Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Safety Performance: Comparing Proactive and Reactive Approaches.

Q1 Medicine
Vahid Gharibi, Hamidreza Mokarami, Rosanna Cousins, Mehdi Jahangiri, Davood Eskandari
{"title":"Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Safety Performance: Comparing Proactive and Reactive Approaches.","authors":"Vahid Gharibi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Mokarami,&nbsp;Rosanna Cousins,&nbsp;Mehdi Jahangiri,&nbsp;Davood Eskandari","doi":"10.34172/ijoem.2020.1872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disorders and excessive daytime sleepiness negatively affect employees' safety performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship between excessive daytime sleepiness with obstructive sleep apnea and safety performance at an oil construction company in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>661 employees consented to participate in this study. Excessive daytime sleepiness was measured with the STOP-BANG questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). To determine how sleepiness would affect the studied occupational incidents, accidents causing injury and near misses, both reactive data and proactive safety performance indices were measured. Demographic and predictor variables were analyzed with hierarchical multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employees who met the criteria of excessive daytime sleepiness and obstructive sleep apnea had significantly poorer safety performance indicators. STOP-BANG and ESS were significant predictors of safety compliance (<i>β</i> 0.228 and 0.370, respectively), safety participation (<i>β</i> 0.210 and 0.144, respectively), and overall safety behavior (<i>β</i> 0.332 and 0.213, respectively). Further, occupational incidents were 2.5 times higher in workers with indicators of excessive daytime sleepiness and 2 times higher in those with obstructive sleep apnea compared with those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirmed that excessive daytime sleepiness is a serious safety hazard, and that both reactive and proactive measures are important to understand the relative contribution of predictor variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/75/ijoem-11-95.PMC7205513.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijoem.2020.1872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Sleep disorders and excessive daytime sleepiness negatively affect employees' safety performance.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between excessive daytime sleepiness with obstructive sleep apnea and safety performance at an oil construction company in Iran.

Methods: 661 employees consented to participate in this study. Excessive daytime sleepiness was measured with the STOP-BANG questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). To determine how sleepiness would affect the studied occupational incidents, accidents causing injury and near misses, both reactive data and proactive safety performance indices were measured. Demographic and predictor variables were analyzed with hierarchical multiple linear regression.

Results: Employees who met the criteria of excessive daytime sleepiness and obstructive sleep apnea had significantly poorer safety performance indicators. STOP-BANG and ESS were significant predictors of safety compliance (β 0.228 and 0.370, respectively), safety participation (β 0.210 and 0.144, respectively), and overall safety behavior (β 0.332 and 0.213, respectively). Further, occupational incidents were 2.5 times higher in workers with indicators of excessive daytime sleepiness and 2 times higher in those with obstructive sleep apnea compared with those without.

Conclusion: These findings confirmed that excessive daytime sleepiness is a serious safety hazard, and that both reactive and proactive measures are important to understand the relative contribution of predictor variables.

白天过度嗜睡和安全性能:比较主动和被动方法。
背景:睡眠障碍和白天过度嗜睡会对员工的安全绩效产生负面影响。目的:探讨伊朗某石油建设公司员工日间嗜睡伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与安全绩效的关系。方法:661名员工同意参与本研究。采用STOP-BANG问卷和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)测量白天过度嗜睡。为了确定困倦如何影响所研究的职业事故、造成伤害的事故和未遂事故,测量了反应性数据和主动安全绩效指标。人口统计变量和预测变量采用层次多元线性回归分析。结果:符合白天过度嗜睡和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停标准的员工安全绩效指标明显较差。STOP-BANG和ESS是安全依从性(β值分别为0.228和0.370)、安全参与(β值分别为0.210和0.144)和整体安全行为(β值分别为0.332和0.213)的显著预测因子。此外,有白天过度嗜睡指标的工人的职业事故比没有嗜睡指标的工人高2.5倍,有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的工人的职业事故比没有嗜睡指标的工人高2倍。结论:这些发现证实了白天过度嗜睡是一种严重的安全隐患,并且被动和主动措施对于理解预测变量的相对贡献都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信