The Anxiolytic Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Insomnia: Preliminary Results from a Web-delivered Protocol.

Journal of sleep medicine and disorders Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-02-23
Vivek Pillai, Jason R Anderson, Philip Cheng, Luisa Bazan, Sophie Bostock, Colin A Espie, Thomas Roth, Christopher L Drake
{"title":"The Anxiolytic Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Insomnia: Preliminary Results from a Web-delivered Protocol.","authors":"Vivek Pillai,&nbsp;Jason R Anderson,&nbsp;Philip Cheng,&nbsp;Luisa Bazan,&nbsp;Sophie Bostock,&nbsp;Colin A Espie,&nbsp;Thomas Roth,&nbsp;Christopher L Drake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBTI) is well-established, the paucity of credentialed providers hinders widespread access. Further, the impact of alternatives such as web-delivered CBTI has not been adequately tested on common insomnia comorbidities such as anxiety. Therefore, we assessed the impact of an empirically validated web-delivered CBTI intervention on insomnia and comorbid anxiety symptoms. A sample of 22 adults (49.8±13.5 yo; 62.5% female) with DSM-5 based insomnia were randomized to either an active CBTI treatment group (n = 13) or an information-control (IC) group (n = 9). Participants in the CBTI group underwent a standard CBTI program delivered online by a 'virtual' therapist, whereas the IC group received weekly 'sleep tips' and general sleep hygiene education via electronic mail. All participants self-reported sleep parameters, including sleep onset latency (SOL), insomnia symptoms per the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and anxiety symptoms per the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at both baseline as well as follow- up assessment one week post-treatment. There were no significant differences between the CBTI and IC groups on baseline measures. The CBTI group showed significantly larger reductions in BAI scores (t = 2.6; p < .05; Cohen's d = .8) and ISI scores (t = 2.1; p < .05; Cohen's d = .9) at follow-up than did the IC group. Further, changes in SOL from baseline (62.3±44.0 minutes) to follow-up (22.3±14.4 minutes) in the CBTI group were also significantly greater (t = 2.3; p < .05; Cohen's d = .9) than in the IC group (baseline: 55.0±44.2 minutes; follow-up: 50.±60.2 minutes). This study offers preliminary evidence that a web-delivered CBTI protocol with minimal patient contact can improve comorbid anxiety symptoms among individuals with insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":90623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sleep medicine and disorders","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081886/pdf/nihms-1562442.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sleep medicine and disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBTI) is well-established, the paucity of credentialed providers hinders widespread access. Further, the impact of alternatives such as web-delivered CBTI has not been adequately tested on common insomnia comorbidities such as anxiety. Therefore, we assessed the impact of an empirically validated web-delivered CBTI intervention on insomnia and comorbid anxiety symptoms. A sample of 22 adults (49.8±13.5 yo; 62.5% female) with DSM-5 based insomnia were randomized to either an active CBTI treatment group (n = 13) or an information-control (IC) group (n = 9). Participants in the CBTI group underwent a standard CBTI program delivered online by a 'virtual' therapist, whereas the IC group received weekly 'sleep tips' and general sleep hygiene education via electronic mail. All participants self-reported sleep parameters, including sleep onset latency (SOL), insomnia symptoms per the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and anxiety symptoms per the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at both baseline as well as follow- up assessment one week post-treatment. There were no significant differences between the CBTI and IC groups on baseline measures. The CBTI group showed significantly larger reductions in BAI scores (t = 2.6; p < .05; Cohen's d = .8) and ISI scores (t = 2.1; p < .05; Cohen's d = .9) at follow-up than did the IC group. Further, changes in SOL from baseline (62.3±44.0 minutes) to follow-up (22.3±14.4 minutes) in the CBTI group were also significantly greater (t = 2.3; p < .05; Cohen's d = .9) than in the IC group (baseline: 55.0±44.2 minutes; follow-up: 50.±60.2 minutes). This study offers preliminary evidence that a web-delivered CBTI protocol with minimal patient contact can improve comorbid anxiety symptoms among individuals with insomnia.

Abstract Image

认知行为疗法对失眠的抗焦虑作用:来自网络传输协议的初步结果。
虽然认知行为治疗失眠(CBTI)的疗效是公认的,但缺乏有资质的提供者阻碍了广泛使用。此外,网络传递的CBTI等替代方法的影响尚未得到充分的测试,以治疗常见的失眠合并症,如焦虑。因此,我们评估了经验验证的网络传递CBTI干预对失眠和共病焦虑症状的影响。22名成人(49.8±13.5岁;62.5%的女性)被随机分为积极的CBTI治疗组(n = 13)和信息控制(IC)组(n = 9)。CBTI组的参与者接受了由“虚拟”治疗师在线提供的标准CBTI计划,而IC组的参与者每周接受“睡眠技巧”和通过电子邮件进行的一般睡眠卫生教育。所有参与者在基线和治疗后一周的随访评估中自我报告睡眠参数,包括睡眠发作潜伏期(SOL)、失眠严重指数(ISI)的失眠症状和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)的焦虑症状。CBTI组和IC组在基线测量上没有显著差异。CBTI组在BAI得分上的下降幅度更大(t = 2.6;P < 0.05;Cohen’s d = .8)和ISI评分(t = 2.1;P < 0.05;随访时Cohen的d = .9)高于IC组。此外,CBTI组的SOL从基线(62.3±44.0分钟)到随访(22.3±14.4分钟)的变化也显著更大(t = 2.3;P < 0.05;Cohen’s d = .9)比IC组(基线:55.0±44.2分钟;随访时间:50±60.2分钟)。本研究提供了初步证据,表明网络传递的CBTI方案与患者接触最少,可以改善失眠患者的共病焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信