenia compared to 33% of the men (<i>p</i>=0.034). The BMI was lower in the group with sarcopenia (25.1 ± 4.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) compared to the group without sarcopenia (29.4 ± 4.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with osteosarcopenia and sarcopenia had lower BMI, handgrip strength, ASM, SMI, and total-body skeletal muscle mass than those with osteopenia/osteoporosis or normal patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>65% of the studied population had sarcopenia. It is clear that the prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in patients with greater loss of bone mass. Identifying pathways that affect both bone and muscle could facilitate the development of treatments that simultaneously improve osteoporosis and sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1072675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1072675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the association between osteoporosis and sarcopenia and determine the prevalence of osteosarcopenia in patients who attended a rheumatology center in Ecuador.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a population of patients who had a densitometric study. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was determined by the DXA standard gold test, screening, and conventional methods (bioimpedance, anthropometric measurements, SARC-F, muscle function, and gait test).

Results: A total of 92 patients were studied. The median age was 66 ± 10, 90% females. Using the criteria of SMI, 65% had sarcopenia of which 9% had only sarcopenia and 56% had osteosarcopenia; 22% had only osteopenia/osteoporosis; and 13% none of these conditions. The prevalence of sarcopenia according to handgrip strength was 60%, gait speed 45%, and SARC-F score 40%. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia according to handgrip strength was 51%, gait speed 34%, and SARC-F score 32%. Osteoporosis was associated with a higher prevalence of sarcopenia using the criteria of SMI since 40% had sarcopenia in the normal DXA group, 64% in the osteopenia group, and 76% in the osteoporosis group (p=0.017). Of the women, 69% had sarcopenia compared to 33% of the men (p=0.034). The BMI was lower in the group with sarcopenia (25.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2) compared to the group without sarcopenia (29.4 ± 4.1 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Patients with osteosarcopenia and sarcopenia had lower BMI, handgrip strength, ASM, SMI, and total-body skeletal muscle mass than those with osteopenia/osteoporosis or normal patients.

Conclusion: 65% of the studied population had sarcopenia. It is clear that the prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in patients with greater loss of bone mass. Identifying pathways that affect both bone and muscle could facilitate the development of treatments that simultaneously improve osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

厄瓜多尔患者的骨质流失和肌肉疏松症
目的研究骨质疏松症与肌肉疏松症之间的关联,并确定在厄瓜多尔一家风湿病中心就诊的患者中骨质疏松症的发病率:方法: 对接受过骨密度测量的患者进行了一项横断面研究。通过 DXA 标准黄金测试、筛查和传统方法(生物阻抗、人体测量、SARC-F、肌肉功能和步态测试)确定肌肉疏松症的诊断:共有 92 名患者接受了研究。中位年龄为 66±10 岁,90% 为女性。根据 SMI 的标准,65% 的患者患有肌肉疏松症,其中 9% 的患者仅患有肌肉疏松症,56% 的患者患有骨-肌肉疏松症;22% 的患者仅患有骨质疏松症/骨质疏松症;13% 的患者不患有上述任何一种疾病。根据手握力、步速和 SARC-F 评分,肌肉疏松症的患病率分别为 60%、45% 和 40%。根据手握力量、步速和 SARC-F 评分,骨质疏松症的患病率分别为 51%、34% 和 32%。根据 SMI 的标准,骨质疏松症与较高的肌肉疏松症患病率有关,因为在正常 DXA 组中,40% 的人患有肌肉疏松症,在骨质疏松症组中为 64%,在骨质疏松症组中为 76%(P=0.017)。在女性中,69%患有肌肉疏松症,而男性中只有 33%(P=0.034)。肌肉疏松症患者的体重指数(25.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2)低于非肌肉疏松症患者(29.4 ± 4.1 kg/m2,p < 0.001)。与骨质疏松症/骨质疏松症患者或正常人相比,骨质疏松症和肌肉疏松症患者的体重指数、手握力、ASM、SMI 和全身骨骼肌质量均较低。结论:65% 的研究对象患有肌肉疏松症,很明显,骨质流失较多的患者患肌肉疏松症的比例较高。找出影响骨骼和肌肉的途径,有助于开发同时改善骨质疏松症和肌肉疏松症的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信