Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, tips and long-term results. A single center experience.

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine
Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-17 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08201-2
Monica Ortenzi, Roberto Ghiselli, Rosaria Gesuita, Mario Guerrieri
{"title":"Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, tips and long-term results. A single center experience.","authors":"Monica Ortenzi,&nbsp;Roberto Ghiselli,&nbsp;Rosaria Gesuita,&nbsp;Mario Guerrieri","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08201-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was introduced to combine the curativeness of full thickness excision with minimum morbidity, while traditional rectal surgery is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates. However, while it is still a matter of considerable debate whether local excision is an adequate approach for curative resection of rectal cancer, new minimally invasive operative techniques have been introduced. The purpose of this paper was to show the indications, the tips and long term results of this technique through the review of the largest single-center database available to date. The showed results derived from the single center experience of the Clinica Chirurgica of Polytechnic University of Marche.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed a 25-year database from May 1992 to May 2017. We divided the patients into three different groups of patients according to the preoperative diagnosis: rectal cancers, adenomas and other rectal lesions. Rectal adenomas were divided into two groups according to their diameter (> or <5 cm). Rectal cancer patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative staging: early rectal cancer and irradiated rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1324 patients who had rectal tumors excised with TEM at our institution, preoperative histology was rectal adenoma in 729 (55%) patients, adenocarcinoma in 536 (40.5%) patients and other lesions in the remaining 59 (4.4%) patients. 5 years overall survival (OS) and Recurrence free survival (RFS) were 93.3% and 98.6% for patients with rectal adenomas and 86.8% and 70.9% for patients with rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEM can be a valid alternative for the treatment of both benign and malignant rectal lesions, further studies are needed to define more specific indications to justify the survival of this technique in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08201-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was introduced to combine the curativeness of full thickness excision with minimum morbidity, while traditional rectal surgery is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates. However, while it is still a matter of considerable debate whether local excision is an adequate approach for curative resection of rectal cancer, new minimally invasive operative techniques have been introduced. The purpose of this paper was to show the indications, the tips and long term results of this technique through the review of the largest single-center database available to date. The showed results derived from the single center experience of the Clinica Chirurgica of Polytechnic University of Marche.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a 25-year database from May 1992 to May 2017. We divided the patients into three different groups of patients according to the preoperative diagnosis: rectal cancers, adenomas and other rectal lesions. Rectal adenomas were divided into two groups according to their diameter (> or <5 cm). Rectal cancer patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative staging: early rectal cancer and irradiated rectal cancer.

Results: Among the 1324 patients who had rectal tumors excised with TEM at our institution, preoperative histology was rectal adenoma in 729 (55%) patients, adenocarcinoma in 536 (40.5%) patients and other lesions in the remaining 59 (4.4%) patients. 5 years overall survival (OS) and Recurrence free survival (RFS) were 93.3% and 98.6% for patients with rectal adenomas and 86.8% and 70.9% for patients with rectal cancer.

Conclusions: TEM can be a valid alternative for the treatment of both benign and malignant rectal lesions, further studies are needed to define more specific indications to justify the survival of this technique in the future.

经肛门内窥镜显微手术:指征、技巧和长期效果。单中心体验。
背景:引入经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM),将全层切除的治愈率和最低的发病率结合起来,而传统的直肠手术存在着高发病率和高死亡率的问题。然而,尽管局部切除是否是直肠癌根治性切除的适当方法仍存在相当大的争议,但新的微创手术技术已经被引入。本文的目的是通过对迄今为止最大的单中心数据库的回顾,展示该技术的适应症、提示和长期结果。所显示的结果来源于马尔凯理工大学临床手术的单中心经验。方法:回顾性分析了1992年5月至2017年5月的25年数据库。我们根据术前诊断将患者分为三组:直肠癌、腺瘤和其他直肠病变。结果:我院1324例经TEM切除的直肠肿瘤患者,术前组织学为直肠腺瘤729例(55%),腺癌536例(40.5%),其他病变59例(4.4%)。直肠腺瘤患者的5年总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)分别为93.3%和98.6%,直肠癌患者为86.8%和70.9%。结论:TEM可以作为治疗直肠良性和恶性病变的有效选择,需要进一步的研究来确定更具体的适应症,以证明该技术在未来的生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信